Reflections On the Anomalous ANITA Events: The Antarctic Subsurface as a Possible Explanation
The ANITA balloon experiment was designed to detect radio signals initiated by neutrinos and cosmic ray air showers. These signals are typically discriminated by the polarization and phase inversions of the radio signal. The reflected signal from cosmic rays suffer phase inversion compared to a dire...
Published in: | Annals of Glaciology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02846 https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.19 |
id |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1905.02846 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1905.02846 2023-09-05T13:12:02+02:00 Reflections On the Anomalous ANITA Events: The Antarctic Subsurface as a Possible Explanation Shoemaker, Ian M. Kusenko, Alexander Munneke, Peter Kuipers Romero-Wolf, Andrew Schroeder, Dustin M. Siegert, Martin J. 2019-05-07 http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02846 https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.19 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02846 Annals of Glaciology 1--7, 2020 doi:10.1017/aog.2020.19 Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena High Energy Physics - Phenomenology text 2019 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.19 2023-08-16T15:19:17Z The ANITA balloon experiment was designed to detect radio signals initiated by neutrinos and cosmic ray air showers. These signals are typically discriminated by the polarization and phase inversions of the radio signal. The reflected signal from cosmic rays suffer phase inversion compared to a direct tau neutrino event. In this paper we study sub-surface reflection, which can occur without phase inversion, in the context of the two anomalous up-going events reported by ANITA. We find that subsurface layers and firn density inversions may plausibly account for the events, while ice fabric layers and wind ablation crusts could also play a role. This hypothesis can be tested with radar surveying of the Antarctic region in the vicinity of the anomalous ANITA events. Future experiments should not use phase inversion as a sole criterion to discriminate between downgoing and upgoing events, unless the subsurface reflection properties are well understood. Comment: 4+2 pages, 3 figures Text Annals of Glaciology Antarc* Antarctic ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Antarctic The Antarctic Annals of Glaciology 61 81 92 98 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) |
op_collection_id |
ftarxivpreprints |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena High Energy Physics - Phenomenology |
spellingShingle |
Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena High Energy Physics - Phenomenology Shoemaker, Ian M. Kusenko, Alexander Munneke, Peter Kuipers Romero-Wolf, Andrew Schroeder, Dustin M. Siegert, Martin J. Reflections On the Anomalous ANITA Events: The Antarctic Subsurface as a Possible Explanation |
topic_facet |
Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena High Energy Physics - Phenomenology |
description |
The ANITA balloon experiment was designed to detect radio signals initiated by neutrinos and cosmic ray air showers. These signals are typically discriminated by the polarization and phase inversions of the radio signal. The reflected signal from cosmic rays suffer phase inversion compared to a direct tau neutrino event. In this paper we study sub-surface reflection, which can occur without phase inversion, in the context of the two anomalous up-going events reported by ANITA. We find that subsurface layers and firn density inversions may plausibly account for the events, while ice fabric layers and wind ablation crusts could also play a role. This hypothesis can be tested with radar surveying of the Antarctic region in the vicinity of the anomalous ANITA events. Future experiments should not use phase inversion as a sole criterion to discriminate between downgoing and upgoing events, unless the subsurface reflection properties are well understood. Comment: 4+2 pages, 3 figures |
format |
Text |
author |
Shoemaker, Ian M. Kusenko, Alexander Munneke, Peter Kuipers Romero-Wolf, Andrew Schroeder, Dustin M. Siegert, Martin J. |
author_facet |
Shoemaker, Ian M. Kusenko, Alexander Munneke, Peter Kuipers Romero-Wolf, Andrew Schroeder, Dustin M. Siegert, Martin J. |
author_sort |
Shoemaker, Ian M. |
title |
Reflections On the Anomalous ANITA Events: The Antarctic Subsurface as a Possible Explanation |
title_short |
Reflections On the Anomalous ANITA Events: The Antarctic Subsurface as a Possible Explanation |
title_full |
Reflections On the Anomalous ANITA Events: The Antarctic Subsurface as a Possible Explanation |
title_fullStr |
Reflections On the Anomalous ANITA Events: The Antarctic Subsurface as a Possible Explanation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reflections On the Anomalous ANITA Events: The Antarctic Subsurface as a Possible Explanation |
title_sort |
reflections on the anomalous anita events: the antarctic subsurface as a possible explanation |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02846 https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.19 |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
genre |
Annals of Glaciology Antarc* Antarctic |
genre_facet |
Annals of Glaciology Antarc* Antarctic |
op_relation |
http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02846 Annals of Glaciology 1--7, 2020 doi:10.1017/aog.2020.19 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.19 |
container_title |
Annals of Glaciology |
container_volume |
61 |
container_issue |
81 |
container_start_page |
92 |
op_container_end_page |
98 |
_version_ |
1776198651565047808 |