Page 16

a shark? The results were astounding (4, 19, 28) the team used six different methods to extract DNA from a Tiger shark’s jaw for temporal genomic studies, and all methods resulted in great success. Next, they ran similar tests with white shark jaws from a trophy hunt in 1912 which yielded a signific...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cdm16250.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p16250coll9/id/319
id ftbellevueunivdc:oai:cdm16250.contentdm.oclc.org:p16250coll9/319
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbellevueunivdc:oai:cdm16250.contentdm.oclc.org:p16250coll9/319 2023-05-15T16:30:21+02:00 Page 16 http://cdm16250.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p16250coll9/id/319 unknown http://cdm16250.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p16250coll9/id/319 ftbellevueunivdc 2020-01-02T12:29:32Z a shark? The results were astounding (4, 19, 28) the team used six different methods to extract DNA from a Tiger shark’s jaw for temporal genomic studies, and all methods resulted in great success. Next, they ran similar tests with white shark jaws from a trophy hunt in 1912 which yielded a significant amount of DNA. The conclusions were that the age of the sample did nothing to deter adequate findings, nearly all samples even those that where 100 years old. The team therefore concluded that archived shark samples as well as fresh ones can be used for genomic or genetic testing and also allowing shark scientists to expand elasmobranchs DNA yield (19). We can conclude from this that by studying DNA samples from ancient and living sharks we can learn more of their genetic makeup and even go so far as to replicate their impressive immune capabilities (13, 19). This gives scientists means to determine the longevity of ancient species of sharks, and by doing so they can compare the life longevity of modern and prehistoric species. However, new information discovered by lead scientist marine Biologist Julius Nielsen from the University of Copenhagen used carbon dating to determine the age of a specific female Greenland shark as well as 28 other individuals, and the results where incredible. The idea to resort to carbon dating came because the band theory proved useless since the specimen’s vertebrae had no rings to measure. Taking a leaf out of archeology’s book, the team decided to give carbon dating a try; this would only be applicable to fresh specimens, though, because without a fresh sample there is no true way to determine age as a result of bone structure—or lack thereof. Since carbon dating is the process of extracting DNA from fossilized material, the issue with carbon dating ancient sharks is that they do not have any fossilized bones to date. Apart from their teeth, the cartilage skeleton will completely brake down over time. A beautiful 16 | P a g e Other/Unknown Material Greenland Bellevue University: Digital Archive Collection Greenland
institution Open Polar
collection Bellevue University: Digital Archive Collection
op_collection_id ftbellevueunivdc
language unknown
description a shark? The results were astounding (4, 19, 28) the team used six different methods to extract DNA from a Tiger shark’s jaw for temporal genomic studies, and all methods resulted in great success. Next, they ran similar tests with white shark jaws from a trophy hunt in 1912 which yielded a significant amount of DNA. The conclusions were that the age of the sample did nothing to deter adequate findings, nearly all samples even those that where 100 years old. The team therefore concluded that archived shark samples as well as fresh ones can be used for genomic or genetic testing and also allowing shark scientists to expand elasmobranchs DNA yield (19). We can conclude from this that by studying DNA samples from ancient and living sharks we can learn more of their genetic makeup and even go so far as to replicate their impressive immune capabilities (13, 19). This gives scientists means to determine the longevity of ancient species of sharks, and by doing so they can compare the life longevity of modern and prehistoric species. However, new information discovered by lead scientist marine Biologist Julius Nielsen from the University of Copenhagen used carbon dating to determine the age of a specific female Greenland shark as well as 28 other individuals, and the results where incredible. The idea to resort to carbon dating came because the band theory proved useless since the specimen’s vertebrae had no rings to measure. Taking a leaf out of archeology’s book, the team decided to give carbon dating a try; this would only be applicable to fresh specimens, though, because without a fresh sample there is no true way to determine age as a result of bone structure—or lack thereof. Since carbon dating is the process of extracting DNA from fossilized material, the issue with carbon dating ancient sharks is that they do not have any fossilized bones to date. Apart from their teeth, the cartilage skeleton will completely brake down over time. A beautiful 16 | P a g e
title Page 16
spellingShingle Page 16
title_short Page 16
title_full Page 16
title_fullStr Page 16
title_full_unstemmed Page 16
title_sort page 16
url http://cdm16250.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p16250coll9/id/319
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_relation http://cdm16250.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p16250coll9/id/319
_version_ 1766020076406833152