Are seismic waiting time distributions universal?

We show that seismic waiting time distributions in California and Iceland have many features in common as, for example, a power-law decay with exponent $\alpha \approx 1.1$ for intermediate and with exponent $\gamma \approx 0.6$ for short waiting times. While the transition point between these two r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Davidsen, Jörn, Goltz, Christian
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410444
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020892
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:cond-mat/0410444
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:cond-mat/0410444 2023-09-05T13:20:30+02:00 Are seismic waiting time distributions universal? Davidsen, Jörn Goltz, Christian 2004-10-18 http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410444 https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020892 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410444 Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L21612 (2004). doi:10.1029/2004GL020892 Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics Physics - Geophysics text 2004 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020892 2023-08-16T18:16:48Z We show that seismic waiting time distributions in California and Iceland have many features in common as, for example, a power-law decay with exponent $\alpha \approx 1.1$ for intermediate and with exponent $\gamma \approx 0.6$ for short waiting times. While the transition point between these two regimes scales proportionally with the size of the considered area, the full distribution is not universal and depends in a non-trivial way on the geological area under consideration and its size. This is due to the spatial distribution of epicenters which does \emph{not} form a simple mono-fractal. Yet, the dependence of the waiting time distributions on the threshold magnitude seems to be universal. Comment: 5 pages, 4 figures, accepted for publication in Geophys. Res. Lett Text Iceland ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Geophysical Research Letters 31 21 n/a n/a
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics
Physics - Geophysics
spellingShingle Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics
Physics - Geophysics
Davidsen, Jörn
Goltz, Christian
Are seismic waiting time distributions universal?
topic_facet Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics
Physics - Geophysics
description We show that seismic waiting time distributions in California and Iceland have many features in common as, for example, a power-law decay with exponent $\alpha \approx 1.1$ for intermediate and with exponent $\gamma \approx 0.6$ for short waiting times. While the transition point between these two regimes scales proportionally with the size of the considered area, the full distribution is not universal and depends in a non-trivial way on the geological area under consideration and its size. This is due to the spatial distribution of epicenters which does \emph{not} form a simple mono-fractal. Yet, the dependence of the waiting time distributions on the threshold magnitude seems to be universal. Comment: 5 pages, 4 figures, accepted for publication in Geophys. Res. Lett
format Text
author Davidsen, Jörn
Goltz, Christian
author_facet Davidsen, Jörn
Goltz, Christian
author_sort Davidsen, Jörn
title Are seismic waiting time distributions universal?
title_short Are seismic waiting time distributions universal?
title_full Are seismic waiting time distributions universal?
title_fullStr Are seismic waiting time distributions universal?
title_full_unstemmed Are seismic waiting time distributions universal?
title_sort are seismic waiting time distributions universal?
publishDate 2004
url http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410444
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020892
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410444
Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L21612 (2004).
doi:10.1029/2004GL020892
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020892
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 31
container_issue 21
container_start_page n/a
op_container_end_page n/a
_version_ 1776201185476214784