Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures

The signatures of UHE proton propagation through CMB are pair-production dip and GZK cutoff. The visible manifestations of these spectral features are ankle, beginning of GZK cutoff in the differential spectrum and E_{1/2} in integral spectrum. Observed in all experiments, the ankle is usually inter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Astroparticle Physics
Main Author: Berezinsky, V.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0914
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1301.0914
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1301.0914 2023-09-05T13:24:00+02:00 Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures Berezinsky, V. 2013-01-05 http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0914 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0914 Astropart. Phys. 53 (2014) 120-129 doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001 Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena High Energy Physics - Phenomenology text 2013 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001 2023-08-16T12:55:04Z The signatures of UHE proton propagation through CMB are pair-production dip and GZK cutoff. The visible manifestations of these spectral features are ankle, beginning of GZK cutoff in the differential spectrum and E_{1/2} in integral spectrum. Observed in all experiments, the ankle is usually interpreted as transition from galactic to extragalactic cosmic rays. Using the mass composition measured by HiRes, Telescope Array (TA) and Auger detectors at energy (1-3) EeV, calculated anisotropy of galactic cosmic rays at these energies, and the elongation curves we strongly argue against the interpretation of the ankle given above. The transition must occur at lower energy, most probably at the second knee as the dip model predicts. The other prediction of this model, the shape of the dip, is well confirmed by HiRes, TA, AGASA and Yakutsk detectors, and, after recalibration of energies, by Auger detector. Predicted beginning of GZK cutoff and E_{1/2} agree well with HiRes and TA data. However, directly measured mass composition remains a puzzle. While HiRes and TA detectors observe the proton-dominated mass composition, as required by the dip model, the data of Auger detector strongly evidence for nuclei mass composition becoming steadily heavier at energy higher than 4 EeV and reaching Iron at energy about 35 EeV. The Auger-based scenario is consistent with another interpretation of the ankle at energy E_a=4 EeV as transition from extragalactic protons to extragalactic nuclei. The heavy- nuclei dominance at higher energies may be provided by low-energy of acceleration for protons E_{max} \sim 4 EeV and rigidity-dependent E_{max}^A =Z E_{max}$ for nuclei. The highest energy suppression may be explained as nuclei-destroying cutoff. Comment: Some changes according to the Referee report. The paper is accepted for publication in Astroparticle Physics Text Yakutsk ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Yakutsk Astroparticle Physics 53 120 129
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
spellingShingle Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Berezinsky, V.
Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures
topic_facet Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
description The signatures of UHE proton propagation through CMB are pair-production dip and GZK cutoff. The visible manifestations of these spectral features are ankle, beginning of GZK cutoff in the differential spectrum and E_{1/2} in integral spectrum. Observed in all experiments, the ankle is usually interpreted as transition from galactic to extragalactic cosmic rays. Using the mass composition measured by HiRes, Telescope Array (TA) and Auger detectors at energy (1-3) EeV, calculated anisotropy of galactic cosmic rays at these energies, and the elongation curves we strongly argue against the interpretation of the ankle given above. The transition must occur at lower energy, most probably at the second knee as the dip model predicts. The other prediction of this model, the shape of the dip, is well confirmed by HiRes, TA, AGASA and Yakutsk detectors, and, after recalibration of energies, by Auger detector. Predicted beginning of GZK cutoff and E_{1/2} agree well with HiRes and TA data. However, directly measured mass composition remains a puzzle. While HiRes and TA detectors observe the proton-dominated mass composition, as required by the dip model, the data of Auger detector strongly evidence for nuclei mass composition becoming steadily heavier at energy higher than 4 EeV and reaching Iron at energy about 35 EeV. The Auger-based scenario is consistent with another interpretation of the ankle at energy E_a=4 EeV as transition from extragalactic protons to extragalactic nuclei. The heavy- nuclei dominance at higher energies may be provided by low-energy of acceleration for protons E_{max} \sim 4 EeV and rigidity-dependent E_{max}^A =Z E_{max}$ for nuclei. The highest energy suppression may be explained as nuclei-destroying cutoff. Comment: Some changes according to the Referee report. The paper is accepted for publication in Astroparticle Physics
format Text
author Berezinsky, V.
author_facet Berezinsky, V.
author_sort Berezinsky, V.
title Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures
title_short Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures
title_full Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures
title_fullStr Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures
title_full_unstemmed Extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures
title_sort extragalactic cosmic rays and their signatures
publishDate 2013
url http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0914
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001
geographic Yakutsk
geographic_facet Yakutsk
genre Yakutsk
genre_facet Yakutsk
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0914
Astropart. Phys. 53 (2014) 120-129
doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.001
container_title Astroparticle Physics
container_volume 53
container_start_page 120
op_container_end_page 129
_version_ 1776204569751060480