Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
We present scanning SQUID microscopy data on the superconductors Sr2RuO4 (Tc = 1.5 K) and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ (Tc = 1.8 K). In both of these materials, superconductivity-related time-reversal symmetry-breaking fields have been observed by muon spin rotation; our aim was to visualize the structure of t...
Published in: | Physical Review B |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2189 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501 |
id |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1003.2189 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1003.2189 2023-09-05T13:20:42+02:00 Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy Hicks, Clifford W. Kirtley, John R. Lippman, Thomas M. Koshnick, Nicholas C. Huber, Martin E. Maeno, Yoshiteru Yuhasz, William M. Maple, M. Brian Moler, Kathryn A. 2010-03-10 http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2189 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2189 Phys. Rev. B vol. 81 214501 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501 Condensed Matter - Superconductivity text 2010 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501 2023-08-16T12:11:34Z We present scanning SQUID microscopy data on the superconductors Sr2RuO4 (Tc = 1.5 K) and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ (Tc = 1.8 K). In both of these materials, superconductivity-related time-reversal symmetry-breaking fields have been observed by muon spin rotation; our aim was to visualize the structure of these fields. However in neither Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ nor PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ do we observe spontaneous superconductivity-related magnetization. In Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, many experimental results have been interpreted on the basis of a $px \pm ipy$ superconducting order parameter. This order parameter is expected to give spontaneous magnetic induction at sample edges and order parameter domain walls. Supposing large domains, our data restrict domain wall and edge fields to no more than ~0.1% and ~0.2% of the expected magnitude, respectively. Alternatively, if the magnetization is of the expected order, the typical domain size is limited to ~30 nm for random domains, or ~500 nm for periodic domains. Comment: 8 pages, 7 figures. Submitted to Phys. Rev. B Text IPY ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Physical Review B 81 21 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) |
op_collection_id |
ftarxivpreprints |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Condensed Matter - Superconductivity |
spellingShingle |
Condensed Matter - Superconductivity Hicks, Clifford W. Kirtley, John R. Lippman, Thomas M. Koshnick, Nicholas C. Huber, Martin E. Maeno, Yoshiteru Yuhasz, William M. Maple, M. Brian Moler, Kathryn A. Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy |
topic_facet |
Condensed Matter - Superconductivity |
description |
We present scanning SQUID microscopy data on the superconductors Sr2RuO4 (Tc = 1.5 K) and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ (Tc = 1.8 K). In both of these materials, superconductivity-related time-reversal symmetry-breaking fields have been observed by muon spin rotation; our aim was to visualize the structure of these fields. However in neither Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ nor PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ do we observe spontaneous superconductivity-related magnetization. In Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, many experimental results have been interpreted on the basis of a $px \pm ipy$ superconducting order parameter. This order parameter is expected to give spontaneous magnetic induction at sample edges and order parameter domain walls. Supposing large domains, our data restrict domain wall and edge fields to no more than ~0.1% and ~0.2% of the expected magnitude, respectively. Alternatively, if the magnetization is of the expected order, the typical domain size is limited to ~30 nm for random domains, or ~500 nm for periodic domains. Comment: 8 pages, 7 figures. Submitted to Phys. Rev. B |
format |
Text |
author |
Hicks, Clifford W. Kirtley, John R. Lippman, Thomas M. Koshnick, Nicholas C. Huber, Martin E. Maeno, Yoshiteru Yuhasz, William M. Maple, M. Brian Moler, Kathryn A. |
author_facet |
Hicks, Clifford W. Kirtley, John R. Lippman, Thomas M. Koshnick, Nicholas C. Huber, Martin E. Maeno, Yoshiteru Yuhasz, William M. Maple, M. Brian Moler, Kathryn A. |
author_sort |
Hicks, Clifford W. |
title |
Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy |
title_short |
Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy |
title_full |
Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy |
title_fullStr |
Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy |
title_sort |
limits on superconductivity-related magnetization in sr$_2$ruo$_4$ and pros$_4$sb$_{12}$ from scanning squid microscopy |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2189 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501 |
genre |
IPY |
genre_facet |
IPY |
op_relation |
http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2189 Phys. Rev. B vol. 81 214501 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501 |
container_title |
Physical Review B |
container_volume |
81 |
container_issue |
21 |
_version_ |
1776201337330991104 |