Totemic Landscapes and Vanishing Cultures Through the Eyes of Wolfgang Paalen and Kurt Seligmann

abstract: The Surrealists established the importance of Oceanic and North American Indian Art – mainly Inuit, Northwest Coast and Southwest – in the 1920s. While Max Ernst and André Breton traveled through the Southwest in the 1940s, during their American exile, two members of the Surrealist circle,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Mauzé, Marie (Author)
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.17505
id ftarizonastateun:item:17505
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarizonastateun:item:17505 2023-05-15T16:55:15+02:00 Totemic Landscapes and Vanishing Cultures Through the Eyes of Wolfgang Paalen and Kurt Seligmann Mauzé, Marie (Author) 2008 24 Pages http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.17505 eng eng Journal of Surrealism of the Americas, VOL 2, NO 1 (2008) http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.17505 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 CC-BY-NC-ND Text Peer-reviewed 2008 ftarizonastateun 2019-06-22T22:51:12Z abstract: The Surrealists established the importance of Oceanic and North American Indian Art – mainly Inuit, Northwest Coast and Southwest – in the 1920s. While Max Ernst and André Breton traveled through the Southwest in the 1940s, during their American exile, two members of the Surrealist circle, the Swiss painter Kurt Seligmann (1900-1962), and the Austrian-born artist Wolfgang Paalen (1905-1959) visited the Northwest Coast, respectively in 1938 and 1939. Both not only showed a strong interest in collecting artifacts but were also fascinated by Native American mythology and art, and their relationship to totemic thought. While the Surrealists did not leave a large body of publications explaining their relationship to Northwest Coast art and culture, the various documents left by Seligmann and Paalen allow us to delimit three implicit themes in their work as described below. This paper focuses on their writings, published and unpublished, and their photographic documentation as well as their own collections of artifacts. It examines from an anthropological perspective their visions of Northwest Coast art and cultures, which undoubtedly contributed to the development of their sensitivity to the outside world. In that framework, their scholarly contribution and treatment of ethnological data appear independent from their artistic practices. Two distinct figures come to light: Seligmann as an ethnographer in contrast to Paalen as a theorist. While they may differ in their conception of totemic landscapes, they share a common view on the future of the Northwest Coast cultures. Text inuit Arizona State University: ASU Digital Repository Indian
institution Open Polar
collection Arizona State University: ASU Digital Repository
op_collection_id ftarizonastateun
language English
description abstract: The Surrealists established the importance of Oceanic and North American Indian Art – mainly Inuit, Northwest Coast and Southwest – in the 1920s. While Max Ernst and André Breton traveled through the Southwest in the 1940s, during their American exile, two members of the Surrealist circle, the Swiss painter Kurt Seligmann (1900-1962), and the Austrian-born artist Wolfgang Paalen (1905-1959) visited the Northwest Coast, respectively in 1938 and 1939. Both not only showed a strong interest in collecting artifacts but were also fascinated by Native American mythology and art, and their relationship to totemic thought. While the Surrealists did not leave a large body of publications explaining their relationship to Northwest Coast art and culture, the various documents left by Seligmann and Paalen allow us to delimit three implicit themes in their work as described below. This paper focuses on their writings, published and unpublished, and their photographic documentation as well as their own collections of artifacts. It examines from an anthropological perspective their visions of Northwest Coast art and cultures, which undoubtedly contributed to the development of their sensitivity to the outside world. In that framework, their scholarly contribution and treatment of ethnological data appear independent from their artistic practices. Two distinct figures come to light: Seligmann as an ethnographer in contrast to Paalen as a theorist. While they may differ in their conception of totemic landscapes, they share a common view on the future of the Northwest Coast cultures.
author2 Mauzé, Marie (Author)
format Text
title Totemic Landscapes and Vanishing Cultures Through the Eyes of Wolfgang Paalen and Kurt Seligmann
spellingShingle Totemic Landscapes and Vanishing Cultures Through the Eyes of Wolfgang Paalen and Kurt Seligmann
title_short Totemic Landscapes and Vanishing Cultures Through the Eyes of Wolfgang Paalen and Kurt Seligmann
title_full Totemic Landscapes and Vanishing Cultures Through the Eyes of Wolfgang Paalen and Kurt Seligmann
title_fullStr Totemic Landscapes and Vanishing Cultures Through the Eyes of Wolfgang Paalen and Kurt Seligmann
title_full_unstemmed Totemic Landscapes and Vanishing Cultures Through the Eyes of Wolfgang Paalen and Kurt Seligmann
title_sort totemic landscapes and vanishing cultures through the eyes of wolfgang paalen and kurt seligmann
publishDate 2008
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.17505
geographic Indian
geographic_facet Indian
genre inuit
genre_facet inuit
op_relation Journal of Surrealism of the Americas, VOL 2, NO 1 (2008)
http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.17505
op_rights http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
_version_ 1766046226452578304