Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions

Flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus L.) is an invasive aquatic and wetland plant capable of developing monotypic stands in emergent and submersed sites. This plant can rapidly outcompete native vegetation and impede human practices by reducing recreation (boating, fishing, and skiing) and disrupting...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Invasive Plant Science and Management
Main Authors: Gray Turnage, John D. Madsen, Ryan M. Wersal, John D. Byrd
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Weed Science Society of America 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2019.6
id ftbioone:10.1017/inp.2019.6
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbioone:10.1017/inp.2019.6 2024-06-02T08:04:40+00:00 Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions Gray Turnage John D. Madsen Ryan M. Wersal John D. Byrd Gray Turnage John D. Madsen Ryan M. Wersal John D. Byrd world 2019-04-17 text/HTML https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2019.6 en eng Weed Science Society of America doi:10.1017/inp.2019.6 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2019.6 Text 2019 ftbioone https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2019.6 2024-05-07T00:47:45Z Flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus L.) is an invasive aquatic and wetland plant capable of developing monotypic stands in emergent and submersed sites. This plant can rapidly outcompete native vegetation and impede human practices by reducing recreation (boating, fishing, and skiing) and disrupting agricultural use of water resources (irrigation canals). Mechanical removal practices occurring biweekly, monthly, bimonthly, and once per growing season were compared with chemical control with diquat applied sequentially at 0.19 ppmv ai for two consecutive months over 2 yr (2016 and 2017). Biweekly removal gave the most consistent control of B. umbellatus biomass and propagules. Diquat application along with monthly and bimonthly clippings gave varying degrees of B. umbellatus control. Clipping once per growing season did not control B. umbellatus when compared with reference plants, while clipping B. umbellatus every 2 wk (biweekly) controlled rush propagules most effectively. However, it is unlikely this method will be sufficient as a stand-alone control option due to the slow speed of harvester boats, the potential these boats have to spread B. umbellatus propagules to more sites, and the expense of mechanical operations. However, clipping could be used as part of an integrated strategy for B. umbellatus control. Text Butomus umbellatus BioOne Online Journals Invasive Plant Science and Management 12 02 120 123
institution Open Polar
collection BioOne Online Journals
op_collection_id ftbioone
language English
description Flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus L.) is an invasive aquatic and wetland plant capable of developing monotypic stands in emergent and submersed sites. This plant can rapidly outcompete native vegetation and impede human practices by reducing recreation (boating, fishing, and skiing) and disrupting agricultural use of water resources (irrigation canals). Mechanical removal practices occurring biweekly, monthly, bimonthly, and once per growing season were compared with chemical control with diquat applied sequentially at 0.19 ppmv ai for two consecutive months over 2 yr (2016 and 2017). Biweekly removal gave the most consistent control of B. umbellatus biomass and propagules. Diquat application along with monthly and bimonthly clippings gave varying degrees of B. umbellatus control. Clipping once per growing season did not control B. umbellatus when compared with reference plants, while clipping B. umbellatus every 2 wk (biweekly) controlled rush propagules most effectively. However, it is unlikely this method will be sufficient as a stand-alone control option due to the slow speed of harvester boats, the potential these boats have to spread B. umbellatus propagules to more sites, and the expense of mechanical operations. However, clipping could be used as part of an integrated strategy for B. umbellatus control.
author2 Gray Turnage
John D. Madsen
Ryan M. Wersal
John D. Byrd
format Text
author Gray Turnage
John D. Madsen
Ryan M. Wersal
John D. Byrd
spellingShingle Gray Turnage
John D. Madsen
Ryan M. Wersal
John D. Byrd
Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
author_facet Gray Turnage
John D. Madsen
Ryan M. Wersal
John D. Byrd
author_sort Gray Turnage
title Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
title_short Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
title_full Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
title_fullStr Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
title_full_unstemmed Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
title_sort simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
publisher Weed Science Society of America
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2019.6
op_coverage world
genre Butomus umbellatus
genre_facet Butomus umbellatus
op_source https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2019.6
op_relation doi:10.1017/inp.2019.6
op_rights All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2019.6
container_title Invasive Plant Science and Management
container_volume 12
container_issue 02
container_start_page 120
op_container_end_page 123
_version_ 1800749320368029696