Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments

We present an updated data-analysis comparison of the most recent observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature anisotropies and polarization angular power spectra released by four different experiments: the Planck satellite on one side, and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACTPol) and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical Review D
Main Authors: Di Valentino, Eleonora, Giarè, William, Melchiorri, Alessandro, Silk, Joseph
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12872
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:2209.12872
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:2209.12872 2023-09-05T13:23:18+02:00 Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments Di Valentino, Eleonora Giarè, William Melchiorri, Alessandro Silk, Joseph 2022-09-26 http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12872 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12872 Phys. Rev. D 106, 103506 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506 Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics text 2022 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506 2023-08-16T17:18:04Z We present an updated data-analysis comparison of the most recent observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature anisotropies and polarization angular power spectra released by four different experiments: the Planck satellite on one side, and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACTPol) and the South Pole Telescope (SPT-3G), combined with the WMAP satellite 9-years observation data in order to be "Planck-independent" on the other side. We investigate in a systematic way 8 extended cosmological models that differ from the baseline $\Lambda$CDM case by the inclusion of many different combinations of additional degrees of freedom, with the aim of finding a viable minimal extended model that can bring all the CMB experiments in agreement. Our analysis provides several hints for anomalies in the CMB angular power spectra in tension with the standard cosmological model that persist even in these multi-parameter spaces. This indicates that either significant unaccounted-for systematics in the CMB data are producing biased results or that $\Lambda$CDM is an incorrect/incomplete description of Nature. We conclude that only future independent high-precision CMB temperature and polarization measurements could provide a definitive answer. Comment: 32 pages, 18 figures, 10 tables. V2: updated to match the PRD published version Text South pole ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Lambda ENVELOPE(-62.983,-62.983,-64.300,-64.300) South Pole Physical Review D 106 10
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
spellingShingle Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Di Valentino, Eleonora
Giarè, William
Melchiorri, Alessandro
Silk, Joseph
Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments
topic_facet Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
description We present an updated data-analysis comparison of the most recent observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature anisotropies and polarization angular power spectra released by four different experiments: the Planck satellite on one side, and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACTPol) and the South Pole Telescope (SPT-3G), combined with the WMAP satellite 9-years observation data in order to be "Planck-independent" on the other side. We investigate in a systematic way 8 extended cosmological models that differ from the baseline $\Lambda$CDM case by the inclusion of many different combinations of additional degrees of freedom, with the aim of finding a viable minimal extended model that can bring all the CMB experiments in agreement. Our analysis provides several hints for anomalies in the CMB angular power spectra in tension with the standard cosmological model that persist even in these multi-parameter spaces. This indicates that either significant unaccounted-for systematics in the CMB data are producing biased results or that $\Lambda$CDM is an incorrect/incomplete description of Nature. We conclude that only future independent high-precision CMB temperature and polarization measurements could provide a definitive answer. Comment: 32 pages, 18 figures, 10 tables. V2: updated to match the PRD published version
format Text
author Di Valentino, Eleonora
Giarè, William
Melchiorri, Alessandro
Silk, Joseph
author_facet Di Valentino, Eleonora
Giarè, William
Melchiorri, Alessandro
Silk, Joseph
author_sort Di Valentino, Eleonora
title Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments
title_short Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments
title_full Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments
title_fullStr Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments
title_full_unstemmed Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments
title_sort health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent cosmic microwave background anisotropies experiments
publishDate 2022
url http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12872
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506
long_lat ENVELOPE(-62.983,-62.983,-64.300,-64.300)
geographic Lambda
South Pole
geographic_facet Lambda
South Pole
genre South pole
genre_facet South pole
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12872
Phys. Rev. D 106, 103506 (2022)
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506
container_title Physical Review D
container_volume 106
container_issue 10
_version_ 1776203864111841280