Gap Analysis in Support of CPAN: The Russian Arctic

The present Gap Analysis for the Russian Arctic was undertaken in response to the CPAN Strategy and Action Plan requirement for countries to identify gaps in protected area coverage of ecosystems and species and to select sites for further action. Another important objective was to update the Russia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lysenko, Igor, Henry, David
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11374/166
id ftarcticcouncil:oai:oaarchive.arctic-council.org:11374/166
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarcticcouncil:oai:oaarchive.arctic-council.org:11374/166 2023-05-15T14:36:26+02:00 Gap Analysis in Support of CPAN: The Russian Arctic Lysenko, Igor Henry, David 2000 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11374/166 en eng Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) CAFF Habitat Conservation Report;No. 9 http://hdl.handle.net/11374/166 CAFF Circumpolar protected areas network Russian Federation UNEP Species protection Summary Report 2000 ftarcticcouncil 2022-12-19T09:49:01Z The present Gap Analysis for the Russian Arctic was undertaken in response to the CPAN Strategy and Action Plan requirement for countries to identify gaps in protected area coverage of ecosystems and species and to select sites for further action. Another important objective was to update the Russian data base. The Analysis used a system of twelve landscape units instead of the previously used vegetation zone system as the basis to classify Russia's ecosystems. A comparison of the terrestrial landscape systems against protected area coverage indicates that 27% of the glacier ecosystem is protected, 9.3% of the tundra (treeless portion) and 4.7% of the forest systems within the Arctic boundaries are under protection, but the most important Arctic forested areas have only 0.1% protection. In general, the analysis indicates a negative relationship between ecosystem productivity and protection, which is consistent with findings in 1996. Overall the Analysis points to an increase in protection of Russia's Arctic from 3.5% in 1996 to 7.5% in 1999. However, it does not answer a question posed by the CPAN Strategy and Action Plan of whether or not all of the Russian Arctic ecosystems are represented in the protected area system "as fully as possible". Other/Unknown Material Arctic CAFF Tundra Arctic Council Repository Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Arctic Council Repository
op_collection_id ftarcticcouncil
language English
topic CAFF
Circumpolar protected areas network
Russian Federation
UNEP
Species protection
spellingShingle CAFF
Circumpolar protected areas network
Russian Federation
UNEP
Species protection
Lysenko, Igor
Henry, David
Gap Analysis in Support of CPAN: The Russian Arctic
topic_facet CAFF
Circumpolar protected areas network
Russian Federation
UNEP
Species protection
description The present Gap Analysis for the Russian Arctic was undertaken in response to the CPAN Strategy and Action Plan requirement for countries to identify gaps in protected area coverage of ecosystems and species and to select sites for further action. Another important objective was to update the Russian data base. The Analysis used a system of twelve landscape units instead of the previously used vegetation zone system as the basis to classify Russia's ecosystems. A comparison of the terrestrial landscape systems against protected area coverage indicates that 27% of the glacier ecosystem is protected, 9.3% of the tundra (treeless portion) and 4.7% of the forest systems within the Arctic boundaries are under protection, but the most important Arctic forested areas have only 0.1% protection. In general, the analysis indicates a negative relationship between ecosystem productivity and protection, which is consistent with findings in 1996. Overall the Analysis points to an increase in protection of Russia's Arctic from 3.5% in 1996 to 7.5% in 1999. However, it does not answer a question posed by the CPAN Strategy and Action Plan of whether or not all of the Russian Arctic ecosystems are represented in the protected area system "as fully as possible".
format Other/Unknown Material
author Lysenko, Igor
Henry, David
author_facet Lysenko, Igor
Henry, David
author_sort Lysenko, Igor
title Gap Analysis in Support of CPAN: The Russian Arctic
title_short Gap Analysis in Support of CPAN: The Russian Arctic
title_full Gap Analysis in Support of CPAN: The Russian Arctic
title_fullStr Gap Analysis in Support of CPAN: The Russian Arctic
title_full_unstemmed Gap Analysis in Support of CPAN: The Russian Arctic
title_sort gap analysis in support of cpan: the russian arctic
publisher Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF)
publishDate 2000
url http://hdl.handle.net/11374/166
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
CAFF
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
CAFF
Tundra
op_relation CAFF Habitat Conservation Report;No. 9
http://hdl.handle.net/11374/166
_version_ 1766309048110546944