Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures
The signatures of UHE proton propagation through CMB are pair-production dip and GZK cutoff. The visible manifestations of these spectral features are ankle, beginning of GZK cutoff in the differential spectrum and E_{1/2} in integral spectrum. Observed in all experiments, the ankle is usually inter...
Published in: | Astroparticle Physics |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0914 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001 |
id |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1301.0914 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1301.0914 2023-09-05T13:24:00+02:00 Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures Berezinsky, V. 2013-01-05 http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0914 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0914 Astropart. Phys. 53 (2014) 120-129 doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001 Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena High Energy Physics - Phenomenology text 2013 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001 2023-08-16T12:55:04Z The signatures of UHE proton propagation through CMB are pair-production dip and GZK cutoff. The visible manifestations of these spectral features are ankle, beginning of GZK cutoff in the differential spectrum and E_{1/2} in integral spectrum. Observed in all experiments, the ankle is usually interpreted as transition from galactic to extragalactic cosmic rays. Using the mass composition measured by HiRes, Telescope Array (TA) and Auger detectors at energy (1-3) EeV, calculated anisotropy of galactic cosmic rays at these energies, and the elongation curves we strongly argue against the interpretation of the ankle given above. The transition must occur at lower energy, most probably at the second knee as the dip model predicts. The other prediction of this model, the shape of the dip, is well confirmed by HiRes, TA, AGASA and Yakutsk detectors, and, after recalibration of energies, by Auger detector. Predicted beginning of GZK cutoff and E_{1/2} agree well with HiRes and TA data. However, directly measured mass composition remains a puzzle. While HiRes and TA detectors observe the proton-dominated mass composition, as required by the dip model, the data of Auger detector strongly evidence for nuclei mass composition becoming steadily heavier at energy higher than 4 EeV and reaching Iron at energy about 35 EeV. The Auger-based scenario is consistent with another interpretation of the ankle at energy E_a=4 EeV as transition from extragalactic protons to extragalactic nuclei. The heavy- nuclei dominance at higher energies may be provided by low-energy of acceleration for protons E_{max} \sim 4 EeV and rigidity-dependent E_{max}^A =Z E_{max}$ for nuclei. The highest energy suppression may be explained as nuclei-destroying cutoff. Comment: Some changes according to the Referee report. The paper is accepted for publication in Astroparticle Physics Text Yakutsk ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Yakutsk Astroparticle Physics 53 120 129 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) |
op_collection_id |
ftarxivpreprints |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena High Energy Physics - Phenomenology |
spellingShingle |
Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena High Energy Physics - Phenomenology Berezinsky, V. Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures |
topic_facet |
Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena High Energy Physics - Phenomenology |
description |
The signatures of UHE proton propagation through CMB are pair-production dip and GZK cutoff. The visible manifestations of these spectral features are ankle, beginning of GZK cutoff in the differential spectrum and E_{1/2} in integral spectrum. Observed in all experiments, the ankle is usually interpreted as transition from galactic to extragalactic cosmic rays. Using the mass composition measured by HiRes, Telescope Array (TA) and Auger detectors at energy (1-3) EeV, calculated anisotropy of galactic cosmic rays at these energies, and the elongation curves we strongly argue against the interpretation of the ankle given above. The transition must occur at lower energy, most probably at the second knee as the dip model predicts. The other prediction of this model, the shape of the dip, is well confirmed by HiRes, TA, AGASA and Yakutsk detectors, and, after recalibration of energies, by Auger detector. Predicted beginning of GZK cutoff and E_{1/2} agree well with HiRes and TA data. However, directly measured mass composition remains a puzzle. While HiRes and TA detectors observe the proton-dominated mass composition, as required by the dip model, the data of Auger detector strongly evidence for nuclei mass composition becoming steadily heavier at energy higher than 4 EeV and reaching Iron at energy about 35 EeV. The Auger-based scenario is consistent with another interpretation of the ankle at energy E_a=4 EeV as transition from extragalactic protons to extragalactic nuclei. The heavy- nuclei dominance at higher energies may be provided by low-energy of acceleration for protons E_{max} \sim 4 EeV and rigidity-dependent E_{max}^A =Z E_{max}$ for nuclei. The highest energy suppression may be explained as nuclei-destroying cutoff. Comment: Some changes according to the Referee report. The paper is accepted for publication in Astroparticle Physics |
format |
Text |
author |
Berezinsky, V. |
author_facet |
Berezinsky, V. |
author_sort |
Berezinsky, V. |
title |
Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures |
title_short |
Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures |
title_full |
Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures |
title_fullStr |
Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures |
title_sort |
extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0914 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001 |
geographic |
Yakutsk |
geographic_facet |
Yakutsk |
genre |
Yakutsk |
genre_facet |
Yakutsk |
op_relation |
http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0914 Astropart. Phys. 53 (2014) 120-129 doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001 |
container_title |
Astroparticle Physics |
container_volume |
53 |
container_start_page |
120 |
op_container_end_page |
129 |
_version_ |
1776204569751060480 |