Is the Genus Cissus (Vitaceae) Monophyletic? Evidence from Plastid and Nuclear Ribosomal DNA

The trnL (UAA) intron and ITS1 region were sequenced to investigate relationships among the five genera of Vitaceae present in Australia relative to Vitis. Congruent results were obtained between separate and combined data sets, with all major clades being shared among trees. All bootstrap consensus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maurizio Rossetto, Betsy R. Jackes, Kirsten D. Scott, Robert J. Henry
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: The American Society of Plant Taxonomists 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1043/0363-6445-27.3.522
id ftbioone:10.1043/0363-6445-27.3.522
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbioone:10.1043/0363-6445-27.3.522 2024-06-02T07:57:32+00:00 Is the Genus Cissus (Vitaceae) Monophyletic? Evidence from Plastid and Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Maurizio Rossetto Betsy R. Jackes Kirsten D. Scott Robert J. Henry Maurizio Rossetto Betsy R. Jackes Kirsten D. Scott Robert J. Henry world 2002-07-01 text/HTML https://doi.org/10.1043/0363-6445-27.3.522 en eng The American Society of Plant Taxonomists doi:10.1043/0363-6445-27.3.522 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1043/0363-6445-27.3.522 Text 2002 ftbioone https://doi.org/10.1043/0363-6445-27.3.522 2024-05-07T00:48:53Z The trnL (UAA) intron and ITS1 region were sequenced to investigate relationships among the five genera of Vitaceae present in Australia relative to Vitis. Congruent results were obtained between separate and combined data sets, with all major clades being shared among trees. All bootstrap consensus trees obtained from single sequences or combined analysis strongly suggest that Cissus is polyphyletic, corroborating the morphological inconsistencies reported previously. Cissus opaca and Clematicissus angustissima consistently grouped in a common clade. A further four taxa (C. antarctica, C. hypoglauca, C. oblonga, and C. sterculiifolia) also grouped within a clade disjunct from the main Cissus clade. Our results suggest that these five species currently classified as Cissus should be segregated from the genus. Of further interest is the close relationship between Cayratia and Tetrastigma. Overall, the results presented provide new insights into the relationships within a number of Vitaceae genera and suggest directions for future studies.Communicating Editor: Aaron Liston Text Antarc* Antarctica BioOne Online Journals
institution Open Polar
collection BioOne Online Journals
op_collection_id ftbioone
language English
description The trnL (UAA) intron and ITS1 region were sequenced to investigate relationships among the five genera of Vitaceae present in Australia relative to Vitis. Congruent results were obtained between separate and combined data sets, with all major clades being shared among trees. All bootstrap consensus trees obtained from single sequences or combined analysis strongly suggest that Cissus is polyphyletic, corroborating the morphological inconsistencies reported previously. Cissus opaca and Clematicissus angustissima consistently grouped in a common clade. A further four taxa (C. antarctica, C. hypoglauca, C. oblonga, and C. sterculiifolia) also grouped within a clade disjunct from the main Cissus clade. Our results suggest that these five species currently classified as Cissus should be segregated from the genus. Of further interest is the close relationship between Cayratia and Tetrastigma. Overall, the results presented provide new insights into the relationships within a number of Vitaceae genera and suggest directions for future studies.Communicating Editor: Aaron Liston
author2 Maurizio Rossetto
Betsy R. Jackes
Kirsten D. Scott
Robert J. Henry
format Text
author Maurizio Rossetto
Betsy R. Jackes
Kirsten D. Scott
Robert J. Henry
spellingShingle Maurizio Rossetto
Betsy R. Jackes
Kirsten D. Scott
Robert J. Henry
Is the Genus Cissus (Vitaceae) Monophyletic? Evidence from Plastid and Nuclear Ribosomal DNA
author_facet Maurizio Rossetto
Betsy R. Jackes
Kirsten D. Scott
Robert J. Henry
author_sort Maurizio Rossetto
title Is the Genus Cissus (Vitaceae) Monophyletic? Evidence from Plastid and Nuclear Ribosomal DNA
title_short Is the Genus Cissus (Vitaceae) Monophyletic? Evidence from Plastid and Nuclear Ribosomal DNA
title_full Is the Genus Cissus (Vitaceae) Monophyletic? Evidence from Plastid and Nuclear Ribosomal DNA
title_fullStr Is the Genus Cissus (Vitaceae) Monophyletic? Evidence from Plastid and Nuclear Ribosomal DNA
title_full_unstemmed Is the Genus Cissus (Vitaceae) Monophyletic? Evidence from Plastid and Nuclear Ribosomal DNA
title_sort is the genus cissus (vitaceae) monophyletic? evidence from plastid and nuclear ribosomal dna
publisher The American Society of Plant Taxonomists
publishDate 2002
url https://doi.org/10.1043/0363-6445-27.3.522
op_coverage world
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source https://doi.org/10.1043/0363-6445-27.3.522
op_relation doi:10.1043/0363-6445-27.3.522
op_rights All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1043/0363-6445-27.3.522
_version_ 1800740698591330304