Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth

Abstract Background Birth weight for gestational age is a widely-used proxy for fetal growth. Although the need for different standards for males and females is generally acknowledged, the physiologic vs pathologic nature of ethnic differences in fetal growth is hotly debated and remains unresolved....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kierans, William J, Joseph, KS, Luo, Zhong-Cheng, Platt, Robert, Wilkins, Russell, Kramer, Michael S
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/1
id ftbiomed:oai:biomedcentral.com:1471-2393-8-1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbiomed:oai:biomedcentral.com:1471-2393-8-1 2023-05-15T16:15:59+02:00 Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth Kierans, William J Joseph, KS Luo, Zhong-Cheng Platt, Robert Wilkins, Russell Kramer, Michael S 2008-01-08 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/1 en eng BioMed Central Ltd. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/1 Copyright 2008 Kierans et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Research article 2008 ftbiomed 2008-03-22T00:10:48Z Abstract Background Birth weight for gestational age is a widely-used proxy for fetal growth. Although the need for different standards for males and females is generally acknowledged, the physiologic vs pathologic nature of ethnic differences in fetal growth is hotly debated and remains unresolved. Methods We used all stillbirth, live birth, and deterministically linked infant deaths in British Columbia from 1981 to 2000 to examine fetal growth and perinatal mortality in Chinese (n = 40,092), South Asian (n = 38,670), First Nations, i.e., North American Indian (n = 56,097), and other (n = 731,109) births. We used a new analytic approach based on total fetuses at risk to compare the four ethnic groups in perinatal mortality, mean birth weight, and "revealed" (< 10 th percentile) small-for-gestational age (SGA) among live births based on both a single standard and four ethnic-specific standards. Results Despite their lower mean birth weights and higher SGA rates (when based on a single standard), Chinese and South Asian infants had lower perinatal mortality risks throughout gestation. The opposite pattern was observed for First Nations births: higher mean birth weights, lower revealed SGA rates, and higher perinatal mortality risks. When SGA was based on ethnic-specific standards, however, the pattern was concordant with that observed for perinatal mortality. Conclusion The concordance of perinatal mortality and SGA rates when based on ethnic-specific standards, and their discordance when based on a single standard, strongly suggests that the observed ethnic differences in fetal growth are physiologic, rather than pathologic, and make a strong case for ethnic-specific standards. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations BioMed Central Indian
institution Open Polar
collection BioMed Central
op_collection_id ftbiomed
language English
description Abstract Background Birth weight for gestational age is a widely-used proxy for fetal growth. Although the need for different standards for males and females is generally acknowledged, the physiologic vs pathologic nature of ethnic differences in fetal growth is hotly debated and remains unresolved. Methods We used all stillbirth, live birth, and deterministically linked infant deaths in British Columbia from 1981 to 2000 to examine fetal growth and perinatal mortality in Chinese (n = 40,092), South Asian (n = 38,670), First Nations, i.e., North American Indian (n = 56,097), and other (n = 731,109) births. We used a new analytic approach based on total fetuses at risk to compare the four ethnic groups in perinatal mortality, mean birth weight, and "revealed" (< 10 th percentile) small-for-gestational age (SGA) among live births based on both a single standard and four ethnic-specific standards. Results Despite their lower mean birth weights and higher SGA rates (when based on a single standard), Chinese and South Asian infants had lower perinatal mortality risks throughout gestation. The opposite pattern was observed for First Nations births: higher mean birth weights, lower revealed SGA rates, and higher perinatal mortality risks. When SGA was based on ethnic-specific standards, however, the pattern was concordant with that observed for perinatal mortality. Conclusion The concordance of perinatal mortality and SGA rates when based on ethnic-specific standards, and their discordance when based on a single standard, strongly suggests that the observed ethnic differences in fetal growth are physiologic, rather than pathologic, and make a strong case for ethnic-specific standards.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kierans, William J
Joseph, KS
Luo, Zhong-Cheng
Platt, Robert
Wilkins, Russell
Kramer, Michael S
spellingShingle Kierans, William J
Joseph, KS
Luo, Zhong-Cheng
Platt, Robert
Wilkins, Russell
Kramer, Michael S
Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth
author_facet Kierans, William J
Joseph, KS
Luo, Zhong-Cheng
Platt, Robert
Wilkins, Russell
Kramer, Michael S
author_sort Kierans, William J
title Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth
title_short Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth
title_full Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth
title_fullStr Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth
title_full_unstemmed Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth
title_sort does one size fit all? the case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth
publisher BioMed Central Ltd.
publishDate 2008
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/1
geographic Indian
geographic_facet Indian
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/1
op_rights Copyright 2008 Kierans et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
_version_ 1766001854933630976