Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy

We present scanning SQUID microscopy data on the superconductors Sr2RuO4 (Tc = 1.5 K) and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ (Tc = 1.8 K). In both of these materials, superconductivity-related time-reversal symmetry-breaking fields have been observed by muon spin rotation; our aim was to visualize the structure of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical Review B
Main Authors: Hicks, Clifford W., Kirtley, John R., Lippman, Thomas M., Koshnick, Nicholas C., Huber, Martin E., Maeno, Yoshiteru, Yuhasz, William M., Maple, M. Brian, Moler, Kathryn A.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2010
Subjects:
IPY
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2189
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501
id ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1003.2189
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarxivpreprints:oai:arXiv.org:1003.2189 2023-09-05T13:20:42+02:00 Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy Hicks, Clifford W. Kirtley, John R. Lippman, Thomas M. Koshnick, Nicholas C. Huber, Martin E. Maeno, Yoshiteru Yuhasz, William M. Maple, M. Brian Moler, Kathryn A. 2010-03-10 http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2189 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501 unknown http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2189 Phys. Rev. B vol. 81 214501 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501 Condensed Matter - Superconductivity text 2010 ftarxivpreprints https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501 2023-08-16T12:11:34Z We present scanning SQUID microscopy data on the superconductors Sr2RuO4 (Tc = 1.5 K) and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ (Tc = 1.8 K). In both of these materials, superconductivity-related time-reversal symmetry-breaking fields have been observed by muon spin rotation; our aim was to visualize the structure of these fields. However in neither Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ nor PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ do we observe spontaneous superconductivity-related magnetization. In Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, many experimental results have been interpreted on the basis of a $px \pm ipy$ superconducting order parameter. This order parameter is expected to give spontaneous magnetic induction at sample edges and order parameter domain walls. Supposing large domains, our data restrict domain wall and edge fields to no more than ~0.1% and ~0.2% of the expected magnitude, respectively. Alternatively, if the magnetization is of the expected order, the typical domain size is limited to ~30 nm for random domains, or ~500 nm for periodic domains. Comment: 8 pages, 7 figures. Submitted to Phys. Rev. B Text IPY ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library) Physical Review B 81 21
institution Open Polar
collection ArXiv.org (Cornell University Library)
op_collection_id ftarxivpreprints
language unknown
topic Condensed Matter - Superconductivity
spellingShingle Condensed Matter - Superconductivity
Hicks, Clifford W.
Kirtley, John R.
Lippman, Thomas M.
Koshnick, Nicholas C.
Huber, Martin E.
Maeno, Yoshiteru
Yuhasz, William M.
Maple, M. Brian
Moler, Kathryn A.
Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
topic_facet Condensed Matter - Superconductivity
description We present scanning SQUID microscopy data on the superconductors Sr2RuO4 (Tc = 1.5 K) and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ (Tc = 1.8 K). In both of these materials, superconductivity-related time-reversal symmetry-breaking fields have been observed by muon spin rotation; our aim was to visualize the structure of these fields. However in neither Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ nor PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ do we observe spontaneous superconductivity-related magnetization. In Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, many experimental results have been interpreted on the basis of a $px \pm ipy$ superconducting order parameter. This order parameter is expected to give spontaneous magnetic induction at sample edges and order parameter domain walls. Supposing large domains, our data restrict domain wall and edge fields to no more than ~0.1% and ~0.2% of the expected magnitude, respectively. Alternatively, if the magnetization is of the expected order, the typical domain size is limited to ~30 nm for random domains, or ~500 nm for periodic domains. Comment: 8 pages, 7 figures. Submitted to Phys. Rev. B
format Text
author Hicks, Clifford W.
Kirtley, John R.
Lippman, Thomas M.
Koshnick, Nicholas C.
Huber, Martin E.
Maeno, Yoshiteru
Yuhasz, William M.
Maple, M. Brian
Moler, Kathryn A.
author_facet Hicks, Clifford W.
Kirtley, John R.
Lippman, Thomas M.
Koshnick, Nicholas C.
Huber, Martin E.
Maeno, Yoshiteru
Yuhasz, William M.
Maple, M. Brian
Moler, Kathryn A.
author_sort Hicks, Clifford W.
title Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
title_short Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
title_full Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
title_fullStr Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
title_full_unstemmed Limits on Superconductivity-Related Magnetization in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$ from Scanning SQUID Microscopy
title_sort limits on superconductivity-related magnetization in sr$_2$ruo$_4$ and pros$_4$sb$_{12}$ from scanning squid microscopy
publishDate 2010
url http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2189
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501
genre IPY
genre_facet IPY
op_relation http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2189
Phys. Rev. B vol. 81 214501 (2010)
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501
container_title Physical Review B
container_volume 81
container_issue 21
_version_ 1776201337330991104