The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales

Abstract Background We recently reported (Curr Biol 22:683–688, 2012) that the eyes of giant and colossal squid can grow to three times the diameter of the eyes of any other animal, including large fishes and whales. As an explanation to this extreme absolute eye size, we developed a theory for visu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nilsson, Dan-E, Warrant, Eric J, Johnsen, Sönke, Hanlon, Roger T, Shashar, Nadav
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/187
id ftbiomed:oai:biomedcentral.com:1471-2148-13-187
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbiomed:oai:biomedcentral.com:1471-2148-13-187 2023-05-15T15:55:50+02:00 The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales Nilsson, Dan-E Warrant, Eric J Johnsen, Sönke Hanlon, Roger T Shashar, Nadav 2013-09-08 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/187 en eng BioMed Central Ltd. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/187 Copyright 2013 Nilsson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Vision Eyes Giant squid Sperm whale Bioluminescence Mesopelagic Correspondence 2013 ftbiomed 2013-09-15T00:17:11Z Abstract Background We recently reported (Curr Biol 22:683–688, 2012) that the eyes of giant and colossal squid can grow to three times the diameter of the eyes of any other animal, including large fishes and whales. As an explanation to this extreme absolute eye size, we developed a theory for visual performance in aquatic habitats, leading to the conclusion that the huge eyes of giant and colossal squid are uniquely suited for detection of sperm whales, which are important squid-predators in the depths where these squid live. A paper in this journal by Schmitz et al. (BMC Evol Biol 13:45, 2013) refutes our conclusions on the basis of two claims: (1) using allometric data they argue that the eyes of giant and colossal squid are not unexpectedly large for the size of the squid, and (2) a revision of the values used for modelling indicates that large eyes are not better for detection of approaching sperm whales than they are for any other task. Results and conclusions We agree with Schmitz et al. that their revised values for intensity and abundance of planktonic bioluminescence may be more realistic, or at least more appropriately conservative, but argue that their conclusions are incorrect because they have not considered some of the main arguments put forward in our paper. We also present new modelling to demonstrate that our conclusions remain robust, even with the revised input values suggested by Schmitz et al. Other/Unknown Material Colossal Squid Sperm whale BioMed Central
institution Open Polar
collection BioMed Central
op_collection_id ftbiomed
language English
topic Vision
Eyes
Giant squid
Sperm whale
Bioluminescence
Mesopelagic
spellingShingle Vision
Eyes
Giant squid
Sperm whale
Bioluminescence
Mesopelagic
Nilsson, Dan-E
Warrant, Eric J
Johnsen, Sönke
Hanlon, Roger T
Shashar, Nadav
The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
topic_facet Vision
Eyes
Giant squid
Sperm whale
Bioluminescence
Mesopelagic
description Abstract Background We recently reported (Curr Biol 22:683–688, 2012) that the eyes of giant and colossal squid can grow to three times the diameter of the eyes of any other animal, including large fishes and whales. As an explanation to this extreme absolute eye size, we developed a theory for visual performance in aquatic habitats, leading to the conclusion that the huge eyes of giant and colossal squid are uniquely suited for detection of sperm whales, which are important squid-predators in the depths where these squid live. A paper in this journal by Schmitz et al. (BMC Evol Biol 13:45, 2013) refutes our conclusions on the basis of two claims: (1) using allometric data they argue that the eyes of giant and colossal squid are not unexpectedly large for the size of the squid, and (2) a revision of the values used for modelling indicates that large eyes are not better for detection of approaching sperm whales than they are for any other task. Results and conclusions We agree with Schmitz et al. that their revised values for intensity and abundance of planktonic bioluminescence may be more realistic, or at least more appropriately conservative, but argue that their conclusions are incorrect because they have not considered some of the main arguments put forward in our paper. We also present new modelling to demonstrate that our conclusions remain robust, even with the revised input values suggested by Schmitz et al.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Nilsson, Dan-E
Warrant, Eric J
Johnsen, Sönke
Hanlon, Roger T
Shashar, Nadav
author_facet Nilsson, Dan-E
Warrant, Eric J
Johnsen, Sönke
Hanlon, Roger T
Shashar, Nadav
author_sort Nilsson, Dan-E
title The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
title_short The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
title_full The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
title_fullStr The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
title_full_unstemmed The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
title_sort giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
publisher BioMed Central Ltd.
publishDate 2013
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/187
genre Colossal Squid
Sperm whale
genre_facet Colossal Squid
Sperm whale
op_relation http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/187
op_rights Copyright 2013 Nilsson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
_version_ 1766391334248120320