Geotechnical Investigation of Pore Pressure Behavior of Muddy Seafloor Sediments in an Arctic Permafrost Environment

Herschel Island, Yukon, Canada, is made of ice-rich permafrost and is affected by high rates of coastal erosion, likely to increase with decreasing summer sea ice extent. During an interdisciplinary expedition to Herschel Island in July 2014, geotechnical investigations were carried out in shallow w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Volume 1: Offshore Technology; Offshore Geotechnics
Main Authors: Stark, Nina, Quinn, Brandon, Ziotopoulou, Katerina, Lantuit, Hugues
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Ice
Online Access:https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/39153/
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.46400
id ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:39153
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center)
op_collection_id ftawi
language unknown
description Herschel Island, Yukon, Canada, is made of ice-rich permafrost and is affected by high rates of coastal erosion, likely to increase with decreasing summer sea ice extent. During an interdisciplinary expedition to Herschel Island in July 2014, geotechnical investigations were carried out in shallow water environments of up to 20 m water depth and at different beaches. The free-fall penetrometer BlueDrop was deployed at 299 positions. Apart from obtaining vertical profiles of sediment strength and the pore pressure response upon impact, the pore pressure evolution over a period of one hour after deployment was investigated. The focus area for these tests was Pauline Cove, located at the south-eastern side of the island, being sheltered by a spit from the open Beaufort Sea and affected by a number of old and young retrogressive thaw slumps, delivering large amounts of mud. The sediment resistance profiles revealed up to three distinct layers of sediment strength, expressing different consolidation states, or possibly changes in sediment composition. This stratification was supported by the pore pressure results, including pore pressure evolution “on-the-flight” during penetrometer penetration as well as pore pressure evolution at maximum penetration depth with the penetrometer being at rest. The sediment surface layer 1 was characterized by a thickness of 5–20 cm depending on the respective location, low sediment resistance and predominantly hydrostatic pressure. It most likely has frequently been reworked by wave action, and exhibited similar geotechnical signatures as fluid mud. Layer 2 reached sediment depths of 30–60 cm, showed an increase in sediment resistance and distinct subhydrostatic pore pressures during penetration, while pore pressures increased in an asymptotic manner to suprahydrostatic (160–180% of hydrostatic pressure) over an observation period of 30–50 minutes. Based on comparison to other examples from the literature, it was hypothesized that layer 2 was composed of overconsolidated mud. Layer 3 featured a significant increase in sediment resistance as well as pore pressure during penetration. As soon as the probe came to rest, the pressure decreased significantly to subhydrostatic conditions, before swinging back to being suprahydrostatic and then slowly dissipating. A similar behavior has been associated to silty sands and high bulk densities. Here, it may suggest a change in sediment composition, likely influenced by coarser nearshore and beach sediments, representing also a denser sediment matrix. The pore pressure results will complement the geological and geotechnical characterization of the coastal zone of Hershel Island, and contribute to the investigation of erosion and deposition processes. Copyright © 2015 by ASME
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Stark, Nina
Quinn, Brandon
Ziotopoulou, Katerina
Lantuit, Hugues
spellingShingle Stark, Nina
Quinn, Brandon
Ziotopoulou, Katerina
Lantuit, Hugues
Geotechnical Investigation of Pore Pressure Behavior of Muddy Seafloor Sediments in an Arctic Permafrost Environment
author_facet Stark, Nina
Quinn, Brandon
Ziotopoulou, Katerina
Lantuit, Hugues
author_sort Stark, Nina
title Geotechnical Investigation of Pore Pressure Behavior of Muddy Seafloor Sediments in an Arctic Permafrost Environment
title_short Geotechnical Investigation of Pore Pressure Behavior of Muddy Seafloor Sediments in an Arctic Permafrost Environment
title_full Geotechnical Investigation of Pore Pressure Behavior of Muddy Seafloor Sediments in an Arctic Permafrost Environment
title_fullStr Geotechnical Investigation of Pore Pressure Behavior of Muddy Seafloor Sediments in an Arctic Permafrost Environment
title_full_unstemmed Geotechnical Investigation of Pore Pressure Behavior of Muddy Seafloor Sediments in an Arctic Permafrost Environment
title_sort geotechnical investigation of pore pressure behavior of muddy seafloor sediments in an arctic permafrost environment
publishDate 2015
url https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/39153/
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.46400
long_lat ENVELOPE(-139.089,-139.089,69.583,69.583)
ENVELOPE(-138.920,-138.920,69.572,69.572)
geographic Arctic
Yukon
Canada
Herschel Island
Pauline Cove
geographic_facet Arctic
Yukon
Canada
Herschel Island
Pauline Cove
genre Arctic
Arctic
Beaufort Sea
Herschel
Herschel Island
Ice
permafrost
Sea ice
Yukon
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Beaufort Sea
Herschel
Herschel Island
Ice
permafrost
Sea ice
Yukon
op_source EPIC3ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Volume, pp. 1-10
op_relation Stark, N. , Quinn, B. , Ziotopoulou, K. and Lantuit, H. orcid:0000-0003-1497-6760 (2015) Geotechnical Investigation of Pore Pressure Behavior of Muddy Seafloor Sediments in an Arctic Permafrost Environment , ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Volume , pp. 1-10 . doi:10.1115/OMAE2015-41583 <https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2015-41583> , hdl:10013/epic.46400
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2015-41583
container_title Volume 1: Offshore Technology; Offshore Geotechnics
_version_ 1766294788911398912
spelling ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:39153 2023-05-15T14:22:07+02:00 Geotechnical Investigation of Pore Pressure Behavior of Muddy Seafloor Sediments in an Arctic Permafrost Environment Stark, Nina Quinn, Brandon Ziotopoulou, Katerina Lantuit, Hugues 2015-06-05 https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/39153/ https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.46400 unknown Stark, N. , Quinn, B. , Ziotopoulou, K. and Lantuit, H. orcid:0000-0003-1497-6760 (2015) Geotechnical Investigation of Pore Pressure Behavior of Muddy Seafloor Sediments in an Arctic Permafrost Environment , ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Volume , pp. 1-10 . doi:10.1115/OMAE2015-41583 <https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2015-41583> , hdl:10013/epic.46400 EPIC3ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Volume, pp. 1-10 Article peerRev 2015 ftawi https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2015-41583 2021-12-24T15:40:54Z Herschel Island, Yukon, Canada, is made of ice-rich permafrost and is affected by high rates of coastal erosion, likely to increase with decreasing summer sea ice extent. During an interdisciplinary expedition to Herschel Island in July 2014, geotechnical investigations were carried out in shallow water environments of up to 20 m water depth and at different beaches. The free-fall penetrometer BlueDrop was deployed at 299 positions. Apart from obtaining vertical profiles of sediment strength and the pore pressure response upon impact, the pore pressure evolution over a period of one hour after deployment was investigated. The focus area for these tests was Pauline Cove, located at the south-eastern side of the island, being sheltered by a spit from the open Beaufort Sea and affected by a number of old and young retrogressive thaw slumps, delivering large amounts of mud. The sediment resistance profiles revealed up to three distinct layers of sediment strength, expressing different consolidation states, or possibly changes in sediment composition. This stratification was supported by the pore pressure results, including pore pressure evolution “on-the-flight” during penetrometer penetration as well as pore pressure evolution at maximum penetration depth with the penetrometer being at rest. The sediment surface layer 1 was characterized by a thickness of 5–20 cm depending on the respective location, low sediment resistance and predominantly hydrostatic pressure. It most likely has frequently been reworked by wave action, and exhibited similar geotechnical signatures as fluid mud. Layer 2 reached sediment depths of 30–60 cm, showed an increase in sediment resistance and distinct subhydrostatic pore pressures during penetration, while pore pressures increased in an asymptotic manner to suprahydrostatic (160–180% of hydrostatic pressure) over an observation period of 30–50 minutes. Based on comparison to other examples from the literature, it was hypothesized that layer 2 was composed of overconsolidated mud. Layer 3 featured a significant increase in sediment resistance as well as pore pressure during penetration. As soon as the probe came to rest, the pressure decreased significantly to subhydrostatic conditions, before swinging back to being suprahydrostatic and then slowly dissipating. A similar behavior has been associated to silty sands and high bulk densities. Here, it may suggest a change in sediment composition, likely influenced by coarser nearshore and beach sediments, representing also a denser sediment matrix. The pore pressure results will complement the geological and geotechnical characterization of the coastal zone of Hershel Island, and contribute to the investigation of erosion and deposition processes. Copyright © 2015 by ASME Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Beaufort Sea Herschel Herschel Island Ice permafrost Sea ice Yukon Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center) Arctic Yukon Canada Herschel Island ENVELOPE(-139.089,-139.089,69.583,69.583) Pauline Cove ENVELOPE(-138.920,-138.920,69.572,69.572) Volume 1: Offshore Technology; Offshore Geotechnics