The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements

It has been suggested that the deficit in the number of spots on the surface of the Sun between 1790 and 1830, known as the Dalton minimum, contained an extra cycle that was not identified in the original sunspot record by Wolf. Though this cycle would be shorter and weaker than the average solar cy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Astronomy & Astrophysics
Main Authors: Karoff, C., Inceoglu, F., Knudsen, M. F., Olsen, J., Fogtmann-Schulz, A.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.2931
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424927
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1412.2931
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1412.2931 2023-09-05T13:19:54+02:00 The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements Karoff, C. Inceoglu, F. Knudsen, M. F. Olsen, J. Fogtmann-Schulz, A. 2014-12-09 http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.2931 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424927 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.2931 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424927 Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics text 2014 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424927 2023-08-16T13:30:46Z It has been suggested that the deficit in the number of spots on the surface of the Sun between 1790 and 1830, known as the Dalton minimum, contained an extra cycle that was not identified in the original sunspot record by Wolf. Though this cycle would be shorter and weaker than the average solar cycle, it would shift the magnetic parity of the solar magnetic field of the earlier cycles. This extra cycle is sometimes referred to as the 'lost solar cycle' or 'cycle 4b'. Here we reanalyse Be10 measurements with annual resolution from the NGRIP ice core in Greenland in order to investigate if the hypothesis regarding a lost sunspot cycle is supported by these measurements. Specifically, we make use of the fact that the Galactic cosmic rays, responsible for forming Be10 in the Earth's atmosphere, are affected differently by the open solar magnetic field during even and odd solar cycles. This fact enables us to evaluate if the numbering of cycles earlier than cycle 5 is correct. For the evaluation, we use Bayesian analysis, which reveals that the lost sunspot cycle hypothesis is likely to be correct. We also discuss if this cycle 4b is a real cycle, or a phase catastrophe, and what implications this has for our understanding of stellar activity cycles in general. Comment: accepted for publication in A&A Text Greenland ice core NGRIP ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Greenland Astronomy & Astrophysics 575 A77
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
spellingShingle Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Karoff, C.
Inceoglu, F.
Knudsen, M. F.
Olsen, J.
Fogtmann-Schulz, A.
The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements
topic_facet Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
description It has been suggested that the deficit in the number of spots on the surface of the Sun between 1790 and 1830, known as the Dalton minimum, contained an extra cycle that was not identified in the original sunspot record by Wolf. Though this cycle would be shorter and weaker than the average solar cycle, it would shift the magnetic parity of the solar magnetic field of the earlier cycles. This extra cycle is sometimes referred to as the 'lost solar cycle' or 'cycle 4b'. Here we reanalyse Be10 measurements with annual resolution from the NGRIP ice core in Greenland in order to investigate if the hypothesis regarding a lost sunspot cycle is supported by these measurements. Specifically, we make use of the fact that the Galactic cosmic rays, responsible for forming Be10 in the Earth's atmosphere, are affected differently by the open solar magnetic field during even and odd solar cycles. This fact enables us to evaluate if the numbering of cycles earlier than cycle 5 is correct. For the evaluation, we use Bayesian analysis, which reveals that the lost sunspot cycle hypothesis is likely to be correct. We also discuss if this cycle 4b is a real cycle, or a phase catastrophe, and what implications this has for our understanding of stellar activity cycles in general. Comment: accepted for publication in A&A
format Text
author Karoff, C.
Inceoglu, F.
Knudsen, M. F.
Olsen, J.
Fogtmann-Schulz, A.
author_facet Karoff, C.
Inceoglu, F.
Knudsen, M. F.
Olsen, J.
Fogtmann-Schulz, A.
author_sort Karoff, C.
title The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements
title_short The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements
title_full The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements
title_fullStr The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements
title_full_unstemmed The lost sunspot cycle: New support from Be10 measurements
title_sort lost sunspot cycle: new support from be10 measurements
publishDate 2014
url http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.2931
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424927
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
ice core
NGRIP
genre_facet Greenland
ice core
NGRIP
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.2931
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424927
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424927
container_title Astronomy & Astrophysics
container_volume 575
container_start_page A77
_version_ 1776200685285539840