A comparison of two Antarctic ice sheet models applied to the glacial cycles

We compared two 3-D thermomechanic Antarctic ice-sheet models that dealexplicitly with the coupled ice-sheet/ice-shelf system as part of the EISMINTModel Intercomparison exercise. Both models are similar in their treatmentof grounded ice, but dier in the way grounding-line dynamics are accountedfor....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huybrechts, Philippe, Ritz, C.
Format: Conference Object
Language:unknown
Published: 1999
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/6994/
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.17539
id ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:6994
record_format openpolar
spelling ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:6994 2023-09-05T13:13:46+02:00 A comparison of two Antarctic ice sheet models applied to the glacial cycles Huybrechts, Philippe Ritz, C. 1999 https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/6994/ https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.17539 unknown Huybrechts, P. and Ritz, C. (1999) A comparison of two Antarctic ice sheet models applied to the glacial cycles , European Geophysical Society XXIV General Assembly, Den Haag (NL)April 1999. . hdl:10013/epic.17539 EPIC3European Geophysical Society XXIV General Assembly, Den Haag (NL)April 1999., 19 Conference notRev 1999 ftawi 2023-08-22T19:46:28Z We compared two 3-D thermomechanic Antarctic ice-sheet models that dealexplicitly with the coupled ice-sheet/ice-shelf system as part of the EISMINTModel Intercomparison exercise. Both models are similar in their treatmentof grounded ice, but dier in the way grounding-line dynamics are accountedfor. The grounding zone is treated either as a special case where all stressesare incorporated in the effective stress of the ow law (Huybrechts model), or as a 'shelfy stream' conditional on effective normal pressure and/or basal shear stress at the margin (Ritz et al. model, unpublished). Model tests dealt with simulations of the present ice sheet and of its behaviour during the last two glacial cycles, both for prescribed datasets and parameters as well as forpreferred input data. The major difference between the two models concerned the amplitude and chronology of the last glacial-interglacial transition, which affects the evolution of all other variables in the ice sheet. Also large marginal areas of low surface slopes and high velocities occurred at times in the Grenoble model, but were absent in the Huybrechts model. Results are discussed with special emphasis on variables important for interpreting and locating ice cores. Conference Object Antarc* Antarctic Ice Sheet Ice Shelf Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center) Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center)
op_collection_id ftawi
language unknown
description We compared two 3-D thermomechanic Antarctic ice-sheet models that dealexplicitly with the coupled ice-sheet/ice-shelf system as part of the EISMINTModel Intercomparison exercise. Both models are similar in their treatmentof grounded ice, but dier in the way grounding-line dynamics are accountedfor. The grounding zone is treated either as a special case where all stressesare incorporated in the effective stress of the ow law (Huybrechts model), or as a 'shelfy stream' conditional on effective normal pressure and/or basal shear stress at the margin (Ritz et al. model, unpublished). Model tests dealt with simulations of the present ice sheet and of its behaviour during the last two glacial cycles, both for prescribed datasets and parameters as well as forpreferred input data. The major difference between the two models concerned the amplitude and chronology of the last glacial-interglacial transition, which affects the evolution of all other variables in the ice sheet. Also large marginal areas of low surface slopes and high velocities occurred at times in the Grenoble model, but were absent in the Huybrechts model. Results are discussed with special emphasis on variables important for interpreting and locating ice cores.
format Conference Object
author Huybrechts, Philippe
Ritz, C.
spellingShingle Huybrechts, Philippe
Ritz, C.
A comparison of two Antarctic ice sheet models applied to the glacial cycles
author_facet Huybrechts, Philippe
Ritz, C.
author_sort Huybrechts, Philippe
title A comparison of two Antarctic ice sheet models applied to the glacial cycles
title_short A comparison of two Antarctic ice sheet models applied to the glacial cycles
title_full A comparison of two Antarctic ice sheet models applied to the glacial cycles
title_fullStr A comparison of two Antarctic ice sheet models applied to the glacial cycles
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two Antarctic ice sheet models applied to the glacial cycles
title_sort comparison of two antarctic ice sheet models applied to the glacial cycles
publishDate 1999
url https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/6994/
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.17539
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Ice Sheet
Ice Shelf
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Ice Sheet
Ice Shelf
op_source EPIC3European Geophysical Society XXIV General Assembly, Den Haag (NL)April 1999., 19
op_relation Huybrechts, P. and Ritz, C. (1999) A comparison of two Antarctic ice sheet models applied to the glacial cycles , European Geophysical Society XXIV General Assembly, Den Haag (NL)April 1999. . hdl:10013/epic.17539
_version_ 1776204938791092224