Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys
Galaxy cluster surveys will be a powerful probe of dark energy. At the same time, cluster abundance is sensitive to any non-Gaussianity of the primordial density field. It is therefore possible that non-Gaussian initial conditions might be misinterpreted as a sign of dark energy or at least degrade...
Published in: | The Astrophysical Journal |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609124 https://doi.org/10.1086/511331 |
id |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609124 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609124 2023-09-05T13:23:18+02:00 Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys Sefusatti, Emiliano Vale, Chris Kadota, Kenji Frieman, Joshua 2006-09-05 http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609124 https://doi.org/10.1086/511331 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609124 Astrophys.J.658:669-679,2007 doi:10.1086/511331 Astrophysics text 2006 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1086/511331 2023-08-16T18:03:23Z Galaxy cluster surveys will be a powerful probe of dark energy. At the same time, cluster abundance is sensitive to any non-Gaussianity of the primordial density field. It is therefore possible that non-Gaussian initial conditions might be misinterpreted as a sign of dark energy or at least degrade the expected constraints on dark energy parameters. To address this issue, we perform a likelihood analysis of an ideal cluster survey similar in size and depth to the upcoming South Pole Telescope/Dark Energy Survey (SPT-DES). We analyze a model in which the strength of the non-Gaussianity is parameterized by the constant fNL; this model has been used extensively to derive Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropy constraints on non-Gaussianity, allowing us to make contact with those works. We find that the constraining power of the cluster survey on dark energy observables is not significantly diminished by non-Gaussianity provided that cluster redshift information is included in the analysis. We also find that even an ideal cluster survey is unlikely to improve significantly current and future CMB constraints on non-Gaussianity. However, when all systematics are under control, it could constitute a valuable cross check to CMB observations. Comment: 10 pages, 4 figures. Corrected a minor discrepancy between our earlier definition of fNL and CMB constraints. References added Text South pole ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) South Pole The Astrophysical Journal 658 2 669 679 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) |
op_collection_id |
ftarxivpreprints |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Astrophysics |
spellingShingle |
Astrophysics Sefusatti, Emiliano Vale, Chris Kadota, Kenji Frieman, Joshua Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys |
topic_facet |
Astrophysics |
description |
Galaxy cluster surveys will be a powerful probe of dark energy. At the same time, cluster abundance is sensitive to any non-Gaussianity of the primordial density field. It is therefore possible that non-Gaussian initial conditions might be misinterpreted as a sign of dark energy or at least degrade the expected constraints on dark energy parameters. To address this issue, we perform a likelihood analysis of an ideal cluster survey similar in size and depth to the upcoming South Pole Telescope/Dark Energy Survey (SPT-DES). We analyze a model in which the strength of the non-Gaussianity is parameterized by the constant fNL; this model has been used extensively to derive Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropy constraints on non-Gaussianity, allowing us to make contact with those works. We find that the constraining power of the cluster survey on dark energy observables is not significantly diminished by non-Gaussianity provided that cluster redshift information is included in the analysis. We also find that even an ideal cluster survey is unlikely to improve significantly current and future CMB constraints on non-Gaussianity. However, when all systematics are under control, it could constitute a valuable cross check to CMB observations. Comment: 10 pages, 4 figures. Corrected a minor discrepancy between our earlier definition of fNL and CMB constraints. References added |
format |
Text |
author |
Sefusatti, Emiliano Vale, Chris Kadota, Kenji Frieman, Joshua |
author_facet |
Sefusatti, Emiliano Vale, Chris Kadota, Kenji Frieman, Joshua |
author_sort |
Sefusatti, Emiliano |
title |
Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys |
title_short |
Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys |
title_full |
Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys |
title_fullStr |
Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys |
title_full_unstemmed |
Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys |
title_sort |
primordial non-gaussianity and dark energy constraints from cluster surveys |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609124 https://doi.org/10.1086/511331 |
geographic |
South Pole |
geographic_facet |
South Pole |
genre |
South pole |
genre_facet |
South pole |
op_relation |
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609124 Astrophys.J.658:669-679,2007 doi:10.1086/511331 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1086/511331 |
container_title |
The Astrophysical Journal |
container_volume |
658 |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
669 |
op_container_end_page |
679 |
_version_ |
1776203866864353280 |