Testing automated sensor traps for mammal field studies

Context. Live traps are regularly used in field and enclosure studies with mammals. In some scenarios, such as, for example, when the focus is on temporal patterns or to minimise the time animals are contained inside the trap for animal-ethics reasons, it can be highly useful to be alerted immediate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wildlife Research
Main Authors: E. Notz, C. Imholt, D. Reil, J. Jacob
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: CSIRO Publishing 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16192
id ftbioone:10.1071/WR16192
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbioone:10.1071/WR16192 2024-06-02T08:10:26+00:00 Testing automated sensor traps for mammal field studies E. Notz C. Imholt D. Reil J. Jacob E. Notz C. Imholt D. Reil J. Jacob world 2017-03-07 text/HTML https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16192 en eng CSIRO Publishing doi:10.1071/WR16192 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16192 Text 2017 ftbioone https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16192 2024-05-07T00:50:12Z Context. Live traps are regularly used in field and enclosure studies with mammals. In some scenarios, such as, for example, when the focus is on temporal patterns or to minimise the time animals are contained inside the trap for animal-ethics reasons, it can be highly useful to be alerted immediately when an individual is trapped.Aims. In the present study, an automated system was trialed that is designed to automatically send a signal to a receiving device (pager, computer, mobile phone) when the body heat or movement of a trapped small mammal is registered by an infrared sensor (ERMINEA permanent monitoring system for rodent detection).Methods. Sensors were attached to Ugglan multiple-capture traps and used in laboratory conditions and in semi-natural outdoor enclosures with common voles (Microtus arvalis) and bank voles (Myodes glareolus), as well as in the field with bank voles, Apodemus species and common voles. Sensor readings were compared to visual observation and trapping results.Key results. In enclosure and field conditions, 100% and 98.7% of traps recorded captured animals correctly. There were no sensor signals when rodents moved along the outside or in the entrance compartment of the traps. Rodents sitting on the trap door triggered the sensor in 50% of cases when there was no bedding in the trap; however, there were no sensor signals if bedding was present. In laboratory trials, 20–70% of traps were falsely triggered by large insects (crickets), depending on ambient temperature and whether bedding was in the trap.Conclusions. Generally, the system was a reliable, flexible and easy-to-handle tool to monitor live captures. To minimise false negatives (animals trapped without signal), testing sensor function in the pre-baiting phase and software adjustments are recommended.Implications. The sensors are compatible with various trapping and other monitoring devices, providing the potential to be used in a wide range of applications. Their use is likely to optimise study designs, especially when ... Text Microtus arvalis BioOne Online Journals Wildlife Research 44 1 72
institution Open Polar
collection BioOne Online Journals
op_collection_id ftbioone
language English
description Context. Live traps are regularly used in field and enclosure studies with mammals. In some scenarios, such as, for example, when the focus is on temporal patterns or to minimise the time animals are contained inside the trap for animal-ethics reasons, it can be highly useful to be alerted immediately when an individual is trapped.Aims. In the present study, an automated system was trialed that is designed to automatically send a signal to a receiving device (pager, computer, mobile phone) when the body heat or movement of a trapped small mammal is registered by an infrared sensor (ERMINEA permanent monitoring system for rodent detection).Methods. Sensors were attached to Ugglan multiple-capture traps and used in laboratory conditions and in semi-natural outdoor enclosures with common voles (Microtus arvalis) and bank voles (Myodes glareolus), as well as in the field with bank voles, Apodemus species and common voles. Sensor readings were compared to visual observation and trapping results.Key results. In enclosure and field conditions, 100% and 98.7% of traps recorded captured animals correctly. There were no sensor signals when rodents moved along the outside or in the entrance compartment of the traps. Rodents sitting on the trap door triggered the sensor in 50% of cases when there was no bedding in the trap; however, there were no sensor signals if bedding was present. In laboratory trials, 20–70% of traps were falsely triggered by large insects (crickets), depending on ambient temperature and whether bedding was in the trap.Conclusions. Generally, the system was a reliable, flexible and easy-to-handle tool to monitor live captures. To minimise false negatives (animals trapped without signal), testing sensor function in the pre-baiting phase and software adjustments are recommended.Implications. The sensors are compatible with various trapping and other monitoring devices, providing the potential to be used in a wide range of applications. Their use is likely to optimise study designs, especially when ...
author2 E. Notz
C. Imholt
D. Reil
J. Jacob
format Text
author E. Notz
C. Imholt
D. Reil
J. Jacob
spellingShingle E. Notz
C. Imholt
D. Reil
J. Jacob
Testing automated sensor traps for mammal field studies
author_facet E. Notz
C. Imholt
D. Reil
J. Jacob
author_sort E. Notz
title Testing automated sensor traps for mammal field studies
title_short Testing automated sensor traps for mammal field studies
title_full Testing automated sensor traps for mammal field studies
title_fullStr Testing automated sensor traps for mammal field studies
title_full_unstemmed Testing automated sensor traps for mammal field studies
title_sort testing automated sensor traps for mammal field studies
publisher CSIRO Publishing
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16192
op_coverage world
genre Microtus arvalis
genre_facet Microtus arvalis
op_source https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16192
op_relation doi:10.1071/WR16192
op_rights All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16192
container_title Wildlife Research
container_volume 44
container_issue 1
container_start_page 72
_version_ 1800756309471002624