Sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere climate to ice—ocean interface heat flux parameterizations
We investigate the impact of three different parameterizations of ice–ocean heat exchange on modeled sea ice thickness, sea ice concentration, and water masses. These three parameterizations are (1) an ice bath assumption with the ocean temperature fixed at the freezing temperature; (2) a two-equati...
Published in: | Geoscientific Model Development |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Copernicus GmbH
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/56574/ https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/4891/2021/ https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.0455b55a-7a08-4de4-8230-6f6567acfef5 |
id |
ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:56574 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:56574 2023-05-15T13:15:07+02:00 Sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere climate to ice—ocean interface heat flux parameterizations Shi, Xiaoxu Notz, Dirk Liu, Jiping Yang, Hu Lohmann, Gerrit 2021-06-25 https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/56574/ https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/4891/2021/ https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.0455b55a-7a08-4de4-8230-6f6567acfef5 unknown Copernicus GmbH Shi, X. orcid:0000-0001-7793-9639 , Notz, D. , Liu, J. , Yang, H. orcid:0000-0003-2054-2256 and Lohmann, G. orcid:0000-0003-2089-733X , Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany, Institute for Oceanography, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, Department Ocean in the Earth System Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany, Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University at Albany, New York, USA (2021) Sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere climate to ice—ocean interface heat flux parameterizations , Geoscientific Model Development, 14 (8), pp. 4891-4908 . doi:10.5194/gmd-14-4891-2021 <https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4891-2021> , hdl:10013/epic.0455b55a-7a08-4de4-8230-6f6567acfef5 EPIC3Geoscientific Model Development, Copernicus GmbH, 14(8), pp. 4891-4908 Article NonPeerReviewed 2021 ftawi https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4891-2021 2022-07-31T23:12:18Z We investigate the impact of three different parameterizations of ice–ocean heat exchange on modeled sea ice thickness, sea ice concentration, and water masses. These three parameterizations are (1) an ice bath assumption with the ocean temperature fixed at the freezing temperature; (2) a two-equation turbulent heat flux parameterization with ice–ocean heat exchange depending linearly on the temperature difference between the underlying ocean and the ice–ocean interface, whose temperature is kept at the freezing point of the seawater; and (3) a three-equation turbulent heat flux approach in which the ice–ocean heat flux depends on the temperature difference between the underlying ocean and the ice–ocean interface, whose temperature is calculated based on the local salinity set by the ice ablation rate. Based on model simulations with the stand-alone sea ice model CICE, the ice–ocean model MPIOM, and the climate model COSMOS, we find that compared to the most complex parameterization (3), the approaches (1) and (2) result in thinner Arctic sea ice, cooler water beneath high-concentration ice and warmer water towards the ice edge, and a lower salinity in the Arctic Ocean mixed layer. In particular, parameterization (1) results in the smallest sea ice thickness among the three parameterizations, as in this parameterization all potential heat in the underlying ocean is used for the melting of the sea ice above. For the same reason, the upper ocean layer of the central Arctic is cooler when using parameterization (1) compared to (2) and (3). Finally, in the fully coupled climate model COSMOS, parameterizations (1) and (2) result in a fairly similar oceanic or atmospheric circulation. In contrast, the most realistic parameterization (3) leads to an enhanced Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC), a more positive North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) mode and a weakened Aleutian Low. Article in Journal/Newspaper aleutian low Arctic Arctic Ocean North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation Sea ice Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center) Arctic Arctic Ocean Geoscientific Model Development 14 8 4891 4908 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center) |
op_collection_id |
ftawi |
language |
unknown |
description |
We investigate the impact of three different parameterizations of ice–ocean heat exchange on modeled sea ice thickness, sea ice concentration, and water masses. These three parameterizations are (1) an ice bath assumption with the ocean temperature fixed at the freezing temperature; (2) a two-equation turbulent heat flux parameterization with ice–ocean heat exchange depending linearly on the temperature difference between the underlying ocean and the ice–ocean interface, whose temperature is kept at the freezing point of the seawater; and (3) a three-equation turbulent heat flux approach in which the ice–ocean heat flux depends on the temperature difference between the underlying ocean and the ice–ocean interface, whose temperature is calculated based on the local salinity set by the ice ablation rate. Based on model simulations with the stand-alone sea ice model CICE, the ice–ocean model MPIOM, and the climate model COSMOS, we find that compared to the most complex parameterization (3), the approaches (1) and (2) result in thinner Arctic sea ice, cooler water beneath high-concentration ice and warmer water towards the ice edge, and a lower salinity in the Arctic Ocean mixed layer. In particular, parameterization (1) results in the smallest sea ice thickness among the three parameterizations, as in this parameterization all potential heat in the underlying ocean is used for the melting of the sea ice above. For the same reason, the upper ocean layer of the central Arctic is cooler when using parameterization (1) compared to (2) and (3). Finally, in the fully coupled climate model COSMOS, parameterizations (1) and (2) result in a fairly similar oceanic or atmospheric circulation. In contrast, the most realistic parameterization (3) leads to an enhanced Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC), a more positive North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) mode and a weakened Aleutian Low. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Shi, Xiaoxu Notz, Dirk Liu, Jiping Yang, Hu Lohmann, Gerrit |
spellingShingle |
Shi, Xiaoxu Notz, Dirk Liu, Jiping Yang, Hu Lohmann, Gerrit Sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere climate to ice—ocean interface heat flux parameterizations |
author_facet |
Shi, Xiaoxu Notz, Dirk Liu, Jiping Yang, Hu Lohmann, Gerrit |
author_sort |
Shi, Xiaoxu |
title |
Sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere climate to ice—ocean interface heat flux parameterizations |
title_short |
Sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere climate to ice—ocean interface heat flux parameterizations |
title_full |
Sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere climate to ice—ocean interface heat flux parameterizations |
title_fullStr |
Sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere climate to ice—ocean interface heat flux parameterizations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere climate to ice—ocean interface heat flux parameterizations |
title_sort |
sensitivity of northern hemisphere climate to ice—ocean interface heat flux parameterizations |
publisher |
Copernicus GmbH |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/56574/ https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/4891/2021/ https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.0455b55a-7a08-4de4-8230-6f6567acfef5 |
geographic |
Arctic Arctic Ocean |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Arctic Ocean |
genre |
aleutian low Arctic Arctic Ocean North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation Sea ice |
genre_facet |
aleutian low Arctic Arctic Ocean North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation Sea ice |
op_source |
EPIC3Geoscientific Model Development, Copernicus GmbH, 14(8), pp. 4891-4908 |
op_relation |
Shi, X. orcid:0000-0001-7793-9639 , Notz, D. , Liu, J. , Yang, H. orcid:0000-0003-2054-2256 and Lohmann, G. orcid:0000-0003-2089-733X , Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany, Institute for Oceanography, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, Department Ocean in the Earth System Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany, Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University at Albany, New York, USA (2021) Sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere climate to ice—ocean interface heat flux parameterizations , Geoscientific Model Development, 14 (8), pp. 4891-4908 . doi:10.5194/gmd-14-4891-2021 <https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4891-2021> , hdl:10013/epic.0455b55a-7a08-4de4-8230-6f6567acfef5 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4891-2021 |
container_title |
Geoscientific Model Development |
container_volume |
14 |
container_issue |
8 |
container_start_page |
4891 |
op_container_end_page |
4908 |
_version_ |
1766267010517303296 |