Ocean Model Formulation Influences Transient Climate Response

The transient climate response (TCR) is 20% higher in the Alfred Wegener Institute Climate Model (AWI-CM) compared to the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM) whereas the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) is by up to 10% higher in AWI-CM. These results are largely independent of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Main Authors: Semmler, Tido, Jungclaus, Johann, Danek, Christopher, Goessling, Helge F., Koldunov, Nikolay V., Rackow, Thomas, Sidorenko, D.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Wiley 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/56472/
https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/56472/1/Semmler_2021_JGR.pdf
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021JC017633
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.3fe4c724-8f42-480f-8c6b-6f8628812a50
id ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:56472
record_format openpolar
spelling ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:56472 2024-09-15T17:36:36+00:00 Ocean Model Formulation Influences Transient Climate Response Semmler, Tido Jungclaus, Johann Danek, Christopher Goessling, Helge F. Koldunov, Nikolay V. Rackow, Thomas Sidorenko, D. 2021-11-21 application/pdf https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/56472/ https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/56472/1/Semmler_2021_JGR.pdf https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021JC017633 https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.3fe4c724-8f42-480f-8c6b-6f8628812a50 unknown Wiley https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/56472/1/Semmler_2021_JGR.pdf Semmler, T. orcid:0000-0002-2254-4901 , Jungclaus, J. , Danek, C. orcid:0000-0002-4453-1140 , Goessling, H. F. orcid:0000-0001-9018-1383 , Koldunov, N. V. orcid:0000-0002-3365-8146 , Rackow, T. orcid:0000-0002-5468-575X and Sidorenko, D. orcid:0000-0001-8579-6068 (2021) Ocean Model Formulation Influences Transient Climate Response , Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 126 (12), e2021JC017633 . doi:10.1029/2021JC017633 <https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC017633> , hdl:10013/epic.3fe4c724-8f42-480f-8c6b-6f8628812a50 EPIC3Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, Wiley, 126(12), pp. e2021JC017633, ISSN: 0148-0227 Article NonPeerReviewed 2021 ftawi https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC017633 2024-06-24T04:28:46Z The transient climate response (TCR) is 20% higher in the Alfred Wegener Institute Climate Model (AWI-CM) compared to the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM) whereas the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) is by up to 10% higher in AWI-CM. These results are largely independent of the two considered model resolutions for each model. The two coupled CMIP6 models share the same atmosphere-land component ECHAM6.3 developed at the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M). However, ECHAM6.3 is coupled to two different ocean models, namely the MPIOM sea ice-ocean model developed at MPI-M and the FESOM sea ice-ocean model developed at the Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI). A reason for the different TCR is related to ocean heat uptake in response to greenhouse gas forcing. Specifically, AWI-CM simulations show stronger surface heating than MPI-ESM simulations while the latter accumulate more heat in the deeper ocean. The vertically integrated ocean heat content is increasing slower in AWI-CM model configurations compared to MPI-ESM model configurations in the high latitudes. Weaker vertical mixing in AWI-CM model configurations compared to MPI-ESM model configurations seems to be key for these differences. The strongest difference in vertical ocean mixing occurs inside the Weddell and Ross Gyres and the northern North Atlantic. Over the North Atlantic, these differences materialize in a lack of a warming hole in AWI-CM model configurations and the presence of a warming hole in MPI-ESM model configurations. All these differences occur largely independent of the considered model resolutions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alfred Wegener Institute North Atlantic Sea ice Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center) Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 126 12
institution Open Polar
collection Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center)
op_collection_id ftawi
language unknown
description The transient climate response (TCR) is 20% higher in the Alfred Wegener Institute Climate Model (AWI-CM) compared to the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM) whereas the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) is by up to 10% higher in AWI-CM. These results are largely independent of the two considered model resolutions for each model. The two coupled CMIP6 models share the same atmosphere-land component ECHAM6.3 developed at the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M). However, ECHAM6.3 is coupled to two different ocean models, namely the MPIOM sea ice-ocean model developed at MPI-M and the FESOM sea ice-ocean model developed at the Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI). A reason for the different TCR is related to ocean heat uptake in response to greenhouse gas forcing. Specifically, AWI-CM simulations show stronger surface heating than MPI-ESM simulations while the latter accumulate more heat in the deeper ocean. The vertically integrated ocean heat content is increasing slower in AWI-CM model configurations compared to MPI-ESM model configurations in the high latitudes. Weaker vertical mixing in AWI-CM model configurations compared to MPI-ESM model configurations seems to be key for these differences. The strongest difference in vertical ocean mixing occurs inside the Weddell and Ross Gyres and the northern North Atlantic. Over the North Atlantic, these differences materialize in a lack of a warming hole in AWI-CM model configurations and the presence of a warming hole in MPI-ESM model configurations. All these differences occur largely independent of the considered model resolutions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Semmler, Tido
Jungclaus, Johann
Danek, Christopher
Goessling, Helge F.
Koldunov, Nikolay V.
Rackow, Thomas
Sidorenko, D.
spellingShingle Semmler, Tido
Jungclaus, Johann
Danek, Christopher
Goessling, Helge F.
Koldunov, Nikolay V.
Rackow, Thomas
Sidorenko, D.
Ocean Model Formulation Influences Transient Climate Response
author_facet Semmler, Tido
Jungclaus, Johann
Danek, Christopher
Goessling, Helge F.
Koldunov, Nikolay V.
Rackow, Thomas
Sidorenko, D.
author_sort Semmler, Tido
title Ocean Model Formulation Influences Transient Climate Response
title_short Ocean Model Formulation Influences Transient Climate Response
title_full Ocean Model Formulation Influences Transient Climate Response
title_fullStr Ocean Model Formulation Influences Transient Climate Response
title_full_unstemmed Ocean Model Formulation Influences Transient Climate Response
title_sort ocean model formulation influences transient climate response
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/56472/
https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/56472/1/Semmler_2021_JGR.pdf
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021JC017633
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.3fe4c724-8f42-480f-8c6b-6f8628812a50
genre Alfred Wegener Institute
North Atlantic
Sea ice
genre_facet Alfred Wegener Institute
North Atlantic
Sea ice
op_source EPIC3Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, Wiley, 126(12), pp. e2021JC017633, ISSN: 0148-0227
op_relation https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/56472/1/Semmler_2021_JGR.pdf
Semmler, T. orcid:0000-0002-2254-4901 , Jungclaus, J. , Danek, C. orcid:0000-0002-4453-1140 , Goessling, H. F. orcid:0000-0001-9018-1383 , Koldunov, N. V. orcid:0000-0002-3365-8146 , Rackow, T. orcid:0000-0002-5468-575X and Sidorenko, D. orcid:0000-0001-8579-6068 (2021) Ocean Model Formulation Influences Transient Climate Response , Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 126 (12), e2021JC017633 . doi:10.1029/2021JC017633 <https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC017633> , hdl:10013/epic.3fe4c724-8f42-480f-8c6b-6f8628812a50
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC017633
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
container_volume 126
container_issue 12
_version_ 1810490605513474048