Antarctica at Risk: Geostrategic Manoeuvring and the Future of the Antarctic Treaty System

The Antarctic is becoming a zone of contested governance. Leveraging open-source literature and a tabletop exercise (TTX), the authors examine the possible implications that geostrategic manoeuvring and competition in the Antarctic in the coming decades might have on the longevity and resilience of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Black, Marigold, Sacks, Benjamin J., Dortmans, Peter, Yeung, Jade, Savitz, Scott, Stephenson, Scott R., Tingstad, Abbie, Pezard, Stéphanie, Jouan, Nicolas, Black, James
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00842/95420/103211.pdf
https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA2465-1
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00842/95420/
id ftarchimer:oai:archimer.ifremer.fr:95420
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarchimer:oai:archimer.ifremer.fr:95420 2023-09-05T13:13:46+02:00 Antarctica at Risk: Geostrategic Manoeuvring and the Future of the Antarctic Treaty System Black, Marigold Sacks, Benjamin J. Dortmans, Peter Yeung, Jade Savitz, Scott Stephenson, Scott R. Tingstad, Abbie Pezard, Stéphanie Jouan, Nicolas Black, James 2023 application/pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00842/95420/103211.pdf https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA2465-1 https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00842/95420/ eng eng https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00842/95420/103211.pdf doi:10.7249/RRA2465-1 https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00842/95420/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess restricted use text Book / Conference proceedings info:eu-repo/semantics/book 2023 ftarchimer https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA2465-1 2023-08-22T22:51:07Z The Antarctic is becoming a zone of contested governance. Leveraging open-source literature and a tabletop exercise (TTX), the authors examine the possible implications that geostrategic manoeuvring and competition in the Antarctic in the coming decades might have on the longevity and resilience of the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS), a governance regime that seems increasingly ill-fitted to modern strategic dynamics. The authors develop a portrait of the Antarctic as a potential point of geostrategic tension by conducting a review of the history of the ATS, highlighting existing challenges with governance, and setting the stage for possible friction points between nations. The authors explore the interested parties, the nature of their interests and their existing positions as reflected in their policies and activities. This analysis was used to design and develop a TTX that challenged, tested and stretched thinking and identified potential geostrategic friction points for the Antarctic. The authors provide empirically driven projections of future dynamics to expose uncertainty, expand understanding and provide a stronger basis for policy and decisionmaking for the region. Key Findings Without an agreed-upon and effective enforcement mechanism, the ATS will be rendered redundant if, and when, some interested parties seek to challenge it to further their own interests. The territorial distribution of the Antarctic region might be unsustainable because it is reflective of the power dynamics of the post–World War II era. The premise underpinning the ATS will be called into question if other claimants actively challenge the territorial distribution. States are very likely to exploit resources, both on land and in the seas around the Antarctic, to undermine the ATS. The Antarctic has several characteristics that are not typically present for land-based conflict, which makes it more difficult to understand how and why conflict could occur: It is resource-rich but supply-poor, it is extremely remote, its natural ... Book Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Archimer (Archive Institutionnelle de l'Ifremer - Institut français de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer) Antarctic The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection Archimer (Archive Institutionnelle de l'Ifremer - Institut français de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer)
op_collection_id ftarchimer
language English
description The Antarctic is becoming a zone of contested governance. Leveraging open-source literature and a tabletop exercise (TTX), the authors examine the possible implications that geostrategic manoeuvring and competition in the Antarctic in the coming decades might have on the longevity and resilience of the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS), a governance regime that seems increasingly ill-fitted to modern strategic dynamics. The authors develop a portrait of the Antarctic as a potential point of geostrategic tension by conducting a review of the history of the ATS, highlighting existing challenges with governance, and setting the stage for possible friction points between nations. The authors explore the interested parties, the nature of their interests and their existing positions as reflected in their policies and activities. This analysis was used to design and develop a TTX that challenged, tested and stretched thinking and identified potential geostrategic friction points for the Antarctic. The authors provide empirically driven projections of future dynamics to expose uncertainty, expand understanding and provide a stronger basis for policy and decisionmaking for the region. Key Findings Without an agreed-upon and effective enforcement mechanism, the ATS will be rendered redundant if, and when, some interested parties seek to challenge it to further their own interests. The territorial distribution of the Antarctic region might be unsustainable because it is reflective of the power dynamics of the post–World War II era. The premise underpinning the ATS will be called into question if other claimants actively challenge the territorial distribution. States are very likely to exploit resources, both on land and in the seas around the Antarctic, to undermine the ATS. The Antarctic has several characteristics that are not typically present for land-based conflict, which makes it more difficult to understand how and why conflict could occur: It is resource-rich but supply-poor, it is extremely remote, its natural ...
format Book
author Black, Marigold
Sacks, Benjamin J.
Dortmans, Peter
Yeung, Jade
Savitz, Scott
Stephenson, Scott R.
Tingstad, Abbie
Pezard, Stéphanie
Jouan, Nicolas
Black, James
spellingShingle Black, Marigold
Sacks, Benjamin J.
Dortmans, Peter
Yeung, Jade
Savitz, Scott
Stephenson, Scott R.
Tingstad, Abbie
Pezard, Stéphanie
Jouan, Nicolas
Black, James
Antarctica at Risk: Geostrategic Manoeuvring and the Future of the Antarctic Treaty System
author_facet Black, Marigold
Sacks, Benjamin J.
Dortmans, Peter
Yeung, Jade
Savitz, Scott
Stephenson, Scott R.
Tingstad, Abbie
Pezard, Stéphanie
Jouan, Nicolas
Black, James
author_sort Black, Marigold
title Antarctica at Risk: Geostrategic Manoeuvring and the Future of the Antarctic Treaty System
title_short Antarctica at Risk: Geostrategic Manoeuvring and the Future of the Antarctic Treaty System
title_full Antarctica at Risk: Geostrategic Manoeuvring and the Future of the Antarctic Treaty System
title_fullStr Antarctica at Risk: Geostrategic Manoeuvring and the Future of the Antarctic Treaty System
title_full_unstemmed Antarctica at Risk: Geostrategic Manoeuvring and the Future of the Antarctic Treaty System
title_sort antarctica at risk: geostrategic manoeuvring and the future of the antarctic treaty system
publishDate 2023
url https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00842/95420/103211.pdf
https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA2465-1
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00842/95420/
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
op_relation https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00842/95420/103211.pdf
doi:10.7249/RRA2465-1
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00842/95420/
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
restricted use
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA2465-1
_version_ 1776204939130830848