Reply to comment by K.A. Duderstadt et al. on "Atmospheric ionization by high-fluence, hard spectrum solar proton events and their probable appearance in the ice core archive"

Duderstadt et al. [2016b] comment that the Melott et al. [2016] study of nitrate formation by solar proton events (SPEs) and comparison with the ice core archive is "fundamentally flawed," because it does not include pre-existing HNO3 in the stratosphere. We show that they exaggerate both...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laird, Claude M., Melott, Adrian L., Thomas, Brian C., Neuenswander, Ben, Atri, Dimitra
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08792
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1606.08792
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1606.08792 2023-09-05T13:20:11+02:00 Reply to comment by K.A. Duderstadt et al. on "Atmospheric ionization by high-fluence, hard spectrum solar proton events and their probable appearance in the ice core archive" Laird, Claude M. Melott, Adrian L. Thomas, Brian C. Neuenswander, Ben Atri, Dimitra 2016-06-28 http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08792 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08792 Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics Astrophysics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics Physics - Geophysics text 2016 ftarxivpreprints 2023-08-16T14:03:06Z Duderstadt et al. [2016b] comment that the Melott et al. [2016] study of nitrate formation by solar proton events (SPEs) and comparison with the ice core archive is "fundamentally flawed," because it does not include pre-existing HNO3 in the stratosphere. We show that they exaggerate both the enhancement predicted by our findings and pre-industrial HNO3 levels in their model, and fail to prove this assertion. Our feasibility study matched expected SPE nitrate production with ground truth measurements. It is not clear that their approach is more realistic and absence of a detailed mechanism does not disprove our results. Models can be no better than the information they are provided and in this case there continue to be significant unknowns and uncertainties, especially in the role of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) and possible interactions with cosmic rays that constitute lower boundary conditions. Duderstadt et al. [2014; 2016a] used incomplete, poorly-constrained and incorrect initial and boundary conditions, and they continue to advocate on the basis of uncertain results. Meanwhile, Smart et al. [2014] identified a series of ice core nitrate spikes that have since been confirmed in 10Be by McCracken and Beer [2015]. Melott et al. [2016] computationally reproduced the ionization profile of the only major balloon measurements to date. We show that our calculated nitrate enhancement is consistent with measured results, given current levels of uncertainty, and that extreme SPEs can potentially produce occasional nitrate spikes with hundreds of percent increases. Instead of repeating old arguments to dismiss nitrates as proxies of SPEs, it is past time for a dedicated, fine-resolution, multi-parameter, replicate ice core field campaign to resolve this debate. Comment: Invited reply, submitted to JGR-Atmospheres Text ice core ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
Astrophysics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Physics - Geophysics
spellingShingle Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
Astrophysics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Physics - Geophysics
Laird, Claude M.
Melott, Adrian L.
Thomas, Brian C.
Neuenswander, Ben
Atri, Dimitra
Reply to comment by K.A. Duderstadt et al. on "Atmospheric ionization by high-fluence, hard spectrum solar proton events and their probable appearance in the ice core archive"
topic_facet Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
Astrophysics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Physics - Geophysics
description Duderstadt et al. [2016b] comment that the Melott et al. [2016] study of nitrate formation by solar proton events (SPEs) and comparison with the ice core archive is "fundamentally flawed," because it does not include pre-existing HNO3 in the stratosphere. We show that they exaggerate both the enhancement predicted by our findings and pre-industrial HNO3 levels in their model, and fail to prove this assertion. Our feasibility study matched expected SPE nitrate production with ground truth measurements. It is not clear that their approach is more realistic and absence of a detailed mechanism does not disprove our results. Models can be no better than the information they are provided and in this case there continue to be significant unknowns and uncertainties, especially in the role of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) and possible interactions with cosmic rays that constitute lower boundary conditions. Duderstadt et al. [2014; 2016a] used incomplete, poorly-constrained and incorrect initial and boundary conditions, and they continue to advocate on the basis of uncertain results. Meanwhile, Smart et al. [2014] identified a series of ice core nitrate spikes that have since been confirmed in 10Be by McCracken and Beer [2015]. Melott et al. [2016] computationally reproduced the ionization profile of the only major balloon measurements to date. We show that our calculated nitrate enhancement is consistent with measured results, given current levels of uncertainty, and that extreme SPEs can potentially produce occasional nitrate spikes with hundreds of percent increases. Instead of repeating old arguments to dismiss nitrates as proxies of SPEs, it is past time for a dedicated, fine-resolution, multi-parameter, replicate ice core field campaign to resolve this debate. Comment: Invited reply, submitted to JGR-Atmospheres
format Text
author Laird, Claude M.
Melott, Adrian L.
Thomas, Brian C.
Neuenswander, Ben
Atri, Dimitra
author_facet Laird, Claude M.
Melott, Adrian L.
Thomas, Brian C.
Neuenswander, Ben
Atri, Dimitra
author_sort Laird, Claude M.
title Reply to comment by K.A. Duderstadt et al. on "Atmospheric ionization by high-fluence, hard spectrum solar proton events and their probable appearance in the ice core archive"
title_short Reply to comment by K.A. Duderstadt et al. on "Atmospheric ionization by high-fluence, hard spectrum solar proton events and their probable appearance in the ice core archive"
title_full Reply to comment by K.A. Duderstadt et al. on "Atmospheric ionization by high-fluence, hard spectrum solar proton events and their probable appearance in the ice core archive"
title_fullStr Reply to comment by K.A. Duderstadt et al. on "Atmospheric ionization by high-fluence, hard spectrum solar proton events and their probable appearance in the ice core archive"
title_full_unstemmed Reply to comment by K.A. Duderstadt et al. on "Atmospheric ionization by high-fluence, hard spectrum solar proton events and their probable appearance in the ice core archive"
title_sort reply to comment by k.a. duderstadt et al. on "atmospheric ionization by high-fluence, hard spectrum solar proton events and their probable appearance in the ice core archive"
publishDate 2016
url http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08792
genre ice core
genre_facet ice core
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08792
_version_ 1776200901610962944