The potential of ground-based 3D GPR imaging: 2D vs. 3D examples from the Yedoma region

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) reflection imaging is a popular geophysical tool to explore subsurface structures in a non-invasive manner. In terms of GPR, reflective interfaces are defined by contrasts in dielectric permittivity, which result from, for example, variations in soil moisture or ice co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schennen, Stephan, Tronicke, Jens, Wetterich, Sebastian, Allroggen, Niklas, Schwamborn, Georg, Schirrmeister, Lutz
Format: Conference Object
Language:unknown
Published: Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research International Permafrost Association 2016
Subjects:
Ice
Online Access:https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/42030/
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.48827
id ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:42030
record_format openpolar
spelling ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:42030 2024-09-15T18:11:40+00:00 The potential of ground-based 3D GPR imaging: 2D vs. 3D examples from the Yedoma region Schennen, Stephan Tronicke, Jens Wetterich, Sebastian Allroggen, Niklas Schwamborn, Georg Schirrmeister, Lutz 2016-06 https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/42030/ https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.48827 unknown Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research International Permafrost Association Schennen, S. , Tronicke, J. , Wetterich, S. orcid:0000-0001-9234-1192 , Allroggen, N. , Schwamborn, G. and Schirrmeister, L. orcid:0000-0001-9455-0596 (2016) The potential of ground-based 3D GPR imaging: 2D vs. 3D examples from the Yedoma region , XI. International Conference On Permafrost, Potsdam, 20 June 2016 - 24 June 2016 . doi:10.2312/GFZ.LIS.2016.001 <https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.LIS.2016.001> , hdl:10013/epic.48827 EPIC3XI. International Conference On Permafrost, Potsdam, 2016-06-20-2016-06-24Potsdam, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research International Permafrost Association Conference notRev 2016 ftawi https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.LIS.2016.001 2024-06-24T04:15:36Z Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) reflection imaging is a popular geophysical tool to explore subsurface structures in a non-invasive manner. In terms of GPR, reflective interfaces are defined by contrasts in dielectric permittivity, which result from, for example, variations in soil moisture or ice content. GPR is very suitable for electrically high resistive environments, such as frozen ground (typically > 10,000 m). Here, GPR can be used to explore structural targets at depths up to tens of meters. Furthermore, GPR can be employed to explore more shallow environments where detailed information on the decimeter scale is required. In consequence, 2D GPR reflection profiling is used on different spatial scales in permafrost applications such as active layer characterization and imaging of pingos. However, a 3D strategy might be essential for obtaining a reliable image of subsurface structures, if the geometry of such targets is complex (e.g., structures vary in three dimensions). Additionally, 3D data allow to identify out-of-plane reflection events which might interfere with reflections from target structures. This advantage is especially interesting for the application of GPR in cold environments, where out-of-plane reflections are favored due to a broadened radiation characteristic of GPR antennas on frozen ground compared to unfrozen ground. Here, we present a carefully designed 3D GPR acquisition and processing strategy (Schennen et al., 2016) and employ it to an exemplary data set. Our field site covers an area of approximately 20 m×70 m and is located on top of a Yedoma hill on Bol’shoy Lyakhovsky Island, Northern Siberia. Nearby borehole information provides cryostratigraphic details (up to a depth of approximately 30 m) interpreted in terms of three major stratigraphic units. These comprise two ice complex strata, which enclose a unit of floodplain deposits. Additional ground-truth is available from a 18 m high outcrop of the upper ice complex next to our survey area. Here, we observe large (up to 10 m ... Conference Object Ice permafrost Siberia Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center)
institution Open Polar
collection Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center)
op_collection_id ftawi
language unknown
description Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) reflection imaging is a popular geophysical tool to explore subsurface structures in a non-invasive manner. In terms of GPR, reflective interfaces are defined by contrasts in dielectric permittivity, which result from, for example, variations in soil moisture or ice content. GPR is very suitable for electrically high resistive environments, such as frozen ground (typically > 10,000 m). Here, GPR can be used to explore structural targets at depths up to tens of meters. Furthermore, GPR can be employed to explore more shallow environments where detailed information on the decimeter scale is required. In consequence, 2D GPR reflection profiling is used on different spatial scales in permafrost applications such as active layer characterization and imaging of pingos. However, a 3D strategy might be essential for obtaining a reliable image of subsurface structures, if the geometry of such targets is complex (e.g., structures vary in three dimensions). Additionally, 3D data allow to identify out-of-plane reflection events which might interfere with reflections from target structures. This advantage is especially interesting for the application of GPR in cold environments, where out-of-plane reflections are favored due to a broadened radiation characteristic of GPR antennas on frozen ground compared to unfrozen ground. Here, we present a carefully designed 3D GPR acquisition and processing strategy (Schennen et al., 2016) and employ it to an exemplary data set. Our field site covers an area of approximately 20 m×70 m and is located on top of a Yedoma hill on Bol’shoy Lyakhovsky Island, Northern Siberia. Nearby borehole information provides cryostratigraphic details (up to a depth of approximately 30 m) interpreted in terms of three major stratigraphic units. These comprise two ice complex strata, which enclose a unit of floodplain deposits. Additional ground-truth is available from a 18 m high outcrop of the upper ice complex next to our survey area. Here, we observe large (up to 10 m ...
format Conference Object
author Schennen, Stephan
Tronicke, Jens
Wetterich, Sebastian
Allroggen, Niklas
Schwamborn, Georg
Schirrmeister, Lutz
spellingShingle Schennen, Stephan
Tronicke, Jens
Wetterich, Sebastian
Allroggen, Niklas
Schwamborn, Georg
Schirrmeister, Lutz
The potential of ground-based 3D GPR imaging: 2D vs. 3D examples from the Yedoma region
author_facet Schennen, Stephan
Tronicke, Jens
Wetterich, Sebastian
Allroggen, Niklas
Schwamborn, Georg
Schirrmeister, Lutz
author_sort Schennen, Stephan
title The potential of ground-based 3D GPR imaging: 2D vs. 3D examples from the Yedoma region
title_short The potential of ground-based 3D GPR imaging: 2D vs. 3D examples from the Yedoma region
title_full The potential of ground-based 3D GPR imaging: 2D vs. 3D examples from the Yedoma region
title_fullStr The potential of ground-based 3D GPR imaging: 2D vs. 3D examples from the Yedoma region
title_full_unstemmed The potential of ground-based 3D GPR imaging: 2D vs. 3D examples from the Yedoma region
title_sort potential of ground-based 3d gpr imaging: 2d vs. 3d examples from the yedoma region
publisher Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research International Permafrost Association
publishDate 2016
url https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/42030/
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.48827
genre Ice
permafrost
Siberia
genre_facet Ice
permafrost
Siberia
op_source EPIC3XI. International Conference On Permafrost, Potsdam, 2016-06-20-2016-06-24Potsdam, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research International Permafrost Association
op_relation Schennen, S. , Tronicke, J. , Wetterich, S. orcid:0000-0001-9234-1192 , Allroggen, N. , Schwamborn, G. and Schirrmeister, L. orcid:0000-0001-9455-0596 (2016) The potential of ground-based 3D GPR imaging: 2D vs. 3D examples from the Yedoma region , XI. International Conference On Permafrost, Potsdam, 20 June 2016 - 24 June 2016 . doi:10.2312/GFZ.LIS.2016.001 <https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.LIS.2016.001> , hdl:10013/epic.48827
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.LIS.2016.001
_version_ 1810449244763455488