Benchmarking the performance of Density Functional Theory and Point Charge Force Fields in their Description of sI Methane Hydrate against Diffusion Monte Carlo

High quality reference data from diffusion Monte Carlo calculations are presented for bulk sI methane hydrate, a complex crystal exhibiting both hydrogen-bond and dispersion dominated interactions. The performance of some commonly used exchange-correlation functionals and all-atom point charge force...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of Chemical Physics
Main Authors: Cox, Stephen J., Towler, Michael D., Alfè, Dario, Michaelides, Angelos
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Condensed Matter - Materials Science
Methane hydrate
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.6874
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4871873
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1402.6874
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1402.6874 2023-09-05T13:21:06+02:00 Benchmarking the performance of Density Functional Theory and Point Charge Force Fields in their Description of sI Methane Hydrate against Diffusion Monte Carlo Cox, Stephen J. Towler, Michael D. Alfè, Dario Michaelides, Angelos 2014-02-27 http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.6874 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4871873 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.6874 J. Chem. Phys. 140, 174703 (2014) doi:10.1063/1.4871873 Condensed Matter - Materials Science text 2014 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4871873 2023-08-16T13:16:08Z High quality reference data from diffusion Monte Carlo calculations are presented for bulk sI methane hydrate, a complex crystal exhibiting both hydrogen-bond and dispersion dominated interactions. The performance of some commonly used exchange-correlation functionals and all-atom point charge force fields is evaluated. Our results show that none of the exchange-correlation functionals tested are sufficient to describe both the energetics and the structure of methane hydrate accurately, whilst the point charge force fields perform badly in their description of the cohesive energy but fair well for the dissociation energetics. By comparing to ice Ih, we show that a good prediction of the volume and cohesive energies for the hydrate relies primarily on an accurate description of the hydrogen bonded water framework, but that to correctly predict stability of the hydrate with respect to dissociation to ice Ih and methane gas, accuracy in the water-methane interaction is also required. Our results highlight the difficulty that density functional theory faces in describing both the hydrogen bonded water framework and the dispersion bound methane. Comment: 8 pages, 4 figures, 1 table. Minor typos corrected and clarification added in Methods Text Methane hydrate ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) The Journal of Chemical Physics 140 17 174703
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Condensed Matter - Materials Science
spellingShingle Condensed Matter - Materials Science
Cox, Stephen J.
Towler, Michael D.
Alfè, Dario
Michaelides, Angelos
Benchmarking the performance of Density Functional Theory and Point Charge Force Fields in their Description of sI Methane Hydrate against Diffusion Monte Carlo
topic_facet Condensed Matter - Materials Science
description High quality reference data from diffusion Monte Carlo calculations are presented for bulk sI methane hydrate, a complex crystal exhibiting both hydrogen-bond and dispersion dominated interactions. The performance of some commonly used exchange-correlation functionals and all-atom point charge force fields is evaluated. Our results show that none of the exchange-correlation functionals tested are sufficient to describe both the energetics and the structure of methane hydrate accurately, whilst the point charge force fields perform badly in their description of the cohesive energy but fair well for the dissociation energetics. By comparing to ice Ih, we show that a good prediction of the volume and cohesive energies for the hydrate relies primarily on an accurate description of the hydrogen bonded water framework, but that to correctly predict stability of the hydrate with respect to dissociation to ice Ih and methane gas, accuracy in the water-methane interaction is also required. Our results highlight the difficulty that density functional theory faces in describing both the hydrogen bonded water framework and the dispersion bound methane. Comment: 8 pages, 4 figures, 1 table. Minor typos corrected and clarification added in Methods
format Text
author Cox, Stephen J.
Towler, Michael D.
Alfè, Dario
Michaelides, Angelos
author_facet Cox, Stephen J.
Towler, Michael D.
Alfè, Dario
Michaelides, Angelos
author_sort Cox, Stephen J.
title Benchmarking the performance of Density Functional Theory and Point Charge Force Fields in their Description of sI Methane Hydrate against Diffusion Monte Carlo
title_short Benchmarking the performance of Density Functional Theory and Point Charge Force Fields in their Description of sI Methane Hydrate against Diffusion Monte Carlo
title_full Benchmarking the performance of Density Functional Theory and Point Charge Force Fields in their Description of sI Methane Hydrate against Diffusion Monte Carlo
title_fullStr Benchmarking the performance of Density Functional Theory and Point Charge Force Fields in their Description of sI Methane Hydrate against Diffusion Monte Carlo
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking the performance of Density Functional Theory and Point Charge Force Fields in their Description of sI Methane Hydrate against Diffusion Monte Carlo
title_sort benchmarking the performance of density functional theory and point charge force fields in their description of si methane hydrate against diffusion monte carlo
publishDate 2014
url http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.6874
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4871873
genre Methane hydrate
genre_facet Methane hydrate
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.6874
J. Chem. Phys. 140, 174703 (2014)
doi:10.1063/1.4871873
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4871873
container_title The Journal of Chemical Physics
container_volume 140
container_issue 17
container_start_page 174703
_version_ 1776201716365000704

Similar Items