Assessment of Cultural Heritage Monuments and Sites in the Arctic

The project aimed at presenting a short list of 20-30 cultural heritage sites in the Arctic which are of particular international importance. While each Arctic nation already has a process for ranking and a management strategy for its own national sites, the project aim was to identify sites that ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: Arctic Council's Sustainable Development Working Group 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11374/50
id ftarcticcouncil:oai:oaarchive.arctic-council.org:11374/50
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarcticcouncil:oai:oaarchive.arctic-council.org:11374/50 2023-05-15T14:48:18+02:00 Assessment of Cultural Heritage Monuments and Sites in the Arctic 2013 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11374/50 en eng Arctic Council's Sustainable Development Working Group http://hdl.handle.net/11374/50 SDWG Cultural heritage sites Summary Report 2013 ftarcticcouncil 2022-12-19T09:42:49Z The project aimed at presenting a short list of 20-30 cultural heritage sites in the Arctic which are of particular international importance. While each Arctic nation already has a process for ranking and a management strategy for its own national sites, the project aim was to identify sites that have significance which transcends national boundaries. It was not a criterion that the final list should contain an equal number of sites from each country or region, or even a minimum of one from each country or region. It is the international criteria which decided the listed sites, while “non-listed” sites of course may retain their national importance and designations. This same principle is reflected in the World Heritage List which, although it ideally may seek equal representation from all nations and themes, will not accept nominations solely to fill these criteria. A larger number of heritage sites was originally proposed and formed the basis for the selection of the few proposed here. Before nominations to the list could be initiated, it was necessary to develop a set of criteria for the designation of sites in the Arctic in order to clarify the international significance. These criteria are presented in this report. In addition the project aimed to present a Statement of Best Practice for the protection and preservation of these designated sites along the lines of the World Heritage standard for the protection and management of WH Sites. The Statement is presented in this report and it is hoped that the principles stated there will contribute towards ensuring excellent management of the listed sites and of other important sites not on the list. Arctic Council's Sustainable Development Working Group Other/Unknown Material Arctic Arctic Council Repository Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Arctic Council Repository
op_collection_id ftarcticcouncil
language English
topic SDWG
Cultural heritage sites
spellingShingle SDWG
Cultural heritage sites
Assessment of Cultural Heritage Monuments and Sites in the Arctic
topic_facet SDWG
Cultural heritage sites
description The project aimed at presenting a short list of 20-30 cultural heritage sites in the Arctic which are of particular international importance. While each Arctic nation already has a process for ranking and a management strategy for its own national sites, the project aim was to identify sites that have significance which transcends national boundaries. It was not a criterion that the final list should contain an equal number of sites from each country or region, or even a minimum of one from each country or region. It is the international criteria which decided the listed sites, while “non-listed” sites of course may retain their national importance and designations. This same principle is reflected in the World Heritage List which, although it ideally may seek equal representation from all nations and themes, will not accept nominations solely to fill these criteria. A larger number of heritage sites was originally proposed and formed the basis for the selection of the few proposed here. Before nominations to the list could be initiated, it was necessary to develop a set of criteria for the designation of sites in the Arctic in order to clarify the international significance. These criteria are presented in this report. In addition the project aimed to present a Statement of Best Practice for the protection and preservation of these designated sites along the lines of the World Heritage standard for the protection and management of WH Sites. The Statement is presented in this report and it is hoped that the principles stated there will contribute towards ensuring excellent management of the listed sites and of other important sites not on the list. Arctic Council's Sustainable Development Working Group
format Other/Unknown Material
title Assessment of Cultural Heritage Monuments and Sites in the Arctic
title_short Assessment of Cultural Heritage Monuments and Sites in the Arctic
title_full Assessment of Cultural Heritage Monuments and Sites in the Arctic
title_fullStr Assessment of Cultural Heritage Monuments and Sites in the Arctic
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Cultural Heritage Monuments and Sites in the Arctic
title_sort assessment of cultural heritage monuments and sites in the arctic
publisher Arctic Council's Sustainable Development Working Group
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/11374/50
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/11374/50
_version_ 1766319395430203392