Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys

Galaxy cluster surveys will be a powerful probe of dark energy. At the same time, cluster abundance is sensitive to any non-Gaussianity of the primordial density field. It is therefore possible that non-Gaussian initial conditions might be misinterpreted as a sign of dark energy or at least degrade...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Astrophysical Journal
Main Authors: Sefusatti, Emiliano, Vale, Chris, Kadota, Kenji, Frieman, Joshua
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609124
https://doi.org/10.1086/511331
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609124
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609124 2023-09-05T13:23:18+02:00 Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys Sefusatti, Emiliano Vale, Chris Kadota, Kenji Frieman, Joshua 2006-09-05 http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609124 https://doi.org/10.1086/511331 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609124 Astrophys.J.658:669-679,2007 doi:10.1086/511331 Astrophysics text 2006 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1086/511331 2023-08-16T18:03:23Z Galaxy cluster surveys will be a powerful probe of dark energy. At the same time, cluster abundance is sensitive to any non-Gaussianity of the primordial density field. It is therefore possible that non-Gaussian initial conditions might be misinterpreted as a sign of dark energy or at least degrade the expected constraints on dark energy parameters. To address this issue, we perform a likelihood analysis of an ideal cluster survey similar in size and depth to the upcoming South Pole Telescope/Dark Energy Survey (SPT-DES). We analyze a model in which the strength of the non-Gaussianity is parameterized by the constant fNL; this model has been used extensively to derive Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropy constraints on non-Gaussianity, allowing us to make contact with those works. We find that the constraining power of the cluster survey on dark energy observables is not significantly diminished by non-Gaussianity provided that cluster redshift information is included in the analysis. We also find that even an ideal cluster survey is unlikely to improve significantly current and future CMB constraints on non-Gaussianity. However, when all systematics are under control, it could constitute a valuable cross check to CMB observations. Comment: 10 pages, 4 figures. Corrected a minor discrepancy between our earlier definition of fNL and CMB constraints. References added Text South pole ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) South Pole The Astrophysical Journal 658 2 669 679
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Astrophysics
spellingShingle Astrophysics
Sefusatti, Emiliano
Vale, Chris
Kadota, Kenji
Frieman, Joshua
Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys
topic_facet Astrophysics
description Galaxy cluster surveys will be a powerful probe of dark energy. At the same time, cluster abundance is sensitive to any non-Gaussianity of the primordial density field. It is therefore possible that non-Gaussian initial conditions might be misinterpreted as a sign of dark energy or at least degrade the expected constraints on dark energy parameters. To address this issue, we perform a likelihood analysis of an ideal cluster survey similar in size and depth to the upcoming South Pole Telescope/Dark Energy Survey (SPT-DES). We analyze a model in which the strength of the non-Gaussianity is parameterized by the constant fNL; this model has been used extensively to derive Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropy constraints on non-Gaussianity, allowing us to make contact with those works. We find that the constraining power of the cluster survey on dark energy observables is not significantly diminished by non-Gaussianity provided that cluster redshift information is included in the analysis. We also find that even an ideal cluster survey is unlikely to improve significantly current and future CMB constraints on non-Gaussianity. However, when all systematics are under control, it could constitute a valuable cross check to CMB observations. Comment: 10 pages, 4 figures. Corrected a minor discrepancy between our earlier definition of fNL and CMB constraints. References added
format Text
author Sefusatti, Emiliano
Vale, Chris
Kadota, Kenji
Frieman, Joshua
author_facet Sefusatti, Emiliano
Vale, Chris
Kadota, Kenji
Frieman, Joshua
author_sort Sefusatti, Emiliano
title Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys
title_short Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys
title_full Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys
title_fullStr Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys
title_full_unstemmed Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys
title_sort primordial non-gaussianity and dark energy constraints from cluster surveys
publishDate 2006
url http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609124
https://doi.org/10.1086/511331
geographic South Pole
geographic_facet South Pole
genre South pole
genre_facet South pole
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609124
Astrophys.J.658:669-679,2007
doi:10.1086/511331
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1086/511331
container_title The Astrophysical Journal
container_volume 658
container_issue 2
container_start_page 669
op_container_end_page 679
_version_ 1776203866864353280