Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field

The real-time interpretation of the logging-while-drilling data allows us to estimate the positions and properties of the geological layers in an anisotropic subsurface environment. Robust real-time estimations capturing uncertainty can be very useful for efficient geosteering operations. However, t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rammay, Muzammil Hussain, Alyaev, Sergey, Larsen, David Selvåg, Bratvold, Reidar Brumer, Saint, Craig
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.15548
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:2210.15548
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:2210.15548 2023-09-05T13:18:26+02:00 Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field Rammay, Muzammil Hussain Alyaev, Sergey Larsen, David Selvåg Bratvold, Reidar Brumer Saint, Craig 2022-10-27 http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.15548 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.15548 Physics - Geophysics Statistics - Applications Statistics - Computation Statistics - Machine Learning text 2022 ftarxivpreprints 2023-08-16T17:21:35Z The real-time interpretation of the logging-while-drilling data allows us to estimate the positions and properties of the geological layers in an anisotropic subsurface environment. Robust real-time estimations capturing uncertainty can be very useful for efficient geosteering operations. However, the model errors in the prior conceptual geological models and forward simulation of the measurements can be significant factors in the unreliable estimations of the profiles of the geological layers. The model errors are specifically pronounced when using a deep-neural-network (DNN) approximation which we use to accelerate and parallelize the simulation of the measurements. This paper presents a practical workflow consisting of offline and online phases. The offline phase includes DNN training and building of an uncertain prior near-well geo-model. The online phase uses the flexible iterative ensemble smoother (FlexIES) to perform real-time assimilation of extra-deep electromagnetic data accounting for the model errors in the approximate DNN model. We demonstrate the proposed workflow on a case study for a historic well in the Goliat Field (Barents Sea). The median of our probabilistic estimation is on-par with proprietary inversion despite the approximate DNN model and regardless of the number of layers in the chosen prior. By estimating the model errors, FlexIES automatically quantifies the uncertainty in the layers' boundaries and resistivities, which is not standard for proprietary inversion. Text Barents Sea ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Barents Sea
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Physics - Geophysics
Statistics - Applications
Statistics - Computation
Statistics - Machine Learning
spellingShingle Physics - Geophysics
Statistics - Applications
Statistics - Computation
Statistics - Machine Learning
Rammay, Muzammil Hussain
Alyaev, Sergey
Larsen, David Selvåg
Bratvold, Reidar Brumer
Saint, Craig
Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field
topic_facet Physics - Geophysics
Statistics - Applications
Statistics - Computation
Statistics - Machine Learning
description The real-time interpretation of the logging-while-drilling data allows us to estimate the positions and properties of the geological layers in an anisotropic subsurface environment. Robust real-time estimations capturing uncertainty can be very useful for efficient geosteering operations. However, the model errors in the prior conceptual geological models and forward simulation of the measurements can be significant factors in the unreliable estimations of the profiles of the geological layers. The model errors are specifically pronounced when using a deep-neural-network (DNN) approximation which we use to accelerate and parallelize the simulation of the measurements. This paper presents a practical workflow consisting of offline and online phases. The offline phase includes DNN training and building of an uncertain prior near-well geo-model. The online phase uses the flexible iterative ensemble smoother (FlexIES) to perform real-time assimilation of extra-deep electromagnetic data accounting for the model errors in the approximate DNN model. We demonstrate the proposed workflow on a case study for a historic well in the Goliat Field (Barents Sea). The median of our probabilistic estimation is on-par with proprietary inversion despite the approximate DNN model and regardless of the number of layers in the chosen prior. By estimating the model errors, FlexIES automatically quantifies the uncertainty in the layers' boundaries and resistivities, which is not standard for proprietary inversion.
format Text
author Rammay, Muzammil Hussain
Alyaev, Sergey
Larsen, David Selvåg
Bratvold, Reidar Brumer
Saint, Craig
author_facet Rammay, Muzammil Hussain
Alyaev, Sergey
Larsen, David Selvåg
Bratvold, Reidar Brumer
Saint, Craig
author_sort Rammay, Muzammil Hussain
title Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field
title_short Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field
title_full Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field
title_fullStr Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field
title_full_unstemmed Strategic Geosteeering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: A Case Study on the Goliat Field
title_sort strategic geosteeering workflow with uncertainty quantification and deep learning: a case study on the goliat field
publishDate 2022
url http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.15548
geographic Barents Sea
geographic_facet Barents Sea
genre Barents Sea
genre_facet Barents Sea
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.15548
_version_ 1776199387262746624