Implicit representation of sparse hereditary families

For a hereditary family of graphs $\FF$, let $\FF_n$ denote the set of all members of $\FF$ on $n$ vertices. The speed of $\FF$ is the function $f(n)=|\FF_n|$. An implicit representation of size $\ell(n)$ for $\FF_n$ is a function assigning a label of $\ell(n)$ bits to each vertex of any given graph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alon, Noga
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.00328
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:2201.00328
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:2201.00328 2023-09-05T13:19:58+02:00 Implicit representation of sparse hereditary families Alon, Noga 2022-01-02 http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.00328 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.00328 Mathematics - Combinatorics Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics 05C78 68R10 G.2.2 text 2022 ftarxivpreprints 2023-08-16T16:51:55Z For a hereditary family of graphs $\FF$, let $\FF_n$ denote the set of all members of $\FF$ on $n$ vertices. The speed of $\FF$ is the function $f(n)=|\FF_n|$. An implicit representation of size $\ell(n)$ for $\FF_n$ is a function assigning a label of $\ell(n)$ bits to each vertex of any given graph $G \in \FF_n$, so that the adjacency between any pair of vertices can be determined by their labels. Bonamy, Esperet, Groenland and Scott proved that the minimum possible size of an implicit representation of $\FF_n$ for any hereditary family $\FF$ with speed $2^{\Omega(n^2)}$ is $(1+o(1)) \log_2 |\FF_n|/n~(=\Theta(n))$. A recent result of Hatami and Hatami shows that the situation is very different for very sparse hereditary families. They showed that for every $\delta>0$ there are hereditary families of graphs with speed $2^{O(n \log n)}$ that do not admit implicit representations of size smaller than $n^{1/2-\delta}$. In this note we show that even a mild speed bound ensures an implicit representation of size $O(n^c)$ for some $c<1$. Specifically we prove that for every $\eps>0$ there is an integer $d \geq 1$ so that if $\FF$ is a hereditary family with speed $f(n) \leq 2^{(1/4-\eps)n^2}$ then $\FF_n$ admits an implicit representation of size $O(n^{1-1/d} \log n)$. Moreover, for every integer $d>1$ there is a hereditary family for which this is tight up to the logarithmic factor. Text Groenland ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Mathematics - Combinatorics
Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics
05C78
68R10
G.2.2
spellingShingle Mathematics - Combinatorics
Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics
05C78
68R10
G.2.2
Alon, Noga
Implicit representation of sparse hereditary families
topic_facet Mathematics - Combinatorics
Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics
05C78
68R10
G.2.2
description For a hereditary family of graphs $\FF$, let $\FF_n$ denote the set of all members of $\FF$ on $n$ vertices. The speed of $\FF$ is the function $f(n)=|\FF_n|$. An implicit representation of size $\ell(n)$ for $\FF_n$ is a function assigning a label of $\ell(n)$ bits to each vertex of any given graph $G \in \FF_n$, so that the adjacency between any pair of vertices can be determined by their labels. Bonamy, Esperet, Groenland and Scott proved that the minimum possible size of an implicit representation of $\FF_n$ for any hereditary family $\FF$ with speed $2^{\Omega(n^2)}$ is $(1+o(1)) \log_2 |\FF_n|/n~(=\Theta(n))$. A recent result of Hatami and Hatami shows that the situation is very different for very sparse hereditary families. They showed that for every $\delta>0$ there are hereditary families of graphs with speed $2^{O(n \log n)}$ that do not admit implicit representations of size smaller than $n^{1/2-\delta}$. In this note we show that even a mild speed bound ensures an implicit representation of size $O(n^c)$ for some $c<1$. Specifically we prove that for every $\eps>0$ there is an integer $d \geq 1$ so that if $\FF$ is a hereditary family with speed $f(n) \leq 2^{(1/4-\eps)n^2}$ then $\FF_n$ admits an implicit representation of size $O(n^{1-1/d} \log n)$. Moreover, for every integer $d>1$ there is a hereditary family for which this is tight up to the logarithmic factor.
format Text
author Alon, Noga
author_facet Alon, Noga
author_sort Alon, Noga
title Implicit representation of sparse hereditary families
title_short Implicit representation of sparse hereditary families
title_full Implicit representation of sparse hereditary families
title_fullStr Implicit representation of sparse hereditary families
title_full_unstemmed Implicit representation of sparse hereditary families
title_sort implicit representation of sparse hereditary families
publishDate 2022
url http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.00328
genre Groenland
genre_facet Groenland
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.00328
_version_ 1776200732139061248