Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field
The real-time interpretation of the logging-while-drilling data allows us to estimate the positions and properties of the geological layers in an anisotropic subsurface environment. Robust real-time estimations capturing uncertainty can be very useful for efficient geosteering operations. However, t...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.15548 |
id |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:2210.15548 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:2210.15548 2023-09-05T13:18:26+02:00 Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field Rammay, Muzammil Hussain Alyaev, Sergey Larsen, David Selvåg Bratvold, Reidar Brumer Saint, Craig 2022-10-27 http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.15548 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.15548 Physics - Geophysics Statistics - Applications Statistics - Computation Statistics - Machine Learning text 2022 ftarxivpreprints 2023-08-16T17:21:35Z The real-time interpretation of the logging-while-drilling data allows us to estimate the positions and properties of the geological layers in an anisotropic subsurface environment. Robust real-time estimations capturing uncertainty can be very useful for efficient geosteering operations. However, the model errors in the prior conceptual geological models and forward simulation of the measurements can be significant factors in the unreliable estimations of the profiles of the geological layers. The model errors are specifically pronounced when using a deep-neural-network (DNN) approximation which we use to accelerate and parallelize the simulation of the measurements. This paper presents a practical workflow consisting of offline and online phases. The offline phase includes DNN training and building of an uncertain prior near-well geo-model. The online phase uses the flexible iterative ensemble smoother (FlexIES) to perform real-time assimilation of extra-deep electromagnetic data accounting for the model errors in the approximate DNN model. We demonstrate the proposed workflow on a case study for a historic well in the Goliat Field (Barents Sea). The median of our probabilistic estimation is on-par with proprietary inversion despite the approximate DNN model and regardless of the number of layers in the chosen prior. By estimating the model errors, FlexIES automatically quantifies the uncertainty in the layers' boundaries and resistivities, which is not standard for proprietary inversion. Text Barents Sea ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Barents Sea |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) |
op_collection_id |
ftarxivpreprints |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Physics - Geophysics Statistics - Applications Statistics - Computation Statistics - Machine Learning |
spellingShingle |
Physics - Geophysics Statistics - Applications Statistics - Computation Statistics - Machine Learning Rammay, Muzammil Hussain Alyaev, Sergey Larsen, David Selvåg Bratvold, Reidar Brumer Saint, Craig Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field |
topic_facet |
Physics - Geophysics Statistics - Applications Statistics - Computation Statistics - Machine Learning |
description |
The real-time interpretation of the logging-while-drilling data allows us to estimate the positions and properties of the geological layers in an anisotropic subsurface environment. Robust real-time estimations capturing uncertainty can be very useful for efficient geosteering operations. However, the model errors in the prior conceptual geological models and forward simulation of the measurements can be significant factors in the unreliable estimations of the profiles of the geological layers. The model errors are specifically pronounced when using a deep-neural-network (DNN) approximation which we use to accelerate and parallelize the simulation of the measurements. This paper presents a practical workflow consisting of offline and online phases. The offline phase includes DNN training and building of an uncertain prior near-well geo-model. The online phase uses the flexible iterative ensemble smoother (FlexIES) to perform real-time assimilation of extra-deep electromagnetic data accounting for the model errors in the approximate DNN model. We demonstrate the proposed workflow on a case study for a historic well in the Goliat Field (Barents Sea). The median of our probabilistic estimation is on-par with proprietary inversion despite the approximate DNN model and regardless of the number of layers in the chosen prior. By estimating the model errors, FlexIES automatically quantifies the uncertainty in the layers' boundaries and resistivities, which is not standard for proprietary inversion. |
format |
Text |
author |
Rammay, Muzammil Hussain Alyaev, Sergey Larsen, David Selvåg Bratvold, Reidar Brumer Saint, Craig |
author_facet |
Rammay, Muzammil Hussain Alyaev, Sergey Larsen, David Selvåg Bratvold, Reidar Brumer Saint, Craig |
author_sort |
Rammay, Muzammil Hussain |
title |
Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field |
title_short |
Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field |
title_full |
Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field |
title_fullStr |
Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field |
title_full_unstemmed |
Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field |
title_sort |
strategic geosteeering workflow with uncertainty quantification and deep learning: a case study on the goliat field |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.15548 |
geographic |
Barents Sea |
geographic_facet |
Barents Sea |
genre |
Barents Sea |
genre_facet |
Barents Sea |
op_relation |
http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.15548 |
_version_ |
1776199387262746624 |