Earth matter effects in supernova neutrinos: Optimal detector locations

A model-independent experimental signature for flavor oscillations in the neutrino signal from the next Galactic supernova (SN) would be the observation of Earth matter effects. We calculate the probability for observing a Galactic SN shadowed by the Earth as a function of the detector's geogra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Main Authors: Mirizzi, A., Raffelt, G. G., Serpico, P. D.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0604300
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2006/05/012
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0604300
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0604300 2023-09-05T13:23:14+02:00 Earth matter effects in supernova neutrinos: Optimal detector locations Mirizzi, A. Raffelt, G. G. Serpico, P. D. 2006-04-13 http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0604300 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2006/05/012 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0604300 JCAP 0605 (2006) 012 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/05/012 Astrophysics High Energy Physics - Experiment High Energy Physics - Phenomenology text 2006 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2006/05/012 2023-08-16T18:02:39Z A model-independent experimental signature for flavor oscillations in the neutrino signal from the next Galactic supernova (SN) would be the observation of Earth matter effects. We calculate the probability for observing a Galactic SN shadowed by the Earth as a function of the detector's geographic latitude. This probability depends only mildly on details of the Galactic SN distribution. A location at the North Pole would be optimal with a shadowing probability of about 60%, but a far-northern location such as Pyhasalmi in Finland, the proposed site for a large-volume scintillator detector, is almost equivalent (58%). We also consider several pairs of detector locations and calculate the probability that only one of them is shadowed, allowing a comparison between a shadowed and a direct signal. For the South Pole combined with Kamioka this probability is almost 75%, for the South Pole combined with Pyhasalmi it is almost 90%. One particular scenario consists of a large-volume scintillator detector located in Pyhasalmi to measure the geo-neutrino flux in a continental location and another such detector in Hawaii to measure it in an oceanic location. The probability that only one of them is shadowed exceeds 50% whereas the probability that at least one is shadowed is about 80%. We provide an online tool to calculate different shadowing probabilities for the one- and two-detector cases. Comment: v2: 17 pages, 6 eps figures. Typos removed, matches the published version. Online tool to calculate the Earth shadowing probabilities available at http://www.mppmu.mpg.de/supernova/shadowing . High-resolution color version of fig_2a and fig_2b available at http://www.mppmu.mpg.de/supernova/shadowing/map Text South pole ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) North Pole South Pole Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2006 05 012 012
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Astrophysics
High Energy Physics - Experiment
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
spellingShingle Astrophysics
High Energy Physics - Experiment
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Mirizzi, A.
Raffelt, G. G.
Serpico, P. D.
Earth matter effects in supernova neutrinos: Optimal detector locations
topic_facet Astrophysics
High Energy Physics - Experiment
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
description A model-independent experimental signature for flavor oscillations in the neutrino signal from the next Galactic supernova (SN) would be the observation of Earth matter effects. We calculate the probability for observing a Galactic SN shadowed by the Earth as a function of the detector's geographic latitude. This probability depends only mildly on details of the Galactic SN distribution. A location at the North Pole would be optimal with a shadowing probability of about 60%, but a far-northern location such as Pyhasalmi in Finland, the proposed site for a large-volume scintillator detector, is almost equivalent (58%). We also consider several pairs of detector locations and calculate the probability that only one of them is shadowed, allowing a comparison between a shadowed and a direct signal. For the South Pole combined with Kamioka this probability is almost 75%, for the South Pole combined with Pyhasalmi it is almost 90%. One particular scenario consists of a large-volume scintillator detector located in Pyhasalmi to measure the geo-neutrino flux in a continental location and another such detector in Hawaii to measure it in an oceanic location. The probability that only one of them is shadowed exceeds 50% whereas the probability that at least one is shadowed is about 80%. We provide an online tool to calculate different shadowing probabilities for the one- and two-detector cases. Comment: v2: 17 pages, 6 eps figures. Typos removed, matches the published version. Online tool to calculate the Earth shadowing probabilities available at http://www.mppmu.mpg.de/supernova/shadowing . High-resolution color version of fig_2a and fig_2b available at http://www.mppmu.mpg.de/supernova/shadowing/map
format Text
author Mirizzi, A.
Raffelt, G. G.
Serpico, P. D.
author_facet Mirizzi, A.
Raffelt, G. G.
Serpico, P. D.
author_sort Mirizzi, A.
title Earth matter effects in supernova neutrinos: Optimal detector locations
title_short Earth matter effects in supernova neutrinos: Optimal detector locations
title_full Earth matter effects in supernova neutrinos: Optimal detector locations
title_fullStr Earth matter effects in supernova neutrinos: Optimal detector locations
title_full_unstemmed Earth matter effects in supernova neutrinos: Optimal detector locations
title_sort earth matter effects in supernova neutrinos: optimal detector locations
publishDate 2006
url http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0604300
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2006/05/012
geographic North Pole
South Pole
geographic_facet North Pole
South Pole
genre South pole
genre_facet South pole
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0604300
JCAP 0605 (2006) 012
doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/05/012
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2006/05/012
container_title Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
container_volume 2006
container_issue 05
container_start_page 012
op_container_end_page 012
_version_ 1776203794296602624