Refraction of swell by surface currents

Using recordings of swell from pitch-and-roll buoys, we have reproduced the classic observations of long-range surface wave propagation originally made by Munk et al. (1963) using a triangular array of bottom pressure measurements. In the modern data, the direction of the incoming swell fluctuates b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gallet, Basile, Young, William R.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1676
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1410.1676
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1410.1676 2023-09-05T13:14:03+02:00 Refraction of swell by surface currents Gallet, Basile Young, William R. 2014-10-07 http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1676 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1676 Physics - Fluid Dynamics Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics text 2014 ftarxivpreprints 2023-08-16T13:27:21Z Using recordings of swell from pitch-and-roll buoys, we have reproduced the classic observations of long-range surface wave propagation originally made by Munk et al. (1963) using a triangular array of bottom pressure measurements. In the modern data, the direction of the incoming swell fluctuates by about $\pm 10^\circ$ on a time scale of one hour. But if the incoming direction is averaged over the duration of an event then, in contrast with the observations by Munk et al. (1963), the sources inferred by great-circle backtracking are most often in good agreement with the location of large storms on weather maps of the Southern Ocean. However there are a few puzzling failures of great-circle backtracking e.g., in one case, the direct great-circle route is blocked by the Tuamoto Islands and the inferred source falls on New Zealand. Mirages like this occur more frequently in the bottom-pressure observations of Munk et al. (1963), where several inferred sources fell on the Antarctic continent. Using spherical ray tracing we investigate the hypothesis that the refraction of waves by surface currents produces the mirages. With reconstructions of surface currents inferred from satellite altimetry, we show that mesoscale vorticity significantly deflects swell away from great-circle propagation so that the source and receiver are connected by a bundle of many rays, none of which precisely follow a great circle. The $\pm 10^\circ$ directional fluctuations at the receiver result from the arrival of wave packets that have travelled along the different rays within this multipath. The occasional failure of great-circle backtracking, and the associated mirages, probably results from partial topographic obstruction of the multipath, which biases the directional average at the receiver. Comment: Journal of Marine Research, in press Text Antarc* Antarctic Southern Ocean ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Antarctic Mirages ENVELOPE(141.446,141.446,-66.797,-66.797) Munk ENVELOPE(-95.993,-95.993,55.979,55.979) New Zealand Southern Ocean The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Physics - Fluid Dynamics
Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
spellingShingle Physics - Fluid Dynamics
Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
Gallet, Basile
Young, William R.
Refraction of swell by surface currents
topic_facet Physics - Fluid Dynamics
Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
description Using recordings of swell from pitch-and-roll buoys, we have reproduced the classic observations of long-range surface wave propagation originally made by Munk et al. (1963) using a triangular array of bottom pressure measurements. In the modern data, the direction of the incoming swell fluctuates by about $\pm 10^\circ$ on a time scale of one hour. But if the incoming direction is averaged over the duration of an event then, in contrast with the observations by Munk et al. (1963), the sources inferred by great-circle backtracking are most often in good agreement with the location of large storms on weather maps of the Southern Ocean. However there are a few puzzling failures of great-circle backtracking e.g., in one case, the direct great-circle route is blocked by the Tuamoto Islands and the inferred source falls on New Zealand. Mirages like this occur more frequently in the bottom-pressure observations of Munk et al. (1963), where several inferred sources fell on the Antarctic continent. Using spherical ray tracing we investigate the hypothesis that the refraction of waves by surface currents produces the mirages. With reconstructions of surface currents inferred from satellite altimetry, we show that mesoscale vorticity significantly deflects swell away from great-circle propagation so that the source and receiver are connected by a bundle of many rays, none of which precisely follow a great circle. The $\pm 10^\circ$ directional fluctuations at the receiver result from the arrival of wave packets that have travelled along the different rays within this multipath. The occasional failure of great-circle backtracking, and the associated mirages, probably results from partial topographic obstruction of the multipath, which biases the directional average at the receiver. Comment: Journal of Marine Research, in press
format Text
author Gallet, Basile
Young, William R.
author_facet Gallet, Basile
Young, William R.
author_sort Gallet, Basile
title Refraction of swell by surface currents
title_short Refraction of swell by surface currents
title_full Refraction of swell by surface currents
title_fullStr Refraction of swell by surface currents
title_full_unstemmed Refraction of swell by surface currents
title_sort refraction of swell by surface currents
publishDate 2014
url http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1676
long_lat ENVELOPE(141.446,141.446,-66.797,-66.797)
ENVELOPE(-95.993,-95.993,55.979,55.979)
geographic Antarctic
Mirages
Munk
New Zealand
Southern Ocean
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Mirages
Munk
New Zealand
Southern Ocean
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Southern Ocean
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Southern Ocean
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1676
_version_ 1776205115043086336