Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments
We present an updated data-analysis comparison of the most recent observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature anisotropies and polarization angular power spectra released by four different experiments: the Planck satellite on one side, and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACTPol) and...
Published in: | Physical Review D |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12872 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506 |
id |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:2209.12872 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:2209.12872 2023-09-05T13:23:18+02:00 Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments Di Valentino, Eleonora Giarè, William Melchiorri, Alessandro Silk, Joseph 2022-09-26 http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12872 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12872 Phys. Rev. D 106, 103506 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506 Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics text 2022 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506 2023-08-16T17:18:04Z We present an updated data-analysis comparison of the most recent observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature anisotropies and polarization angular power spectra released by four different experiments: the Planck satellite on one side, and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACTPol) and the South Pole Telescope (SPT-3G), combined with the WMAP satellite 9-years observation data in order to be "Planck-independent" on the other side. We investigate in a systematic way 8 extended cosmological models that differ from the baseline $\Lambda$CDM case by the inclusion of many different combinations of additional degrees of freedom, with the aim of finding a viable minimal extended model that can bring all the CMB experiments in agreement. Our analysis provides several hints for anomalies in the CMB angular power spectra in tension with the standard cosmological model that persist even in these multi-parameter spaces. This indicates that either significant unaccounted-for systematics in the CMB data are producing biased results or that $\Lambda$CDM is an incorrect/incomplete description of Nature. We conclude that only future independent high-precision CMB temperature and polarization measurements could provide a definitive answer. Comment: 32 pages, 18 figures, 10 tables. V2: updated to match the PRD published version Text South pole ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Lambda ENVELOPE(-62.983,-62.983,-64.300,-64.300) South Pole Physical Review D 106 10 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) |
op_collection_id |
ftarxivpreprints |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics |
spellingShingle |
Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics Di Valentino, Eleonora Giarè, William Melchiorri, Alessandro Silk, Joseph Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments |
topic_facet |
Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics |
description |
We present an updated data-analysis comparison of the most recent observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature anisotropies and polarization angular power spectra released by four different experiments: the Planck satellite on one side, and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACTPol) and the South Pole Telescope (SPT-3G), combined with the WMAP satellite 9-years observation data in order to be "Planck-independent" on the other side. We investigate in a systematic way 8 extended cosmological models that differ from the baseline $\Lambda$CDM case by the inclusion of many different combinations of additional degrees of freedom, with the aim of finding a viable minimal extended model that can bring all the CMB experiments in agreement. Our analysis provides several hints for anomalies in the CMB angular power spectra in tension with the standard cosmological model that persist even in these multi-parameter spaces. This indicates that either significant unaccounted-for systematics in the CMB data are producing biased results or that $\Lambda$CDM is an incorrect/incomplete description of Nature. We conclude that only future independent high-precision CMB temperature and polarization measurements could provide a definitive answer. Comment: 32 pages, 18 figures, 10 tables. V2: updated to match the PRD published version |
format |
Text |
author |
Di Valentino, Eleonora Giarè, William Melchiorri, Alessandro Silk, Joseph |
author_facet |
Di Valentino, Eleonora Giarè, William Melchiorri, Alessandro Silk, Joseph |
author_sort |
Di Valentino, Eleonora |
title |
Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments |
title_short |
Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments |
title_full |
Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments |
title_fullStr |
Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments |
title_sort |
health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent cosmic microwave background anisotropies experiments |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12872 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-62.983,-62.983,-64.300,-64.300) |
geographic |
Lambda South Pole |
geographic_facet |
Lambda South Pole |
genre |
South pole |
genre_facet |
South pole |
op_relation |
http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12872 Phys. Rev. D 106, 103506 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103506 |
container_title |
Physical Review D |
container_volume |
106 |
container_issue |
10 |
_version_ |
1776203864111841280 |