Galerkin Least-Squares Stabilization in Ice Sheet Modeling - Accuracy, Robustness, and Comparison to other Techniques

We investigate the accuracy and robustness of one of the most common methods used in glaciology for the discretization of the $\mathfrak{p}$-Stokes equations: equal order finite elements with Galerkin Least-Squares (GLS) stabilization. Furthermore we compare the results to other stabilized methods....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computational Geosciences
Main Authors: Helanow, Christian, Ahlkrona, Josefin
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08369
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9713-5
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1702.08369
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1702.08369 2023-09-05T13:20:18+02:00 Galerkin Least-Squares Stabilization in Ice Sheet Modeling - Accuracy, Robustness, and Comparison to other Techniques Helanow, Christian Ahlkrona, Josefin 2017-02-27 http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08369 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9713-5 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08369 J. Comput Geosci (2018) 22: 951 doi:10.1007/s10596-017-9713-5 Physics - Computational Physics Physics - Fluid Dynamics Physics - Geophysics 86A40 (primary) 76M10 76A05 76A20 text 2017 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9713-5 2023-08-16T14:18:14Z We investigate the accuracy and robustness of one of the most common methods used in glaciology for the discretization of the $\mathfrak{p}$-Stokes equations: equal order finite elements with Galerkin Least-Squares (GLS) stabilization. Furthermore we compare the results to other stabilized methods. We find that the vertical velocity component is more sensitive to the choice of GLS stabilization parameter than horizontal velocity. Additionally, the accuracy of the vertical velocity component is especially important since errors in this component can cause ice surface instabilities and propagate into future ice volume predictions. If the element cell size is set to the minimum edge length and the stabilization parameter is allowed to vary non-linearly with viscosity, the GLS stabilization parameter found in literature is a good choice on simple domains. However, near ice margins the standard parameter choice may result in significant oscillations in the vertical component of the surface velocity. For these cases, other stabilization techniques, such as the interior penalty method, result in better accuracy and are less sensitive to the choice of the stabilization parameter. During this work we also discovered that the manufactured solutions often used to evaluate errors in glaciology are not reliable due to high artificial surface forces at singularities. We perform our numerical experiments in both FEniCS and Elmer/Ice. Comment: 32 pages, 17 figures Text Ice Sheet ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Computational Geosciences 22 4 951 974
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Physics - Computational Physics
Physics - Fluid Dynamics
Physics - Geophysics
86A40 (primary) 76M10
76A05
76A20
spellingShingle Physics - Computational Physics
Physics - Fluid Dynamics
Physics - Geophysics
86A40 (primary) 76M10
76A05
76A20
Helanow, Christian
Ahlkrona, Josefin
Galerkin Least-Squares Stabilization in Ice Sheet Modeling - Accuracy, Robustness, and Comparison to other Techniques
topic_facet Physics - Computational Physics
Physics - Fluid Dynamics
Physics - Geophysics
86A40 (primary) 76M10
76A05
76A20
description We investigate the accuracy and robustness of one of the most common methods used in glaciology for the discretization of the $\mathfrak{p}$-Stokes equations: equal order finite elements with Galerkin Least-Squares (GLS) stabilization. Furthermore we compare the results to other stabilized methods. We find that the vertical velocity component is more sensitive to the choice of GLS stabilization parameter than horizontal velocity. Additionally, the accuracy of the vertical velocity component is especially important since errors in this component can cause ice surface instabilities and propagate into future ice volume predictions. If the element cell size is set to the minimum edge length and the stabilization parameter is allowed to vary non-linearly with viscosity, the GLS stabilization parameter found in literature is a good choice on simple domains. However, near ice margins the standard parameter choice may result in significant oscillations in the vertical component of the surface velocity. For these cases, other stabilization techniques, such as the interior penalty method, result in better accuracy and are less sensitive to the choice of the stabilization parameter. During this work we also discovered that the manufactured solutions often used to evaluate errors in glaciology are not reliable due to high artificial surface forces at singularities. We perform our numerical experiments in both FEniCS and Elmer/Ice. Comment: 32 pages, 17 figures
format Text
author Helanow, Christian
Ahlkrona, Josefin
author_facet Helanow, Christian
Ahlkrona, Josefin
author_sort Helanow, Christian
title Galerkin Least-Squares Stabilization in Ice Sheet Modeling - Accuracy, Robustness, and Comparison to other Techniques
title_short Galerkin Least-Squares Stabilization in Ice Sheet Modeling - Accuracy, Robustness, and Comparison to other Techniques
title_full Galerkin Least-Squares Stabilization in Ice Sheet Modeling - Accuracy, Robustness, and Comparison to other Techniques
title_fullStr Galerkin Least-Squares Stabilization in Ice Sheet Modeling - Accuracy, Robustness, and Comparison to other Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Galerkin Least-Squares Stabilization in Ice Sheet Modeling - Accuracy, Robustness, and Comparison to other Techniques
title_sort galerkin least-squares stabilization in ice sheet modeling - accuracy, robustness, and comparison to other techniques
publishDate 2017
url http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08369
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9713-5
genre Ice Sheet
genre_facet Ice Sheet
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08369
J. Comput Geosci (2018) 22: 951
doi:10.1007/s10596-017-9713-5
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9713-5
container_title Computational Geosciences
container_volume 22
container_issue 4
container_start_page 951
op_container_end_page 974
_version_ 1776201001262383104