Soil organic carbon storage in five different arctic permafrost environments

Arctic river deltas and ice-rich permafrost regions are highly dynamic environments which will be strongly affected by future climate change. Rapid thaw of permafrost (thermokarst and thermo-erosion) may cause significant mobilization of organic carbon, which is assumed to be stored in large amounts...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fuchs, Matthias, Grosse, Guido, Jones, Benjamin M., Maximov, Georgy, Strauss, Jens
Format: Conference Object
Language:unknown
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Ice
Online Access:https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/43169/
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.49632
id ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:43169
record_format openpolar
spelling ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:43169 2023-05-15T14:26:54+02:00 Soil organic carbon storage in five different arctic permafrost environments Fuchs, Matthias Grosse, Guido Jones, Benjamin M. Maximov, Georgy Strauss, Jens 2016-12-15 https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/43169/ https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.49632 unknown Fuchs, M. orcid:0000-0003-3529-8284 , Grosse, G. orcid:0000-0001-5895-2141 , Jones, B. M. , Maximov, G. and Strauss, J. orcid:0000-0003-4678-4982 (2016) Soil organic carbon storage in five different arctic permafrost environments , AGU Fall Meeting 2016, San Francisco, 12 December 2016 - 16 December 2016 . hdl:10013/epic.49632 EPIC3AGU Fall Meeting 2016, San Francisco, 2016-12-12-2016-12-16 Conference notRev 2016 ftawi 2021-12-24T15:42:25Z Arctic river deltas and ice-rich permafrost regions are highly dynamic environments which will be strongly affected by future climate change. Rapid thaw of permafrost (thermokarst and thermo-erosion) may cause significant mobilization of organic carbon, which is assumed to be stored in large amounts in Arctic river deltas and ice-rich permafrost. This study presents and compares new data on organic carbon storage in thermokarst landforms and Arctic river delta deposits for the first two meters of soils for five different study areas in Alaska and Siberia. The sites include the Ikpikpuk river delta (North Alaska), Fish Creek river delta (North Alaska), Teshekpuk Lake Special Area (North Alaska), Sobo-Sise Island (Lena river delta, Northeast Siberia), and Bykovsky Peninsula (Northeast Siberia). Samples were taken with a SIPRE auger along transects covering the main geomorphological landscape units in the study regions. Our results show a high variability in soil organic carbon storage among the different study sites. The studied profiles in the Teshekpuk Lake Special Area – dominated by drained thermokarst lake basins – contained significantly more carbon than the other areas. The Teshekpuk Lake Special Area contains 44 ± 9 kg C/m2 (0-100 cm, mean value of profiles ± Std dev) compared to 20 ± 7 kg C/m2 kg for Sobo-Sise Island – a Yedoma dominated island intersected by thaw lake basins and 24 ± 6 kg C/m2 for the deltaic dominated areas (Fish Creek and Ikpikpuk). However, especially for the Ikpikpuk river delta, a significant amount of carbon (25 ± 9 kg C/m2) is stored in the second meter of soil (100-200cm). This study shows the importance of including deltaic and thermokarst-affected landscapes as considerable carbon pools, but indicates that these areas are heterogeneous in terms of organic carbon storage and cannot be generalized. As a next step, the site-level carbon stocks will be upscaled to the landscape level using remote sensing-based land cover classifications to calculate the carbon storage potential for Arctic deltas and larger thermokarst regions, to estimate mobilization potentials from thermokarst and thermo-erosion, and to provide input data for future permafrost carbon feedback models. Conference Object Arctic Arctic Climate change Ice lena river permafrost Thermokarst Alaska Siberia Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center) Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center)
op_collection_id ftawi
language unknown
description Arctic river deltas and ice-rich permafrost regions are highly dynamic environments which will be strongly affected by future climate change. Rapid thaw of permafrost (thermokarst and thermo-erosion) may cause significant mobilization of organic carbon, which is assumed to be stored in large amounts in Arctic river deltas and ice-rich permafrost. This study presents and compares new data on organic carbon storage in thermokarst landforms and Arctic river delta deposits for the first two meters of soils for five different study areas in Alaska and Siberia. The sites include the Ikpikpuk river delta (North Alaska), Fish Creek river delta (North Alaska), Teshekpuk Lake Special Area (North Alaska), Sobo-Sise Island (Lena river delta, Northeast Siberia), and Bykovsky Peninsula (Northeast Siberia). Samples were taken with a SIPRE auger along transects covering the main geomorphological landscape units in the study regions. Our results show a high variability in soil organic carbon storage among the different study sites. The studied profiles in the Teshekpuk Lake Special Area – dominated by drained thermokarst lake basins – contained significantly more carbon than the other areas. The Teshekpuk Lake Special Area contains 44 ± 9 kg C/m2 (0-100 cm, mean value of profiles ± Std dev) compared to 20 ± 7 kg C/m2 kg for Sobo-Sise Island – a Yedoma dominated island intersected by thaw lake basins and 24 ± 6 kg C/m2 for the deltaic dominated areas (Fish Creek and Ikpikpuk). However, especially for the Ikpikpuk river delta, a significant amount of carbon (25 ± 9 kg C/m2) is stored in the second meter of soil (100-200cm). This study shows the importance of including deltaic and thermokarst-affected landscapes as considerable carbon pools, but indicates that these areas are heterogeneous in terms of organic carbon storage and cannot be generalized. As a next step, the site-level carbon stocks will be upscaled to the landscape level using remote sensing-based land cover classifications to calculate the carbon storage potential for Arctic deltas and larger thermokarst regions, to estimate mobilization potentials from thermokarst and thermo-erosion, and to provide input data for future permafrost carbon feedback models.
format Conference Object
author Fuchs, Matthias
Grosse, Guido
Jones, Benjamin M.
Maximov, Georgy
Strauss, Jens
spellingShingle Fuchs, Matthias
Grosse, Guido
Jones, Benjamin M.
Maximov, Georgy
Strauss, Jens
Soil organic carbon storage in five different arctic permafrost environments
author_facet Fuchs, Matthias
Grosse, Guido
Jones, Benjamin M.
Maximov, Georgy
Strauss, Jens
author_sort Fuchs, Matthias
title Soil organic carbon storage in five different arctic permafrost environments
title_short Soil organic carbon storage in five different arctic permafrost environments
title_full Soil organic carbon storage in five different arctic permafrost environments
title_fullStr Soil organic carbon storage in five different arctic permafrost environments
title_full_unstemmed Soil organic carbon storage in five different arctic permafrost environments
title_sort soil organic carbon storage in five different arctic permafrost environments
publishDate 2016
url https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/43169/
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.49632
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Arctic
Climate change
Ice
lena river
permafrost
Thermokarst
Alaska
Siberia
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Climate change
Ice
lena river
permafrost
Thermokarst
Alaska
Siberia
op_source EPIC3AGU Fall Meeting 2016, San Francisco, 2016-12-12-2016-12-16
op_relation Fuchs, M. orcid:0000-0003-3529-8284 , Grosse, G. orcid:0000-0001-5895-2141 , Jones, B. M. , Maximov, G. and Strauss, J. orcid:0000-0003-4678-4982 (2016) Soil organic carbon storage in five different arctic permafrost environments , AGU Fall Meeting 2016, San Francisco, 12 December 2016 - 16 December 2016 . hdl:10013/epic.49632
_version_ 1766300376656510976