Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA

In the effort to obtain low cost routine space debris observations in low Earth orbit, ESA plans to utilise the radar facilities of the European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association. First demonstration measurements were performed from 11 to 23 February 2001. In total $16{\rm hours}$ of radar s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in Space Research
Main Authors: Landgraf, M., Jehn, R., Flury, W.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0301200
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.007
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0301200
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0301200 2023-09-05T13:19:11+02:00 Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA Landgraf, M. Jehn, R. Flury, W. 2003-01-13 http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0301200 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.007 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0301200 doi:10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.007 Astrophysics text 2003 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.007 2023-08-16T17:57:21Z In the effort to obtain low cost routine space debris observations in low Earth orbit, ESA plans to utilise the radar facilities of the European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association. First demonstration measurements were performed from 11 to 23 February 2001. In total $16{\rm hours}$ of radar signals were collected. Here we compare these initial measurements with the predictions of the ESA MASTER/PROOF'99 model in order to assess the sensitivity as well as the reliability of the data. We find that while the determination of object size needs to be reviewed, the altitude distribution provides a good fit to the model prediction. The absolute number of objects detected in the various altitude bins indicates that the coherent integration method indeed increases the detection sensitivity when compared to incoherent integration. In the data presented here integration times from 0.1 to $0.3{\rm s}$ were used. As expected, orbit information cannot be obtained from the measurements if they are linked to ionospheric measurements as planned. In addition routine space debris observations provide also useful information for the validation of large-object catalogues. Comment: 6 pages, 6 figures, uses LaTeX2e and cospar.sty, to appear in Advances in Space Research, available on http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/galileo/~landgraf Text EISCAT ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Advances in Space Research 34 5 872 877
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Astrophysics
spellingShingle Astrophysics
Landgraf, M.
Jehn, R.
Flury, W.
Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA
topic_facet Astrophysics
description In the effort to obtain low cost routine space debris observations in low Earth orbit, ESA plans to utilise the radar facilities of the European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association. First demonstration measurements were performed from 11 to 23 February 2001. In total $16{\rm hours}$ of radar signals were collected. Here we compare these initial measurements with the predictions of the ESA MASTER/PROOF'99 model in order to assess the sensitivity as well as the reliability of the data. We find that while the determination of object size needs to be reviewed, the altitude distribution provides a good fit to the model prediction. The absolute number of objects detected in the various altitude bins indicates that the coherent integration method indeed increases the detection sensitivity when compared to incoherent integration. In the data presented here integration times from 0.1 to $0.3{\rm s}$ were used. As expected, orbit information cannot be obtained from the measurements if they are linked to ionospheric measurements as planned. In addition routine space debris observations provide also useful information for the validation of large-object catalogues. Comment: 6 pages, 6 figures, uses LaTeX2e and cospar.sty, to appear in Advances in Space Research, available on http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/galileo/~landgraf
format Text
author Landgraf, M.
Jehn, R.
Flury, W.
author_facet Landgraf, M.
Jehn, R.
Flury, W.
author_sort Landgraf, M.
title Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA
title_short Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA
title_full Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA
title_fullStr Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of EISCAT Radar Data on Space Debris with Model Prediction by the MASTER Model of ESA
title_sort comparison of eiscat radar data on space debris with model prediction by the master model of esa
publishDate 2003
url http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0301200
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.007
genre EISCAT
genre_facet EISCAT
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0301200
doi:10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.007
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.01.007
container_title Advances in Space Research
container_volume 34
container_issue 5
container_start_page 872
op_container_end_page 877
_version_ 1776200000170098688