Empirical evaluation of humpback whale telomere length estimates; quality control and factors causing variability in the singleplex and multiplex qPCR methods
Abstract Background Telomeres, the protective cap of chromosomes, have emerged as powerful markers of biological age and life history in model and non-model species. The qPCR method for telomere length estimation is one of the most common methods for telomere length estimation, but has received rece...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BioMed Central Ltd.
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/13/77 |
id |
ftbiomed:oai:biomedcentral.com:1471-2156-13-77 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftbiomed:oai:biomedcentral.com:1471-2156-13-77 2023-05-15T16:35:59+02:00 Empirical evaluation of humpback whale telomere length estimates; quality control and factors causing variability in the singleplex and multiplex qPCR methods Olsen, Morten Bérubé, Martine Robbins, Jooke Palsbøll, Per J 2012-09-06 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/13/77 en eng BioMed Central Ltd. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/13/77 Copyright 2012 Olsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Quantitative PCR Telomere length Quality control Non-model species Guidelines Research article 2012 ftbiomed 2012-11-11T00:57:45Z Abstract Background Telomeres, the protective cap of chromosomes, have emerged as powerful markers of biological age and life history in model and non-model species. The qPCR method for telomere length estimation is one of the most common methods for telomere length estimation, but has received recent critique for being too error-prone and yielding unreliable results. This critique coincides with an increasing awareness of the potentials and limitations of the qPCR technique in general and the proposal of a general set of guidelines (MIQE) for standardization of experimental, analytical, and reporting steps of qPCR. In order to evaluate the utility of the qPCR method for telomere length estimation in non-model species, we carried out four different qPCR assays directed at humpback whale telomeres, and subsequently performed a rigorous quality control to evaluate the performance of each assay. Results Performance differed substantially among assays and only one assay was found useful for telomere length estimation in humpback whales. The most notable factors causing these inter-assay differences were primer design and choice of using singleplex or multiplex assays. Inferred amplification efficiencies differed by up to 40% depending on assay and quantification method, however this variation only affected telomere length estimates in the worst performing assays. Conclusion Our results suggest that seemingly well performing qPCR assays may contain biases that will only be detected by extensive quality control. Moreover, we show that the qPCR method for telomere length estimation can be highly precise and accurate, and thus suitable for telomere measurement in non-model species, if effort is devoted to optimization at all experimental and analytical steps. We conclude by highlighting a set of quality controls which may serve for further standardization of the qPCR method for telomere length estimation, and discuss some of the factors that may cause variation in qPCR experiments. Article in Journal/Newspaper Humpback Whale BioMed Central |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
BioMed Central |
op_collection_id |
ftbiomed |
language |
English |
topic |
Quantitative PCR Telomere length Quality control Non-model species Guidelines |
spellingShingle |
Quantitative PCR Telomere length Quality control Non-model species Guidelines Olsen, Morten Bérubé, Martine Robbins, Jooke Palsbøll, Per J Empirical evaluation of humpback whale telomere length estimates; quality control and factors causing variability in the singleplex and multiplex qPCR methods |
topic_facet |
Quantitative PCR Telomere length Quality control Non-model species Guidelines |
description |
Abstract Background Telomeres, the protective cap of chromosomes, have emerged as powerful markers of biological age and life history in model and non-model species. The qPCR method for telomere length estimation is one of the most common methods for telomere length estimation, but has received recent critique for being too error-prone and yielding unreliable results. This critique coincides with an increasing awareness of the potentials and limitations of the qPCR technique in general and the proposal of a general set of guidelines (MIQE) for standardization of experimental, analytical, and reporting steps of qPCR. In order to evaluate the utility of the qPCR method for telomere length estimation in non-model species, we carried out four different qPCR assays directed at humpback whale telomeres, and subsequently performed a rigorous quality control to evaluate the performance of each assay. Results Performance differed substantially among assays and only one assay was found useful for telomere length estimation in humpback whales. The most notable factors causing these inter-assay differences were primer design and choice of using singleplex or multiplex assays. Inferred amplification efficiencies differed by up to 40% depending on assay and quantification method, however this variation only affected telomere length estimates in the worst performing assays. Conclusion Our results suggest that seemingly well performing qPCR assays may contain biases that will only be detected by extensive quality control. Moreover, we show that the qPCR method for telomere length estimation can be highly precise and accurate, and thus suitable for telomere measurement in non-model species, if effort is devoted to optimization at all experimental and analytical steps. We conclude by highlighting a set of quality controls which may serve for further standardization of the qPCR method for telomere length estimation, and discuss some of the factors that may cause variation in qPCR experiments. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Olsen, Morten Bérubé, Martine Robbins, Jooke Palsbøll, Per J |
author_facet |
Olsen, Morten Bérubé, Martine Robbins, Jooke Palsbøll, Per J |
author_sort |
Olsen, Morten |
title |
Empirical evaluation of humpback whale telomere length estimates; quality control and factors causing variability in the singleplex and multiplex qPCR methods |
title_short |
Empirical evaluation of humpback whale telomere length estimates; quality control and factors causing variability in the singleplex and multiplex qPCR methods |
title_full |
Empirical evaluation of humpback whale telomere length estimates; quality control and factors causing variability in the singleplex and multiplex qPCR methods |
title_fullStr |
Empirical evaluation of humpback whale telomere length estimates; quality control and factors causing variability in the singleplex and multiplex qPCR methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Empirical evaluation of humpback whale telomere length estimates; quality control and factors causing variability in the singleplex and multiplex qPCR methods |
title_sort |
empirical evaluation of humpback whale telomere length estimates; quality control and factors causing variability in the singleplex and multiplex qpcr methods |
publisher |
BioMed Central Ltd. |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/13/77 |
genre |
Humpback Whale |
genre_facet |
Humpback Whale |
op_relation |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/13/77 |
op_rights |
Copyright 2012 Olsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
_version_ |
1766026296531353600 |