Characteristics of Sq Variation of Geomagnetic Field at the Great Wall Station, Antarctica in Winter

In this paper the characteristics of Sq variation of geomagnetic field in the region of the Chinese Great Wall Station (CGWS), Antarctica, in winter are analyzed from geomagnetic data obtained at the Geomagnetic Observatory of CGWS. The result enables us to reveal the following aspects: (1) The patt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Changfa, Liu, Ping, Zhang, Chengmin, Jiao
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Polar Research Institute of China - PRIC 1991
Subjects:
Online Access:http://library.arcticportal.org/2030/
http://library.arcticportal.org/2030/1/A19910107.pdf
id ftarcticportal:oai:generic.eprints.org:2030
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarcticportal:oai:generic.eprints.org:2030 2023-05-15T13:05:26+02:00 Characteristics of Sq Variation of Geomagnetic Field at the Great Wall Station, Antarctica in Winter Changfa, Liu Ping, Zhang Chengmin, Jiao 1991-06 application/pdf http://library.arcticportal.org/2030/ http://library.arcticportal.org/2030/1/A19910107.pdf en eng Polar Research Institute of China - PRIC http://library.arcticportal.org/2030/1/A19910107.pdf Changfa, Liu and Ping, Zhang and Chengmin, Jiao (1991) Characteristics of Sq Variation of Geomagnetic Field at the Great Wall Station, Antarctica in Winter. Advances in Polar Science, 2 (1). pp. 53-59. Article PeerReviewed 1991 ftarcticportal 2023-04-05T22:52:04Z In this paper the characteristics of Sq variation of geomagnetic field in the region of the Chinese Great Wall Station (CGWS), Antarctica, in winter are analyzed from geomagnetic data obtained at the Geomagnetic Observatory of CGWS. The result enables us to reveal the following aspects: (1) The pattern of Sq variation at CGWS in early (Apr.) and Late winter (Sep.) is similar to that at Beijing Geomagnetic Observatory (BJO) at the middle latitude in the Northern Hemisphere. It may be controlled by the midlatitudinal ionospheric dynamo current. Amplitude of Sq variation is very small, and the harmonics in 8 hours or shorter periods in midwinter (June and July) is predominant because of the decreased effect of solar ultraviolet radiation and the dominant geomagnetic disturbance at high latitudes. (2) The vectors of Sq-equivalent current in the daytime (08 - 15h) and counterclockwise in the night in early and late winter. Both of the vectors are very small because of the effect of the current density in the ionosphere is relatively weak in midwinter. The direction of vectors of Sq-equivalent current at CGWS in early and late winter in different from that in midwinter. It may be affected by the ionospheric current and field-aligned current in the polar region. Article in Journal/Newspaper Advances in Polar Science Antarc* Antarctica Polar Science Polar Science Arctic Portal Library Great Wall Station ENVELOPE(-58.970,-58.970,-62.217,-62.217) Midwinter ENVELOPE(139.931,139.931,-66.690,-66.690)
institution Open Polar
collection Arctic Portal Library
op_collection_id ftarcticportal
language English
description In this paper the characteristics of Sq variation of geomagnetic field in the region of the Chinese Great Wall Station (CGWS), Antarctica, in winter are analyzed from geomagnetic data obtained at the Geomagnetic Observatory of CGWS. The result enables us to reveal the following aspects: (1) The pattern of Sq variation at CGWS in early (Apr.) and Late winter (Sep.) is similar to that at Beijing Geomagnetic Observatory (BJO) at the middle latitude in the Northern Hemisphere. It may be controlled by the midlatitudinal ionospheric dynamo current. Amplitude of Sq variation is very small, and the harmonics in 8 hours or shorter periods in midwinter (June and July) is predominant because of the decreased effect of solar ultraviolet radiation and the dominant geomagnetic disturbance at high latitudes. (2) The vectors of Sq-equivalent current in the daytime (08 - 15h) and counterclockwise in the night in early and late winter. Both of the vectors are very small because of the effect of the current density in the ionosphere is relatively weak in midwinter. The direction of vectors of Sq-equivalent current at CGWS in early and late winter in different from that in midwinter. It may be affected by the ionospheric current and field-aligned current in the polar region.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Changfa, Liu
Ping, Zhang
Chengmin, Jiao
spellingShingle Changfa, Liu
Ping, Zhang
Chengmin, Jiao
Characteristics of Sq Variation of Geomagnetic Field at the Great Wall Station, Antarctica in Winter
author_facet Changfa, Liu
Ping, Zhang
Chengmin, Jiao
author_sort Changfa, Liu
title Characteristics of Sq Variation of Geomagnetic Field at the Great Wall Station, Antarctica in Winter
title_short Characteristics of Sq Variation of Geomagnetic Field at the Great Wall Station, Antarctica in Winter
title_full Characteristics of Sq Variation of Geomagnetic Field at the Great Wall Station, Antarctica in Winter
title_fullStr Characteristics of Sq Variation of Geomagnetic Field at the Great Wall Station, Antarctica in Winter
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of Sq Variation of Geomagnetic Field at the Great Wall Station, Antarctica in Winter
title_sort characteristics of sq variation of geomagnetic field at the great wall station, antarctica in winter
publisher Polar Research Institute of China - PRIC
publishDate 1991
url http://library.arcticportal.org/2030/
http://library.arcticportal.org/2030/1/A19910107.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(-58.970,-58.970,-62.217,-62.217)
ENVELOPE(139.931,139.931,-66.690,-66.690)
geographic Great Wall Station
Midwinter
geographic_facet Great Wall Station
Midwinter
genre Advances in Polar Science
Antarc*
Antarctica
Polar Science
Polar Science
genre_facet Advances in Polar Science
Antarc*
Antarctica
Polar Science
Polar Science
op_relation http://library.arcticportal.org/2030/1/A19910107.pdf
Changfa, Liu and Ping, Zhang and Chengmin, Jiao (1991) Characteristics of Sq Variation of Geomagnetic Field at the Great Wall Station, Antarctica in Winter. Advances in Polar Science, 2 (1). pp. 53-59.
_version_ 1766383073498234880