Intercomparison of Arctic regional climate simulations: Case studies of January and June 1990
Advances in regional climate modelling must be strongly based on analysis of physical processes in comparisonwith data. In a data-poor region such as the Arctic, this procedure may be enhanced by a community-basedapproach, that is, though collaborative analysis by several research groups. To illustr...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2000
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/2646/ https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.13230 |
id |
ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:2646 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:2646 2024-09-15T17:50:42+00:00 Intercomparison of Arctic regional climate simulations: Case studies of January and June 1990 Rinke, Annette Lynch, A. H. Dethloff, Klaus 2000 https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/2646/ https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.13230 unknown Rinke, A. orcid:0000-0002-6685-9219 , Lynch, A. H. and Dethloff, K. (2000) Intercomparison of Arctic regional climate simulations: Case studies of January and June 1990 , Journal of Geophysical Research, 105 , pp. 29669-29683 . hdl:10013/epic.13230 EPIC3Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, pp. 29669-29683 Article isiRev 2000 ftawi 2024-06-24T03:53:43Z Advances in regional climate modelling must be strongly based on analysis of physical processes in comparisonwith data. In a data-poor region such as the Arctic, this procedure may be enhanced by a community-basedapproach, that is, though collaborative analysis by several research groups. To illustrate this approach,simulations were performed with two regional climate models HIRHAM and ARCSyM, over the Arctic basin to65oN, laterally driven at the boundaries by observational analyses. It was found that both models are able toreproduce reasonably the main features of the large-scale flow and the surface parameters in the Arctic. Distinctdifferences in the simulations can be attributed to specific characteristics of the boundary layer and surfaceparameterizations which result in surface flux differences, and to the lateral moisture forcing, both of which affectmoisture availability in the atmosphere. Further disparities are associated with the additional degrees of freedomallowed in the coupled model ARCSyM. Issues of model configuration and experimental design are discussed,including domain size, grid spacing, boundary formulations, model initialization and spinup, and ensemble approaches. In order to reach definitive conclusions in a regional climate model intercomparison, ensemble simulationswith adequate spin-up and equivalent initialization of surface fields will be required. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Basin Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center) |
op_collection_id |
ftawi |
language |
unknown |
description |
Advances in regional climate modelling must be strongly based on analysis of physical processes in comparisonwith data. In a data-poor region such as the Arctic, this procedure may be enhanced by a community-basedapproach, that is, though collaborative analysis by several research groups. To illustrate this approach,simulations were performed with two regional climate models HIRHAM and ARCSyM, over the Arctic basin to65oN, laterally driven at the boundaries by observational analyses. It was found that both models are able toreproduce reasonably the main features of the large-scale flow and the surface parameters in the Arctic. Distinctdifferences in the simulations can be attributed to specific characteristics of the boundary layer and surfaceparameterizations which result in surface flux differences, and to the lateral moisture forcing, both of which affectmoisture availability in the atmosphere. Further disparities are associated with the additional degrees of freedomallowed in the coupled model ARCSyM. Issues of model configuration and experimental design are discussed,including domain size, grid spacing, boundary formulations, model initialization and spinup, and ensemble approaches. In order to reach definitive conclusions in a regional climate model intercomparison, ensemble simulationswith adequate spin-up and equivalent initialization of surface fields will be required. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Rinke, Annette Lynch, A. H. Dethloff, Klaus |
spellingShingle |
Rinke, Annette Lynch, A. H. Dethloff, Klaus Intercomparison of Arctic regional climate simulations: Case studies of January and June 1990 |
author_facet |
Rinke, Annette Lynch, A. H. Dethloff, Klaus |
author_sort |
Rinke, Annette |
title |
Intercomparison of Arctic regional climate simulations: Case studies of January and June 1990 |
title_short |
Intercomparison of Arctic regional climate simulations: Case studies of January and June 1990 |
title_full |
Intercomparison of Arctic regional climate simulations: Case studies of January and June 1990 |
title_fullStr |
Intercomparison of Arctic regional climate simulations: Case studies of January and June 1990 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intercomparison of Arctic regional climate simulations: Case studies of January and June 1990 |
title_sort |
intercomparison of arctic regional climate simulations: case studies of january and june 1990 |
publishDate |
2000 |
url |
https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/2646/ https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.13230 |
genre |
Arctic Arctic Basin |
genre_facet |
Arctic Arctic Basin |
op_source |
EPIC3Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, pp. 29669-29683 |
op_relation |
Rinke, A. orcid:0000-0002-6685-9219 , Lynch, A. H. and Dethloff, K. (2000) Intercomparison of Arctic regional climate simulations: Case studies of January and June 1990 , Journal of Geophysical Research, 105 , pp. 29669-29683 . hdl:10013/epic.13230 |
_version_ |
1810292513587593216 |