MAX 4 and MAX 5 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-Lambda CDM cosmogonies

We account for experimental and observational uncertainties in likelihood analyses of cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy data from the MAX 4 and MAX 5 experiments. These analyses use CMB anisotropy spectra predicted in open and spatially-flat Lambda cold dark matter cosmogonies. Amongst th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Main Authors: Ganga, Ken, Ratra, Bharat, Lim, Mark A., Sugiyama, Naoshi, Tanaka, Stacy T.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9708202
https://doi.org/10.1086/313072
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9708202
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9708202 2023-09-05T13:23:19+02:00 MAX 4 and MAX 5 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-Lambda CDM cosmogonies Ganga, Ken Ratra, Bharat Lim, Mark A. Sugiyama, Naoshi Tanaka, Stacy T. 1997-08-21 http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9708202 https://doi.org/10.1086/313072 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9708202 Astrophys.J.Suppl.114:165-175,1998 doi:10.1086/313072 Astrophysics text 1997 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1086/313072 2023-08-16T18:05:53Z We account for experimental and observational uncertainties in likelihood analyses of cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy data from the MAX 4 and MAX 5 experiments. These analyses use CMB anisotropy spectra predicted in open and spatially-flat Lambda cold dark matter cosmogonies. Amongst the models considered, the combined MAX data set is most consistent with the CMB anisotropy shape in Omega_0 ~ 0.1-0.2 open models and less so with that in old (t_0 >~ 15 - 16 Gyr, i.e., low h), high baryon density (Omega_B >~ 0.0175/h^2), low density (Omega_0 ~ 0.2 - 0.4), flat-Lambda models. The MAX data alone do not rule out any of the models we consider at the 2-sigma level. Model normalizations deduced from the combined MAX data are consistent with those drawn from the UCSB South Pole 1994 data, except for the flat bandpower model where MAX favours a higher normalization. The combined MAX data normalization for open models with Omega_0 ~ 0.1-0.2 is higher than the upper 2-sigma value of the DMR normalization. The combined MAX data normalization for old (low h), high baryon density, low-density flat-Lambda models is below the lower 2-sigma value of the DMR normalization. Open models with Omega_0 ~ 0.4-0.5 are not far from the shape most favoured by the MAX data, and for these models the MAX and DMR normalizations overlap. The MAX and DMR normalizations also overlap for Omega_0 = 1 and some higher h, lower Omega_B, low-density flat-Lambda models. Comment: Latex, 37 pages, uses aasms4 style Text South pole ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Lambda ENVELOPE(-62.983,-62.983,-64.300,-64.300) South Pole The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 114 2 165 175
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Astrophysics
spellingShingle Astrophysics
Ganga, Ken
Ratra, Bharat
Lim, Mark A.
Sugiyama, Naoshi
Tanaka, Stacy T.
MAX 4 and MAX 5 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-Lambda CDM cosmogonies
topic_facet Astrophysics
description We account for experimental and observational uncertainties in likelihood analyses of cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy data from the MAX 4 and MAX 5 experiments. These analyses use CMB anisotropy spectra predicted in open and spatially-flat Lambda cold dark matter cosmogonies. Amongst the models considered, the combined MAX data set is most consistent with the CMB anisotropy shape in Omega_0 ~ 0.1-0.2 open models and less so with that in old (t_0 >~ 15 - 16 Gyr, i.e., low h), high baryon density (Omega_B >~ 0.0175/h^2), low density (Omega_0 ~ 0.2 - 0.4), flat-Lambda models. The MAX data alone do not rule out any of the models we consider at the 2-sigma level. Model normalizations deduced from the combined MAX data are consistent with those drawn from the UCSB South Pole 1994 data, except for the flat bandpower model where MAX favours a higher normalization. The combined MAX data normalization for open models with Omega_0 ~ 0.1-0.2 is higher than the upper 2-sigma value of the DMR normalization. The combined MAX data normalization for old (low h), high baryon density, low-density flat-Lambda models is below the lower 2-sigma value of the DMR normalization. Open models with Omega_0 ~ 0.4-0.5 are not far from the shape most favoured by the MAX data, and for these models the MAX and DMR normalizations overlap. The MAX and DMR normalizations also overlap for Omega_0 = 1 and some higher h, lower Omega_B, low-density flat-Lambda models. Comment: Latex, 37 pages, uses aasms4 style
format Text
author Ganga, Ken
Ratra, Bharat
Lim, Mark A.
Sugiyama, Naoshi
Tanaka, Stacy T.
author_facet Ganga, Ken
Ratra, Bharat
Lim, Mark A.
Sugiyama, Naoshi
Tanaka, Stacy T.
author_sort Ganga, Ken
title MAX 4 and MAX 5 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-Lambda CDM cosmogonies
title_short MAX 4 and MAX 5 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-Lambda CDM cosmogonies
title_full MAX 4 and MAX 5 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-Lambda CDM cosmogonies
title_fullStr MAX 4 and MAX 5 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-Lambda CDM cosmogonies
title_full_unstemmed MAX 4 and MAX 5 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-Lambda CDM cosmogonies
title_sort max 4 and max 5 cmb anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-lambda cdm cosmogonies
publishDate 1997
url http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9708202
https://doi.org/10.1086/313072
long_lat ENVELOPE(-62.983,-62.983,-64.300,-64.300)
geographic Lambda
South Pole
geographic_facet Lambda
South Pole
genre South pole
genre_facet South pole
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9708202
Astrophys.J.Suppl.114:165-175,1998
doi:10.1086/313072
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1086/313072
container_title The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
container_volume 114
container_issue 2
container_start_page 165
op_container_end_page 175
_version_ 1776203893173125120