Work, Learning, Inequality and the Academy

Paper led to a good discussion on the question of “what are universities for?” plus the issues of funding and alternative structures This paper will look at the connections between work, learning and inequality and apply these understandings to the academy as a worksite. (Theorizing from the literat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Spencer, Bruce
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
HRM
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2149/3236
id ftathabasuniv:oai:auspace.athabascau.ca:2149/3236
record_format openpolar
spelling ftathabasuniv:oai:auspace.athabascau.ca:2149/3236 2023-11-05T03:43:00+01:00 Work, Learning, Inequality and the Academy Spencer, Bruce 2012-11-15T21:36:42Z application/msword http://hdl.handle.net/2149/3236 en eng 92.927.G1356; http://hdl.handle.net/2149/3236 HRM Occupy Wall Street Presentation 2012 ftathabasuniv 2023-10-08T07:35:30Z Paper led to a good discussion on the question of “what are universities for?” plus the issues of funding and alternative structures This paper will look at the connections between work, learning and inequality and apply these understandings to the academy as a worksite. (Theorizing from the literature) Introduction The connection between “work and learning” and human resource management (HRM) as a management control mechanism have been discussed previously. In this paper we want to link these arguments more closely to issues of inequality, (linking to the debates about the “Dominance of the 1%” and “Occupy Wall Street”) and finally to the structural and cultural practices of the Academy as a work-site that mirrors mainstream society. Both authors have written previously, and separately, about the key issues referred to above but have not brought the analysis together to focus on inequality and how that plays out in work and learning literature and the academy as a worksite. The Purpose of this Exploration/Argument Any argument about “work and learning” in the present context should take account of, or at least acknowledge, the major changes that have resulted from the rise in the global importance of financial capital and the resulting crisis of 2008 (Nolan, 2011) and its after-shocks in European countries such as Iceland, Greece, Ireland and Italy. It can be argued that “workplace learning” as essentially an offshoot of Human Resource Management (HRM) is therefore a party to the current economic crisis. Management education in general may be more to blame for the unquestioning acceptance of hegemonic neo-liberal economic ideas but mainstream work and learning practice, teaching and scholarship has also been complicit. It has been argued that “it is an inconvenient truth that many of those implicated in the disasters that have beset Wall Street and the world’s other financial centres are MBA graduates” (Currie, Knights and Starkey, 2010, p.1-2) and we would add ditto for scholars of work and learning and ... Conference Object Iceland Athabasca University: AUSpace
institution Open Polar
collection Athabasca University: AUSpace
op_collection_id ftathabasuniv
language English
topic HRM
Occupy Wall Street
spellingShingle HRM
Occupy Wall Street
Spencer, Bruce
Work, Learning, Inequality and the Academy
topic_facet HRM
Occupy Wall Street
description Paper led to a good discussion on the question of “what are universities for?” plus the issues of funding and alternative structures This paper will look at the connections between work, learning and inequality and apply these understandings to the academy as a worksite. (Theorizing from the literature) Introduction The connection between “work and learning” and human resource management (HRM) as a management control mechanism have been discussed previously. In this paper we want to link these arguments more closely to issues of inequality, (linking to the debates about the “Dominance of the 1%” and “Occupy Wall Street”) and finally to the structural and cultural practices of the Academy as a work-site that mirrors mainstream society. Both authors have written previously, and separately, about the key issues referred to above but have not brought the analysis together to focus on inequality and how that plays out in work and learning literature and the academy as a worksite. The Purpose of this Exploration/Argument Any argument about “work and learning” in the present context should take account of, or at least acknowledge, the major changes that have resulted from the rise in the global importance of financial capital and the resulting crisis of 2008 (Nolan, 2011) and its after-shocks in European countries such as Iceland, Greece, Ireland and Italy. It can be argued that “workplace learning” as essentially an offshoot of Human Resource Management (HRM) is therefore a party to the current economic crisis. Management education in general may be more to blame for the unquestioning acceptance of hegemonic neo-liberal economic ideas but mainstream work and learning practice, teaching and scholarship has also been complicit. It has been argued that “it is an inconvenient truth that many of those implicated in the disasters that have beset Wall Street and the world’s other financial centres are MBA graduates” (Currie, Knights and Starkey, 2010, p.1-2) and we would add ditto for scholars of work and learning and ...
format Conference Object
author Spencer, Bruce
author_facet Spencer, Bruce
author_sort Spencer, Bruce
title Work, Learning, Inequality and the Academy
title_short Work, Learning, Inequality and the Academy
title_full Work, Learning, Inequality and the Academy
title_fullStr Work, Learning, Inequality and the Academy
title_full_unstemmed Work, Learning, Inequality and the Academy
title_sort work, learning, inequality and the academy
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/2149/3236
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation 92.927.G1356;
http://hdl.handle.net/2149/3236
_version_ 1781700710549684224