An Assessment of State-of-the-Art Mean Sea Surface and Geoid Models of the Arctic Ocean: Implications for Sea Ice Freeboard Retrieval

• Published in: Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
• Main Authors: Skourup, Henriette, Farell, Sinead, Hendricks, Stefan, Ricker, Robert, Armitage, Thomas, Ridout, Andy, Andersen, Ole B., Haas, Christian, Baker, Steve
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: Wiley 2017
• Subjects: Arctic; Arctic Ocean; ice pack; Sea ice
• Online Access: https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/45703/; https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/45703/1/Skourup_et_al-2017-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Oceans.pdf; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2017JC013176/abstract?campaign=wolacceptedarticle; https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.51807; https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.51807.d001

State-of-the-art Arctic Ocean mean sea surface (MSS) models and global geoid models (GGMs) are used to support sea ice freeboard estimation from satellite altimeters, as well as in oceanographic studies such as mapping sea level anomalies and mean dynamic ocean topography. However, errors in a given model in the high frequency domain, primarily due to unresolved gravity features, can result in errors in the estimated along-track freeboard. These errors are exacerbated in areas with a sparse lead distribution in consolidated ice pack conditions. Additionally model errors can impact ocean geostrophic currents, derived from satellite altimeter data, while remaining biases in these models may impact longer-term, multi-sensor oceanographic time-series of sea level change in the Arctic. This study focuses on an assessment of five state-of-the-art Arctic MSS models (UCL13/04, DTU15/13/10) and a commonly used GGM (EGM2008). We describe errors due to unresolved gravity features, inter-satellite biases, and remaining satellite orbit errors, and their impact on the derivation of sea ice freeboard. The latest MSS models, incorporating CryoSat-2 sea surface height measurements, show improved definition of gravity features, such as the Gakkel Ridge. The standard deviation between models ranges 0.03-0.25 m. The impact of remaining MSS/GGM errors on freeboard retrieval can reach several decimeters in parts of the Arctic. While the maximum observed freeboard difference found in the central Arctic was 0.59 m (UCL13 MSS minus EGM2008 GGM), the standard deviation in freeboard differences is 0.03-0.06 m.