Habitat relationships of boreal forest birds in managed mixedwood forests.
Disturbance ecology suggests that if patterns created by boreal harvesting more closely resemble effects of natural disturbance, then boreal birds should more easily cope with habitat changes associated with harvesting. I tested this idea by documenting avian community responses to partial-cutting t...
| Other Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Northern British Columbia
2004
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/unbc%3A15741 https://doi.org/10.24124/2005/bpgub351 |
| Summary: | Disturbance ecology suggests that if patterns created by boreal harvesting more closely resemble effects of natural disturbance, then boreal birds should more easily cope with habitat changes associated with harvesting. I tested this idea by documenting avian community responses to partial-cutting treatments applied in Fort Nelson, British Columbia. The purposes of this study were threefold: 1) to investigate changes in the bird community following partial-cutting in boreal forest stands; 2) to compare point-count and transect bird survey methods and determine the degree of correlation between the two datasets; and 3) to test the applicability of bird-habitat models developed in Alberta\u2019s boreal forest for predicting species abundance in a boreal forest environment in northern British Columbia. Two bird survey protocols, point-counts and fixed-width transects, were employed in 4 partial-cut and 2 uncut (control) stands. Each stand was surveyed 4 times per season over 2 breeding seasons. Detailed habitat information was collected in 212-0.04 ha plots. Similar numbers of species were observed in each year with 50 and 52 species observed in 1999 and 2000, respectively. More than half (51.7%) the total species observed were neotropical migrants. Differences in cumulative species per point count station between years were not explained by treatment effect. There were differences in species distribution across sites with mourning warbler and Connecticut warbler consistently detected only at the partial-cut sites in both years. None of the detected bird species occurred only at the control sites when data for both years was combined; however, in each year there were 3 different rare species detected only at the uncut sites. Species diversity differed between partial-cuts and controls and between years. Significant correlations between the two survey methods depended on bird species, habitat and timing of survey in the breeding season (i.e., early or late in the season). For the bird-habitat model comparison, ... |
|---|