Getting over continent ocean boundaries

The idea of a simple linear boundary between continental and oceanic crust at extended continental margins is widely recognized to be an oversimplification. Despite this, such boundaries continue to be mapped because of their perceived utility in palinspastic and plate kinematic reconstructions. To...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth-Science Reviews
Main Authors: Eagles, Graeme, Pérez-Díaz, Lucía, Scarselli, Nicola
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/39018/
https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/39018/1/Eagles_etal_COBs_2015_ESR_accepted.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.46258
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.46258.d001
id ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:39018
record_format openpolar
spelling ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:39018 2024-09-09T20:08:49+00:00 Getting over continent ocean boundaries Eagles, Graeme Pérez-Díaz, Lucía Scarselli, Nicola 2015-12 application/pdf https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/39018/ https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/39018/1/Eagles_etal_COBs_2015_ESR_accepted.pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.46258 https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.46258.d001 unknown ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/39018/1/Eagles_etal_COBs_2015_ESR_accepted.pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.46258.d001 Eagles, G. orcid:0000-0001-5325-0810 , Pérez-Díaz, L. and Scarselli, N. (2015) Getting over continent ocean boundaries , Earth-Science Reviews, 151 , pp. 244-265 . doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.10.009 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.10.009> , hdl:10013/epic.46258 EPIC3Earth-Science Reviews, ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, 151, pp. 244-265, ISSN: 0012-8252 Article isiRev 2015 ftawi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.10.009 2024-06-24T04:12:21Z The idea of a simple linear boundary between continental and oceanic crust at extended continental margins is widely recognized to be an oversimplification. Despite this, such boundaries continue to be mapped because of their perceived utility in palinspastic and plate kinematic reconstructions. To examine whether this perception is justified, we review the data and models on which basis continent ocean boundaries are interpreted, and map a set of such interpretations worldwide from more than 150 publications. The maps show that the location of the continent ocean boundary is rarely consistently estimated within the ~ 10–100 km observational uncertainty that might be expected of the geophysical data used for doing so, that this is the case regardless of whether the transition zone behind the boundary is classified as magma rich or magma poor, and that the geographical separation of estimates exceeds the width of single-study continent ocean transition zones. The average of global maximum separations across sets of three or more estimates is large (167 km) and mostly a consequence of interpretations published over the last decade. We interpret this to indicate an extra component of uncertainty that is related to authors' understanding of the range of features that are interpretable at extended continental margins. We go on to discuss the implications of this uncertainty for palinspastic and plate kinematic modelling using examples from the literature and from the South Atlantic Ocean. We conclude that a precise continent ocean boundary concept with locational uncertainty defined from the ensembles is of limited value for palinspastic reconstructions because the reconstruction process tends to bunch the ensemble within a region that is (i) of similar width to the observational uncertainties associated with continent ocean boundary estimates, (ii) narrower than the regions of uncertainty about rotated features implied by the propagation of uncertainties from plate rotation parameters, and (iii) coincident, within ... Article in Journal/Newspaper South Atlantic Ocean Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center) Earth-Science Reviews 151 244 265
institution Open Polar
collection Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center)
op_collection_id ftawi
language unknown
description The idea of a simple linear boundary between continental and oceanic crust at extended continental margins is widely recognized to be an oversimplification. Despite this, such boundaries continue to be mapped because of their perceived utility in palinspastic and plate kinematic reconstructions. To examine whether this perception is justified, we review the data and models on which basis continent ocean boundaries are interpreted, and map a set of such interpretations worldwide from more than 150 publications. The maps show that the location of the continent ocean boundary is rarely consistently estimated within the ~ 10–100 km observational uncertainty that might be expected of the geophysical data used for doing so, that this is the case regardless of whether the transition zone behind the boundary is classified as magma rich or magma poor, and that the geographical separation of estimates exceeds the width of single-study continent ocean transition zones. The average of global maximum separations across sets of three or more estimates is large (167 km) and mostly a consequence of interpretations published over the last decade. We interpret this to indicate an extra component of uncertainty that is related to authors' understanding of the range of features that are interpretable at extended continental margins. We go on to discuss the implications of this uncertainty for palinspastic and plate kinematic modelling using examples from the literature and from the South Atlantic Ocean. We conclude that a precise continent ocean boundary concept with locational uncertainty defined from the ensembles is of limited value for palinspastic reconstructions because the reconstruction process tends to bunch the ensemble within a region that is (i) of similar width to the observational uncertainties associated with continent ocean boundary estimates, (ii) narrower than the regions of uncertainty about rotated features implied by the propagation of uncertainties from plate rotation parameters, and (iii) coincident, within ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Eagles, Graeme
Pérez-Díaz, Lucía
Scarselli, Nicola
spellingShingle Eagles, Graeme
Pérez-Díaz, Lucía
Scarselli, Nicola
Getting over continent ocean boundaries
author_facet Eagles, Graeme
Pérez-Díaz, Lucía
Scarselli, Nicola
author_sort Eagles, Graeme
title Getting over continent ocean boundaries
title_short Getting over continent ocean boundaries
title_full Getting over continent ocean boundaries
title_fullStr Getting over continent ocean boundaries
title_full_unstemmed Getting over continent ocean boundaries
title_sort getting over continent ocean boundaries
publisher ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
publishDate 2015
url https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/39018/
https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/39018/1/Eagles_etal_COBs_2015_ESR_accepted.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.46258
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.46258.d001
genre South Atlantic Ocean
genre_facet South Atlantic Ocean
op_source EPIC3Earth-Science Reviews, ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, 151, pp. 244-265, ISSN: 0012-8252
op_relation https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/39018/1/Eagles_etal_COBs_2015_ESR_accepted.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.46258.d001
Eagles, G. orcid:0000-0001-5325-0810 , Pérez-Díaz, L. and Scarselli, N. (2015) Getting over continent ocean boundaries , Earth-Science Reviews, 151 , pp. 244-265 . doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.10.009 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.10.009> , hdl:10013/epic.46258
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.10.009
container_title Earth-Science Reviews
container_volume 151
container_start_page 244
op_container_end_page 265
_version_ 1809942895674785792