Working Group on Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO)

The 2021 WGECO meeting was held entirely by remote meetings due to COVID-19 travel re-strictions. Participation was strong, however, the remote setting limited the amount of work which could be completed. An initial plan to take up five Tors was made, but considering mem-ber availability and interes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: ICES
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: ICES 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00723/83512/88524.pdf
https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8279
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00723/83512/
id ftarchimer:oai:archimer.ifremer.fr:83512
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarchimer:oai:archimer.ifremer.fr:83512 2023-05-15T16:49:38+02:00 Working Group on Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO) ICES 2021 application/pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00723/83512/88524.pdf https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8279 https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00723/83512/ eng eng ICES https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00723/83512/88524.pdf doi:10.17895/ices.pub.8279 https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00723/83512/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess restricted use ICES Scientific Reports/Rapports scientifiques du CIEM (2618-1371) (ICES), 2021 , Vol. 3 , N. 83 , P. 33p. text Publication info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2021 ftarchimer https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8279 2021-09-23T20:38:18Z The 2021 WGECO meeting was held entirely by remote meetings due to COVID-19 travel re-strictions. Participation was strong, however, the remote setting limited the amount of work which could be completed. An initial plan to take up five Tors was made, but considering mem-ber availability and interest, only Tors A and C were addressed this year. WGECO decided to keep all of the Tors for 2022, and will consider developing additional Tors from Tor C (Horizon scanning). Much of this will depend on the current state of COVID-19 and member availability in 2022. WGECO revisited work to examine the ecological consequences of stock rebuilding, with an em-phasis on benthivorous fish (Tor A). Two case studies with data from the Northeast U.S. and Iceland compared the footprints of fishing effort and fish predation pressure on benthos. An index of spatial overlap was examined and minor (U.S.) or zero (Iceland) significant overlap was observed with bottom trawling effort and predation pressure. In contrast, dredging effort from the Northeast U.S. showed significant overlap with predation pressure for 11 of the 12 benthic prey taxa examined. Without an active or recent benthos monitoring program for the Northeast U.S. continental shelf, conclusions regarding competition between these two overlapping ben-thic pressures remain unknown. WGECO carried out a “Horizon gazing” exercise to identify key emerging or expected issues, that would be appropriate for WGECO to address at future meetings. Nine topics were consid-ered, listed below: • Defining criteria for including results from ecosystem modelling etc. in advice • Fish productivity measured by production ratio (R/SSB) • Metrics for Ecosystem Overfishing • Industrial zonation of fishing – the potential for identifying the key areas for fishing and to ring fence these • BMSY – the use and meaning of MSY based metrics on both sides of the Atlantic • The elephant in the room, selectivity estimation in stock assessment • Linking benthic knowledge to fisheries advice • Shared-Socioeconomic-Pathways • Fisheries and blue carbon sequestration Potential ToRs were developed for the first four. The remaining issues were seen as important but not yet ripe for detailed examination. WGECO will keep a watching brief on these and pro-pose additional work as appropriate. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Archimer (Archive Institutionnelle de l'Ifremer - Institut français de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer)
institution Open Polar
collection Archimer (Archive Institutionnelle de l'Ifremer - Institut français de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer)
op_collection_id ftarchimer
language English
description The 2021 WGECO meeting was held entirely by remote meetings due to COVID-19 travel re-strictions. Participation was strong, however, the remote setting limited the amount of work which could be completed. An initial plan to take up five Tors was made, but considering mem-ber availability and interest, only Tors A and C were addressed this year. WGECO decided to keep all of the Tors for 2022, and will consider developing additional Tors from Tor C (Horizon scanning). Much of this will depend on the current state of COVID-19 and member availability in 2022. WGECO revisited work to examine the ecological consequences of stock rebuilding, with an em-phasis on benthivorous fish (Tor A). Two case studies with data from the Northeast U.S. and Iceland compared the footprints of fishing effort and fish predation pressure on benthos. An index of spatial overlap was examined and minor (U.S.) or zero (Iceland) significant overlap was observed with bottom trawling effort and predation pressure. In contrast, dredging effort from the Northeast U.S. showed significant overlap with predation pressure for 11 of the 12 benthic prey taxa examined. Without an active or recent benthos monitoring program for the Northeast U.S. continental shelf, conclusions regarding competition between these two overlapping ben-thic pressures remain unknown. WGECO carried out a “Horizon gazing” exercise to identify key emerging or expected issues, that would be appropriate for WGECO to address at future meetings. Nine topics were consid-ered, listed below: • Defining criteria for including results from ecosystem modelling etc. in advice • Fish productivity measured by production ratio (R/SSB) • Metrics for Ecosystem Overfishing • Industrial zonation of fishing – the potential for identifying the key areas for fishing and to ring fence these • BMSY – the use and meaning of MSY based metrics on both sides of the Atlantic • The elephant in the room, selectivity estimation in stock assessment • Linking benthic knowledge to fisheries advice • Shared-Socioeconomic-Pathways • Fisheries and blue carbon sequestration Potential ToRs were developed for the first four. The remaining issues were seen as important but not yet ripe for detailed examination. WGECO will keep a watching brief on these and pro-pose additional work as appropriate.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author ICES
spellingShingle ICES
Working Group on Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO)
author_facet ICES
author_sort ICES
title Working Group on Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO)
title_short Working Group on Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO)
title_full Working Group on Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO)
title_fullStr Working Group on Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO)
title_full_unstemmed Working Group on Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO)
title_sort working group on ecosystem effects of fishing activities (wgeco)
publisher ICES
publishDate 2021
url https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00723/83512/88524.pdf
https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8279
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00723/83512/
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source ICES Scientific Reports/Rapports scientifiques du CIEM (2618-1371) (ICES), 2021 , Vol. 3 , N. 83 , P. 33p.
op_relation https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00723/83512/88524.pdf
doi:10.17895/ices.pub.8279
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00723/83512/
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
restricted use
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8279
_version_ 1766039778963226624