Biogeographical regionalisation of the world: a reappraisal

Some phytogeographical, zoogeographical and biogeographical regionalisations of the world are reviewed qualitatively. A biogeographical regionalisation attempting some consensus is proposed, recognising the following three kingdoms and nine regions: Holarctic kingdom (Nearctic and Palearctic regions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Australian Systematic Botany
Main Author: Juan J. Morrone
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: CSIRO Publishing 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1071/SB14042
id ftbioone:10.1071/SB14042
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbioone:10.1071/SB14042 2024-06-02T07:58:03+00:00 Biogeographical regionalisation of the world: a reappraisal Juan J. Morrone Juan J. Morrone world 2015-11-13 text/HTML https://doi.org/10.1071/SB14042 en eng CSIRO Publishing doi:10.1071/SB14042 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1071/SB14042 Text 2015 ftbioone https://doi.org/10.1071/SB14042 2024-05-07T00:49:46Z Some phytogeographical, zoogeographical and biogeographical regionalisations of the world are reviewed qualitatively. A biogeographical regionalisation attempting some consensus is proposed, recognising the following three kingdoms and nine regions: Holarctic kingdom (Nearctic and Palearctic regions), Holotropical kingdom (Neotropical, Ethiopian and Oriental regions) and Austral kingdom (Cape, Andean, Australian and Antarctic regions). Additionally, the following five transition zones are recognised: Mexican (Nearctic–Neotropical transition), Saharo-Arabian (Palearctic–Ethiopian transition), Chinese (Palearctic–Oriental transition), Indo-Malayan (Oriental–Australian transition) and South American (Neotropical–Andean transition). Text Antarc* Antarctic BioOne Online Journals Antarctic Austral Australian Systematic Botany 28 3 81
institution Open Polar
collection BioOne Online Journals
op_collection_id ftbioone
language English
description Some phytogeographical, zoogeographical and biogeographical regionalisations of the world are reviewed qualitatively. A biogeographical regionalisation attempting some consensus is proposed, recognising the following three kingdoms and nine regions: Holarctic kingdom (Nearctic and Palearctic regions), Holotropical kingdom (Neotropical, Ethiopian and Oriental regions) and Austral kingdom (Cape, Andean, Australian and Antarctic regions). Additionally, the following five transition zones are recognised: Mexican (Nearctic–Neotropical transition), Saharo-Arabian (Palearctic–Ethiopian transition), Chinese (Palearctic–Oriental transition), Indo-Malayan (Oriental–Australian transition) and South American (Neotropical–Andean transition).
author2 Juan J. Morrone
format Text
author Juan J. Morrone
spellingShingle Juan J. Morrone
Biogeographical regionalisation of the world: a reappraisal
author_facet Juan J. Morrone
author_sort Juan J. Morrone
title Biogeographical regionalisation of the world: a reappraisal
title_short Biogeographical regionalisation of the world: a reappraisal
title_full Biogeographical regionalisation of the world: a reappraisal
title_fullStr Biogeographical regionalisation of the world: a reappraisal
title_full_unstemmed Biogeographical regionalisation of the world: a reappraisal
title_sort biogeographical regionalisation of the world: a reappraisal
publisher CSIRO Publishing
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.1071/SB14042
op_coverage world
geographic Antarctic
Austral
geographic_facet Antarctic
Austral
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_source https://doi.org/10.1071/SB14042
op_relation doi:10.1071/SB14042
op_rights All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1071/SB14042
container_title Australian Systematic Botany
container_volume 28
container_issue 3
container_start_page 81
_version_ 1800741312453935104