Microwave emissivity of fresh water ice--Lake ice and Antarctic ice pack--Radiative transfer simulations versus satellite radiances

Microwave emissivity models of sea ice are poorly validated empirically. Typical validation studies involve using averaged or stereotyped profiles of ice parameters against averaged radiance measurements. Measurement sites are rarely matched and even less often point-by-point. Because of saline cont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mills, Peter
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4095
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1202.4095
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1202.4095 2023-09-05T13:14:24+02:00 Microwave emissivity of fresh water ice--Lake ice and Antarctic ice pack--Radiative transfer simulations versus satellite radiances Mills, Peter 2012-02-18 http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4095 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4095 Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics text 2012 ftarxivpreprints 2023-08-16T12:39:54Z Microwave emissivity models of sea ice are poorly validated empirically. Typical validation studies involve using averaged or stereotyped profiles of ice parameters against averaged radiance measurements. Measurement sites are rarely matched and even less often point-by-point. Because of saline content, complex permittivity of sea ice is highly variable and difficult to predict. Therefore, to check the validity of a typical, plane-parallel, radiative-transfer-based ice emissivity model, we apply it to fresh water ice instead of salt-water ice. Radiance simulations for lake ice are compared with measurements over Lake Superior from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on EOS (AMSR-E). AMSR-E measurements are also collected over Antarctic icepack. For each pixel, a thermodynamic model is driven by four years of European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis data and the resulting temperature profiles used to drive the emissivity model. The results suggest that the relatively simple emissivity model is a good fit to the data. Both cases, however, show large discrepencies whose most likely explanation is scattering both within the ice sheet as well as by cloudy atmospheres. Scattering is neglected by the model. Further work is needed to refine the scattering component of ice emissivity models and to generate accurate estimates of complex permittivities within sea ice. Comment: Made some minor corrections Text Antarc* Antarctic ice pack Ice Sheet Sea ice ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
spellingShingle Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
Mills, Peter
Microwave emissivity of fresh water ice--Lake ice and Antarctic ice pack--Radiative transfer simulations versus satellite radiances
topic_facet Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
description Microwave emissivity models of sea ice are poorly validated empirically. Typical validation studies involve using averaged or stereotyped profiles of ice parameters against averaged radiance measurements. Measurement sites are rarely matched and even less often point-by-point. Because of saline content, complex permittivity of sea ice is highly variable and difficult to predict. Therefore, to check the validity of a typical, plane-parallel, radiative-transfer-based ice emissivity model, we apply it to fresh water ice instead of salt-water ice. Radiance simulations for lake ice are compared with measurements over Lake Superior from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on EOS (AMSR-E). AMSR-E measurements are also collected over Antarctic icepack. For each pixel, a thermodynamic model is driven by four years of European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis data and the resulting temperature profiles used to drive the emissivity model. The results suggest that the relatively simple emissivity model is a good fit to the data. Both cases, however, show large discrepencies whose most likely explanation is scattering both within the ice sheet as well as by cloudy atmospheres. Scattering is neglected by the model. Further work is needed to refine the scattering component of ice emissivity models and to generate accurate estimates of complex permittivities within sea ice. Comment: Made some minor corrections
format Text
author Mills, Peter
author_facet Mills, Peter
author_sort Mills, Peter
title Microwave emissivity of fresh water ice--Lake ice and Antarctic ice pack--Radiative transfer simulations versus satellite radiances
title_short Microwave emissivity of fresh water ice--Lake ice and Antarctic ice pack--Radiative transfer simulations versus satellite radiances
title_full Microwave emissivity of fresh water ice--Lake ice and Antarctic ice pack--Radiative transfer simulations versus satellite radiances
title_fullStr Microwave emissivity of fresh water ice--Lake ice and Antarctic ice pack--Radiative transfer simulations versus satellite radiances
title_full_unstemmed Microwave emissivity of fresh water ice--Lake ice and Antarctic ice pack--Radiative transfer simulations versus satellite radiances
title_sort microwave emissivity of fresh water ice--lake ice and antarctic ice pack--radiative transfer simulations versus satellite radiances
publishDate 2012
url http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4095
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
ice pack
Ice Sheet
Sea ice
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
ice pack
Ice Sheet
Sea ice
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4095
_version_ 1776205369801965568