Diet of Lake Trout and Burbot in Northern Lake Michigan During Spring: Evidence of Ecological Interaction

We used analyses of burbot (Lota lota) and lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) diets taken during spring gillnet surveys in northern Lake Michigan in 2006–2008 to investigate the potential for competition and predator-prey interactions between these two species. We also compared our results to histori...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Great Lakes Research
Main Authors: Gregory R. Jacobs, Charles P. Madenjian, David B. Bunnell, Jeffrey D. Holuszko
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: International Association for Great Lakes Research 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2010.02.007
id ftbioone:10.1016/j.jglr.2010.02.007
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbioone:10.1016/j.jglr.2010.02.007 2024-06-02T08:04:38+00:00 Diet of Lake Trout and Burbot in Northern Lake Michigan During Spring: Evidence of Ecological Interaction Gregory R. Jacobs Charles P. Madenjian David B. Bunnell Jeffrey D. Holuszko Gregory R. Jacobs Charles P. Madenjian David B. Bunnell Jeffrey D. Holuszko world 2010-06-01 text/HTML https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2010.02.007 en eng International Association for Great Lakes Research doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2010.02.007 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2010.02.007 Text 2010 ftbioone https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2010.02.007 2024-05-07T00:47:03Z We used analyses of burbot (Lota lota) and lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) diets taken during spring gillnet surveys in northern Lake Michigan in 2006–2008 to investigate the potential for competition and predator-prey interactions between these two species. We also compared our results to historical data from 1932. During 2006–2008, lake trout diet consisted mainly of alewives (Alosa pseudoharengus) and rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax), whereas burbot utilized a much wider prey base including round goby (Neogobius melanostomus), rainbow smelt, alewives, and sculpins. Using the Schoener's diet overlap index, we found a higher potential for interspecific competition in 1932 than in 2006–2008, though diet overlap was not significant in either time period. No evidence of cannibalism by lake trout or lake trout predation on burbot was found in either time period. In 2006–2008, however, lake trout composed 5.4% (by weight) of burbot diet. To determine whether this predation could be having an impact on lake trout rehabilitation efforts in northern Lake Michigan, we developed a bioenergetic-based consumption estimate for burbot on Boulder Reef (a representative reef within the Northern Refuge) and found that burbot alone can consume a considerable proportion of the yearling lake trout stocked annually, depending on burbot density. Overall, we conclude that predation, rather than competition, is the more important ecological interaction between burbot and lake trout, and burbot predation may be contributing to the failed lake trout rehabilitation efforts in Lake Michigan. Text Burbot Lota lota lota BioOne Online Journals Journal of Great Lakes Research 36 2 312 317
institution Open Polar
collection BioOne Online Journals
op_collection_id ftbioone
language English
description We used analyses of burbot (Lota lota) and lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) diets taken during spring gillnet surveys in northern Lake Michigan in 2006–2008 to investigate the potential for competition and predator-prey interactions between these two species. We also compared our results to historical data from 1932. During 2006–2008, lake trout diet consisted mainly of alewives (Alosa pseudoharengus) and rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax), whereas burbot utilized a much wider prey base including round goby (Neogobius melanostomus), rainbow smelt, alewives, and sculpins. Using the Schoener's diet overlap index, we found a higher potential for interspecific competition in 1932 than in 2006–2008, though diet overlap was not significant in either time period. No evidence of cannibalism by lake trout or lake trout predation on burbot was found in either time period. In 2006–2008, however, lake trout composed 5.4% (by weight) of burbot diet. To determine whether this predation could be having an impact on lake trout rehabilitation efforts in northern Lake Michigan, we developed a bioenergetic-based consumption estimate for burbot on Boulder Reef (a representative reef within the Northern Refuge) and found that burbot alone can consume a considerable proportion of the yearling lake trout stocked annually, depending on burbot density. Overall, we conclude that predation, rather than competition, is the more important ecological interaction between burbot and lake trout, and burbot predation may be contributing to the failed lake trout rehabilitation efforts in Lake Michigan.
author2 Gregory R. Jacobs
Charles P. Madenjian
David B. Bunnell
Jeffrey D. Holuszko
format Text
author Gregory R. Jacobs
Charles P. Madenjian
David B. Bunnell
Jeffrey D. Holuszko
spellingShingle Gregory R. Jacobs
Charles P. Madenjian
David B. Bunnell
Jeffrey D. Holuszko
Diet of Lake Trout and Burbot in Northern Lake Michigan During Spring: Evidence of Ecological Interaction
author_facet Gregory R. Jacobs
Charles P. Madenjian
David B. Bunnell
Jeffrey D. Holuszko
author_sort Gregory R. Jacobs
title Diet of Lake Trout and Burbot in Northern Lake Michigan During Spring: Evidence of Ecological Interaction
title_short Diet of Lake Trout and Burbot in Northern Lake Michigan During Spring: Evidence of Ecological Interaction
title_full Diet of Lake Trout and Burbot in Northern Lake Michigan During Spring: Evidence of Ecological Interaction
title_fullStr Diet of Lake Trout and Burbot in Northern Lake Michigan During Spring: Evidence of Ecological Interaction
title_full_unstemmed Diet of Lake Trout and Burbot in Northern Lake Michigan During Spring: Evidence of Ecological Interaction
title_sort diet of lake trout and burbot in northern lake michigan during spring: evidence of ecological interaction
publisher International Association for Great Lakes Research
publishDate 2010
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2010.02.007
op_coverage world
genre Burbot
Lota lota
lota
genre_facet Burbot
Lota lota
lota
op_source https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2010.02.007
op_relation doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2010.02.007
op_rights All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2010.02.007
container_title Journal of Great Lakes Research
container_volume 36
container_issue 2
container_start_page 312
op_container_end_page 317
_version_ 1800749283912187904