Are seismic waiting time distributions universal?
We show that seismic waiting time distributions in California and Iceland have many features in common as, for example, a power-law decay with exponent $\alpha \approx 1.1$ for intermediate and with exponent $\gamma \approx 0.6$ for short waiting times. While the transition point between these two r...
Published in: | Geophysical Research Letters |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2004
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410444 https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020892 |
id |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:cond-mat/0410444 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:cond-mat/0410444 2023-09-05T13:20:30+02:00 Are seismic waiting time distributions universal? Davidsen, Jörn Goltz, Christian 2004-10-18 http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410444 https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020892 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410444 Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L21612 (2004). doi:10.1029/2004GL020892 Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics Physics - Geophysics text 2004 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020892 2023-08-16T18:16:48Z We show that seismic waiting time distributions in California and Iceland have many features in common as, for example, a power-law decay with exponent $\alpha \approx 1.1$ for intermediate and with exponent $\gamma \approx 0.6$ for short waiting times. While the transition point between these two regimes scales proportionally with the size of the considered area, the full distribution is not universal and depends in a non-trivial way on the geological area under consideration and its size. This is due to the spatial distribution of epicenters which does \emph{not} form a simple mono-fractal. Yet, the dependence of the waiting time distributions on the threshold magnitude seems to be universal. Comment: 5 pages, 4 figures, accepted for publication in Geophys. Res. Lett Text Iceland ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Geophysical Research Letters 31 21 n/a n/a |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) |
op_collection_id |
ftarxivpreprints |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics Physics - Geophysics |
spellingShingle |
Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics Physics - Geophysics Davidsen, Jörn Goltz, Christian Are seismic waiting time distributions universal? |
topic_facet |
Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics Physics - Geophysics |
description |
We show that seismic waiting time distributions in California and Iceland have many features in common as, for example, a power-law decay with exponent $\alpha \approx 1.1$ for intermediate and with exponent $\gamma \approx 0.6$ for short waiting times. While the transition point between these two regimes scales proportionally with the size of the considered area, the full distribution is not universal and depends in a non-trivial way on the geological area under consideration and its size. This is due to the spatial distribution of epicenters which does \emph{not} form a simple mono-fractal. Yet, the dependence of the waiting time distributions on the threshold magnitude seems to be universal. Comment: 5 pages, 4 figures, accepted for publication in Geophys. Res. Lett |
format |
Text |
author |
Davidsen, Jörn Goltz, Christian |
author_facet |
Davidsen, Jörn Goltz, Christian |
author_sort |
Davidsen, Jörn |
title |
Are seismic waiting time distributions universal? |
title_short |
Are seismic waiting time distributions universal? |
title_full |
Are seismic waiting time distributions universal? |
title_fullStr |
Are seismic waiting time distributions universal? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are seismic waiting time distributions universal? |
title_sort |
are seismic waiting time distributions universal? |
publishDate |
2004 |
url |
http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410444 https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020892 |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_relation |
http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410444 Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L21612 (2004). doi:10.1029/2004GL020892 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020892 |
container_title |
Geophysical Research Letters |
container_volume |
31 |
container_issue |
21 |
container_start_page |
n/a |
op_container_end_page |
n/a |
_version_ |
1776201185476214784 |