Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data

The standard smooth electrical resistivity tomography inversion produces an estimate of subsurface conductivity that has blurred boundaries, damped magnitudes, and often contains inversion artifacts. In many problems the expected conductivity structure is well constrained in some parts of the subsur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers & Geosciences
Main Authors: Herring, Teddi, Heagy, Lindsey J., Pidlisecky, Adam, Cey, Edwin
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10354
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104986
_version_ 1821682707981139968
author Herring, Teddi
Heagy, Lindsey J.
Pidlisecky, Adam
Cey, Edwin
author_facet Herring, Teddi
Heagy, Lindsey J.
Pidlisecky, Adam
Cey, Edwin
author_sort Herring, Teddi
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
container_start_page 104986
container_title Computers & Geosciences
container_volume 159
description The standard smooth electrical resistivity tomography inversion produces an estimate of subsurface conductivity that has blurred boundaries, damped magnitudes, and often contains inversion artifacts. In many problems the expected conductivity structure is well constrained in some parts of the subsurface, but incorporating prior information in the inversion is not a trivial task. In this study we developed an electrical resistivity tomography inversion algorithm that combines parametric and smooth inversion strategies. In regions where the subsurface is well constrained, the model was parameterized with only a few variables, while the rest of the subsurface was parameterized with voxels. We tested this hybrid inversion strategy on two synthetic models that contained a well constrained highly resistive or conductive near-surface horizontal layer and a target beneath. In each testing scenario, the hybrid inversion improved resolution of feature boundaries and magnitudes and had fewer inversion artifacts than the standard smooth inversion. A sensitivity analysis showed that the hybrid inversion successfully recovered subsurface features when a range of regularization parameters, initial models, and data noise levels were tested. The hybrid inversion strategy can potentially be expanded to a range of applications including marine surveys, permafrost/frozen ground studies, urban geophysics, or anywhere that prior information allows part of the model to be constrained with simple geometric shapes.
format Text
genre permafrost
genre_facet permafrost
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:2107.10354
institution Open Polar
language unknown
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104986
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10354
doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104986
publishDate 2021
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:2107.10354 2025-01-17T00:16:45+00:00 Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data Herring, Teddi Heagy, Lindsey J. Pidlisecky, Adam Cey, Edwin 2021-07-21 http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10354 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104986 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10354 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104986 Physics - Geophysics text 2021 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104986 2023-08-16T16:36:09Z The standard smooth electrical resistivity tomography inversion produces an estimate of subsurface conductivity that has blurred boundaries, damped magnitudes, and often contains inversion artifacts. In many problems the expected conductivity structure is well constrained in some parts of the subsurface, but incorporating prior information in the inversion is not a trivial task. In this study we developed an electrical resistivity tomography inversion algorithm that combines parametric and smooth inversion strategies. In regions where the subsurface is well constrained, the model was parameterized with only a few variables, while the rest of the subsurface was parameterized with voxels. We tested this hybrid inversion strategy on two synthetic models that contained a well constrained highly resistive or conductive near-surface horizontal layer and a target beneath. In each testing scenario, the hybrid inversion improved resolution of feature boundaries and magnitudes and had fewer inversion artifacts than the standard smooth inversion. A sensitivity analysis showed that the hybrid inversion successfully recovered subsurface features when a range of regularization parameters, initial models, and data noise levels were tested. The hybrid inversion strategy can potentially be expanded to a range of applications including marine surveys, permafrost/frozen ground studies, urban geophysics, or anywhere that prior information allows part of the model to be constrained with simple geometric shapes. Text permafrost ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Computers & Geosciences 159 104986
spellingShingle Physics - Geophysics
Herring, Teddi
Heagy, Lindsey J.
Pidlisecky, Adam
Cey, Edwin
Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
title Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
title_full Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
title_fullStr Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
title_full_unstemmed Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
title_short Hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
title_sort hybrid parametric/smooth inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data
topic Physics - Geophysics
topic_facet Physics - Geophysics
url http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10354
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104986