Arctic amplification metrics

One of the defining features of both recent and historical cases of global climate change is Arctic Amplification (AA). This is the more rapid change in the surface air temperature (SAT) in the Arctic compared to some wider reference region, such as the Northern Hemisphere (NH) mean. Many different...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Davy, Richard, Chen, Linling, Hanna, Edward
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03885
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1810.03885
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1810.03885 2023-09-05T13:16:46+02:00 Arctic amplification metrics Davy, Richard Chen, Linling Hanna, Edward 2018-10-09 http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03885 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03885 Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics text 2018 ftarxivpreprints 2023-08-16T15:01:53Z One of the defining features of both recent and historical cases of global climate change is Arctic Amplification (AA). This is the more rapid change in the surface air temperature (SAT) in the Arctic compared to some wider reference region, such as the Northern Hemisphere (NH) mean. Many different metrics have been developed to quantify the degree of AA based on SAT anomalies, trends and variability. The use of different metrics, as well as the choice of dataset to use can affect conclusions about the magnitude and temporal variability of AA. Here we review the established metrics of AA to see how well they agree upon the temporal signature of AA, such as the multi-decadal variability, and assess the consistency in these metrics across different commonly-used datasets which cover both the early and late 20th century warming in the Arctic. We find the NOAA 20th Century Reanalysis most closely matches the observations when using metrics based upon SAT trends (A2), variability (A3) and regression (A4) of the SAT anomalies, and the ERA 20th Century Reanalysis is closest to the observations in the SAT anomalies (A1) and variability of SAT anomalies (A3). However, there are large seasonal differences in the consistency between datasets. Moreover, the largest differences between the century-long reanalysis products and observations are during the early warming period, likely due to the sparseness of the observations in the Arctic at that time. In the modern warming period, the high density of observations strongly constrains all the reanalysis products, whether they include satellite observations or only surface observations. Thus, all the reanalysis and observation products produce very similar magnitudes and temporal variability in the degree of AA during the recent warming period. Text Arctic Climate change ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
spellingShingle Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
Davy, Richard
Chen, Linling
Hanna, Edward
Arctic amplification metrics
topic_facet Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
description One of the defining features of both recent and historical cases of global climate change is Arctic Amplification (AA). This is the more rapid change in the surface air temperature (SAT) in the Arctic compared to some wider reference region, such as the Northern Hemisphere (NH) mean. Many different metrics have been developed to quantify the degree of AA based on SAT anomalies, trends and variability. The use of different metrics, as well as the choice of dataset to use can affect conclusions about the magnitude and temporal variability of AA. Here we review the established metrics of AA to see how well they agree upon the temporal signature of AA, such as the multi-decadal variability, and assess the consistency in these metrics across different commonly-used datasets which cover both the early and late 20th century warming in the Arctic. We find the NOAA 20th Century Reanalysis most closely matches the observations when using metrics based upon SAT trends (A2), variability (A3) and regression (A4) of the SAT anomalies, and the ERA 20th Century Reanalysis is closest to the observations in the SAT anomalies (A1) and variability of SAT anomalies (A3). However, there are large seasonal differences in the consistency between datasets. Moreover, the largest differences between the century-long reanalysis products and observations are during the early warming period, likely due to the sparseness of the observations in the Arctic at that time. In the modern warming period, the high density of observations strongly constrains all the reanalysis products, whether they include satellite observations or only surface observations. Thus, all the reanalysis and observation products produce very similar magnitudes and temporal variability in the degree of AA during the recent warming period.
format Text
author Davy, Richard
Chen, Linling
Hanna, Edward
author_facet Davy, Richard
Chen, Linling
Hanna, Edward
author_sort Davy, Richard
title Arctic amplification metrics
title_short Arctic amplification metrics
title_full Arctic amplification metrics
title_fullStr Arctic amplification metrics
title_full_unstemmed Arctic amplification metrics
title_sort arctic amplification metrics
publishDate 2018
url http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03885
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03885
_version_ 1776198232052858880