On astrophysical solution to ultra high energy cosmic rays

We argue that an astrophysical solution to UHECR problem is viable. The pectral features of extragalactic protons interacting with CMB are calculated in model-independent way. Using the power-law generation spectrum $\propto E^{-\gamma_g}$ as the only assumption, we analyze four features of the prot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical Review D
Main Authors: Berezinsky, V., Gazizov, A. Z., Grigorieva, S. I.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0204357
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.043005
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0204357
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0204357 2023-09-05T13:23:59+02:00 On astrophysical solution to ultra high energy cosmic rays Berezinsky, V. Gazizov, A. Z. Grigorieva, S. I. 2002-04-30 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0204357 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.043005 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0204357 Phys.Rev.D74:043005,2006 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.043005 High Energy Physics - Phenomenology Astrophysics text 2002 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.043005 2023-08-16T18:36:36Z We argue that an astrophysical solution to UHECR problem is viable. The pectral features of extragalactic protons interacting with CMB are calculated in model-independent way. Using the power-law generation spectrum $\propto E^{-\gamma_g}$ as the only assumption, we analyze four features of the proton spectrum: the GZK cutoff, dip, bump and the second dip. We found the dip, induced by electron-positron production on CMB, as the most robust feature, existing in energy range $1\times 10^{18} - 4\times 10^{19}$ eV. Its shape is stable relative to various phenomena included in calculations. The dip is well confirmed by observations of AGASA, HiRes, Fly's Eye and Yakutsk detectors. The best fit is reached at $\gamma_g =2.7$, with the allowed range 2.55 - 2.75. The dip is used for energy calibration of the detectors. After the energy calibration the fluxes and spectra of all three detectors agree perfectly, with discrepancy between AGASA and HiRes at $E> 1\times 10^{20}$ eV being not statistically significant. The agreement of the dip with observations should be considered as confirmation of UHE proton interaction with CMB. The dip has two flattenings. The high energy flattening at $E \approx 1\times 10^{19}$ eV automatically explains ankle. The low-energy flattening at $E \approx 1\times 10^{18}$ eV provides the transition to galactic cosmic rays. This transition is studied quantitatively. The UHECR sources, AGN and GRBs, are studied in a model-dependent way, and acceleration is discussed. Based on the agreement of the dip with existing data, we make the robust prediction for the spectrum at $1\times 10^{18} - 1\times 10^{20}$ eV to be measured in the nearest future by Auger detector. Comment: Revised version as published in Phys.Rev. D47 (2006) 043005 with a small addition Text Yakutsk ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Yakutsk Physical Review D 74 4
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Astrophysics
spellingShingle High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Astrophysics
Berezinsky, V.
Gazizov, A. Z.
Grigorieva, S. I.
On astrophysical solution to ultra high energy cosmic rays
topic_facet High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Astrophysics
description We argue that an astrophysical solution to UHECR problem is viable. The pectral features of extragalactic protons interacting with CMB are calculated in model-independent way. Using the power-law generation spectrum $\propto E^{-\gamma_g}$ as the only assumption, we analyze four features of the proton spectrum: the GZK cutoff, dip, bump and the second dip. We found the dip, induced by electron-positron production on CMB, as the most robust feature, existing in energy range $1\times 10^{18} - 4\times 10^{19}$ eV. Its shape is stable relative to various phenomena included in calculations. The dip is well confirmed by observations of AGASA, HiRes, Fly's Eye and Yakutsk detectors. The best fit is reached at $\gamma_g =2.7$, with the allowed range 2.55 - 2.75. The dip is used for energy calibration of the detectors. After the energy calibration the fluxes and spectra of all three detectors agree perfectly, with discrepancy between AGASA and HiRes at $E> 1\times 10^{20}$ eV being not statistically significant. The agreement of the dip with observations should be considered as confirmation of UHE proton interaction with CMB. The dip has two flattenings. The high energy flattening at $E \approx 1\times 10^{19}$ eV automatically explains ankle. The low-energy flattening at $E \approx 1\times 10^{18}$ eV provides the transition to galactic cosmic rays. This transition is studied quantitatively. The UHECR sources, AGN and GRBs, are studied in a model-dependent way, and acceleration is discussed. Based on the agreement of the dip with existing data, we make the robust prediction for the spectrum at $1\times 10^{18} - 1\times 10^{20}$ eV to be measured in the nearest future by Auger detector. Comment: Revised version as published in Phys.Rev. D47 (2006) 043005 with a small addition
format Text
author Berezinsky, V.
Gazizov, A. Z.
Grigorieva, S. I.
author_facet Berezinsky, V.
Gazizov, A. Z.
Grigorieva, S. I.
author_sort Berezinsky, V.
title On astrophysical solution to ultra high energy cosmic rays
title_short On astrophysical solution to ultra high energy cosmic rays
title_full On astrophysical solution to ultra high energy cosmic rays
title_fullStr On astrophysical solution to ultra high energy cosmic rays
title_full_unstemmed On astrophysical solution to ultra high energy cosmic rays
title_sort on astrophysical solution to ultra high energy cosmic rays
publishDate 2002
url http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0204357
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.043005
geographic Yakutsk
geographic_facet Yakutsk
genre Yakutsk
genre_facet Yakutsk
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0204357
Phys.Rev.D74:043005,2006
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.043005
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.043005
container_title Physical Review D
container_volume 74
container_issue 4
_version_ 1776204569106186240