Unbiased Evaluation of Deep Metric Learning Algorithms

Deep metric learning (DML) is a popular approach for images retrieval, solving verification (same or not) problems and addressing open set classification. Arguably, the most common DML approach is with triplet loss, despite significant advances in the area of DML. Triplet loss suffers from several i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fehervari, Istvan, Ravichandran, Avinash, Appalaraju, Srikar
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2019
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12528
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1911.12528
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1911.12528 2023-09-05T13:19:04+02:00 Unbiased Evaluation of Deep Metric Learning Algorithms Fehervari, Istvan Ravichandran, Avinash Appalaraju, Srikar 2019-11-27 http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12528 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12528 Computer Science - Machine Learning Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Statistics - Machine Learning text 2019 ftarxivpreprints 2023-08-16T15:37:52Z Deep metric learning (DML) is a popular approach for images retrieval, solving verification (same or not) problems and addressing open set classification. Arguably, the most common DML approach is with triplet loss, despite significant advances in the area of DML. Triplet loss suffers from several issues such as collapse of the embeddings, high sensitivity to sampling schemes and more importantly a lack of performance when compared to more modern methods. We attribute this adoption to a lack of fair comparisons between various methods and the difficulty in adopting them for novel problem statements. In this paper, we perform an unbiased comparison of the most popular DML baseline methods under same conditions and more importantly, not obfuscating any hyper parameter tuning or adjustment needed to favor a particular method. We find, that under equal conditions several older methods perform significantly better than previously believed. In fact, our unified implementation of 12 recently introduced DML algorithms achieve state-of-the art performance on CUB200, CAR196, and Stanford Online products datasets which establishes a new set of baselines for future DML research. The codebase and all tuned hyperparameters will be open-sourced for reproducibility and to serve as a source of benchmark. Text DML ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Computer Science - Machine Learning
Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Statistics - Machine Learning
spellingShingle Computer Science - Machine Learning
Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Statistics - Machine Learning
Fehervari, Istvan
Ravichandran, Avinash
Appalaraju, Srikar
Unbiased Evaluation of Deep Metric Learning Algorithms
topic_facet Computer Science - Machine Learning
Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Statistics - Machine Learning
description Deep metric learning (DML) is a popular approach for images retrieval, solving verification (same or not) problems and addressing open set classification. Arguably, the most common DML approach is with triplet loss, despite significant advances in the area of DML. Triplet loss suffers from several issues such as collapse of the embeddings, high sensitivity to sampling schemes and more importantly a lack of performance when compared to more modern methods. We attribute this adoption to a lack of fair comparisons between various methods and the difficulty in adopting them for novel problem statements. In this paper, we perform an unbiased comparison of the most popular DML baseline methods under same conditions and more importantly, not obfuscating any hyper parameter tuning or adjustment needed to favor a particular method. We find, that under equal conditions several older methods perform significantly better than previously believed. In fact, our unified implementation of 12 recently introduced DML algorithms achieve state-of-the art performance on CUB200, CAR196, and Stanford Online products datasets which establishes a new set of baselines for future DML research. The codebase and all tuned hyperparameters will be open-sourced for reproducibility and to serve as a source of benchmark.
format Text
author Fehervari, Istvan
Ravichandran, Avinash
Appalaraju, Srikar
author_facet Fehervari, Istvan
Ravichandran, Avinash
Appalaraju, Srikar
author_sort Fehervari, Istvan
title Unbiased Evaluation of Deep Metric Learning Algorithms
title_short Unbiased Evaluation of Deep Metric Learning Algorithms
title_full Unbiased Evaluation of Deep Metric Learning Algorithms
title_fullStr Unbiased Evaluation of Deep Metric Learning Algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Unbiased Evaluation of Deep Metric Learning Algorithms
title_sort unbiased evaluation of deep metric learning algorithms
publishDate 2019
url http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12528
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12528
_version_ 1776199882024943616