Ocean bottom pressure variability derived from different GRACE solutions

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) provides estimates of the earthÕs static and time-variant gravity field. Solutions from various processing centers (GFZ, CSR, JPL etc.) enable us to determine water mass redistributions on the globe. Given that land signals are generally large comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Böning, Carmen, Timmermann, Ralph, Macrander, Annecke, Schröter, Jens
Format: Conference Object
Language:unknown
Published: 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/19774/
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.31688
_version_ 1834370832489512960
author Böning, Carmen
Timmermann, Ralph
Macrander, Annecke
Schröter, Jens
author_facet Böning, Carmen
Timmermann, Ralph
Macrander, Annecke
Schröter, Jens
author_sort Böning, Carmen
collection Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center)
description The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) provides estimates of the earthÕs static and time-variant gravity field. Solutions from various processing centers (GFZ, CSR, JPL etc.) enable us to determine water mass redistributions on the globe. Given that land signals are generally large compared to anomalies over the ocean; an assessment of the latter requires a particularly careful filtering of the data. We utilized the Finite Element Sea-Ice Ocean Model (FESOM) to develop a filtering algorithm which relies on the spatial coherency of ocean bottom pressure (OBP) anomalies. For every position in the ocean, OBP anomalies are coherent over a considerable area. Thus, this pattern can be used to determine time series of GRACE-derived OBP anomalies at any position by weighting the time series in the vicinity with the correlation to the original time series. A global validation with in situ OBP data from a global database which has been compiled at the AWI shows that the correlation between in situ and GRACE data is improved by using the new filter in comparison to Gauss filtering.In this study we use GRACE solutions from JPL, CSR and GFZ where the correlated errors in the spherical harmonic solutions have been removed. These so-called destriped solutions are available processed with a 300 km, 500 km, and 750 km radius Gauss filter. The best correlations to the in-situ data are obtained using the 750-km Gauss filtered data. Correlation to the in-situ data can be even further improved for a combination of destriping and pattern filtering.
format Conference Object
genre Sea ice
genre_facet Sea ice
id ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:19774
institution Open Polar
language unknown
op_collection_id ftawi
op_relation Böning, C. , Timmermann, R. , Macrander, A. and Schröter, J. orcid:0000-0002-9240-5798 (2008) Ocean bottom pressure variability derived from different GRACE solutions , GRACE Science Team Meeting 2008, San Francisco, USA.-13. December 2008. . hdl:10013/epic.31688
op_source EPIC3GRACE Science Team Meeting 2008, San Francisco, USA.-13. December 2008., 12
publishDate 2008
record_format openpolar
spelling ftawi:oai:epic.awi.de:19774 2025-06-08T14:07:03+00:00 Ocean bottom pressure variability derived from different GRACE solutions Böning, Carmen Timmermann, Ralph Macrander, Annecke Schröter, Jens 2008 https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/19774/ https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.31688 unknown Böning, C. , Timmermann, R. , Macrander, A. and Schröter, J. orcid:0000-0002-9240-5798 (2008) Ocean bottom pressure variability derived from different GRACE solutions , GRACE Science Team Meeting 2008, San Francisco, USA.-13. December 2008. . hdl:10013/epic.31688 EPIC3GRACE Science Team Meeting 2008, San Francisco, USA.-13. December 2008., 12 Conference notRev 2008 ftawi 2025-05-12T03:46:38Z The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) provides estimates of the earthÕs static and time-variant gravity field. Solutions from various processing centers (GFZ, CSR, JPL etc.) enable us to determine water mass redistributions on the globe. Given that land signals are generally large compared to anomalies over the ocean; an assessment of the latter requires a particularly careful filtering of the data. We utilized the Finite Element Sea-Ice Ocean Model (FESOM) to develop a filtering algorithm which relies on the spatial coherency of ocean bottom pressure (OBP) anomalies. For every position in the ocean, OBP anomalies are coherent over a considerable area. Thus, this pattern can be used to determine time series of GRACE-derived OBP anomalies at any position by weighting the time series in the vicinity with the correlation to the original time series. A global validation with in situ OBP data from a global database which has been compiled at the AWI shows that the correlation between in situ and GRACE data is improved by using the new filter in comparison to Gauss filtering.In this study we use GRACE solutions from JPL, CSR and GFZ where the correlated errors in the spherical harmonic solutions have been removed. These so-called destriped solutions are available processed with a 300 km, 500 km, and 750 km radius Gauss filter. The best correlations to the in-situ data are obtained using the 750-km Gauss filtered data. Correlation to the in-situ data can be even further improved for a combination of destriping and pattern filtering. Conference Object Sea ice Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar- and Marine Research (AWI): ePIC (electronic Publication Information Center)
spellingShingle Böning, Carmen
Timmermann, Ralph
Macrander, Annecke
Schröter, Jens
Ocean bottom pressure variability derived from different GRACE solutions
title Ocean bottom pressure variability derived from different GRACE solutions
title_full Ocean bottom pressure variability derived from different GRACE solutions
title_fullStr Ocean bottom pressure variability derived from different GRACE solutions
title_full_unstemmed Ocean bottom pressure variability derived from different GRACE solutions
title_short Ocean bottom pressure variability derived from different GRACE solutions
title_sort ocean bottom pressure variability derived from different grace solutions
url https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/19774/
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.31688