Looking deeper into security in the Arctic policy of the Canadian government from 2006 to 2011

The Federal Government of Canada from 2006 to 2011 presented a security discourse and policy regarding the Arctic region. In order to understand the government's use of security language this project adopted the Copenhagen School's securitization theory. Using this theory's approach,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Graveline, Matthew Raymond Alexander (Author), Smith, Heather (Thesis advisor), University of Northern British Columbia (Degree granting institution)
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: University of Northern British Columbia 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/unbc%3A15464
https://doi.org/10.24124/2014/bpgub1636
id ftarcabc:oai:arcabc.ca:unbc_15464
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarcabc:oai:arcabc.ca:unbc_15464 2024-06-02T08:00:24+00:00 Looking deeper into security in the Arctic policy of the Canadian government from 2006 to 2011 Graveline, Matthew Raymond Alexander (Author) Smith, Heather (Thesis advisor) University of Northern British Columbia (Degree granting institution) 2014 electronic Number of pages in document: 85 https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/unbc%3A15464 https://doi.org/10.24124/2014/bpgub1636 English eng University of Northern British Columbia https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/unbc%3A15464 uuid: 79538bb2-47fa-4ed3-a760-b69c77bf2e43 bib-number: b1949982 https://doi.org/10.24124/2014/bpgub1636 lac: TC-BPGUB-1636 Copyright retained by the author. http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ National security -- Government policy -- Canada Canada Northern -- Strategic aspects Northern -- Politics and government National security -- Arctic Regions FC3963.9.P65 G73 2014 Text research (documents) 2014 ftarcabc https://doi.org/10.24124/2014/bpgub1636 2024-05-06T00:30:44Z The Federal Government of Canada from 2006 to 2011 presented a security discourse and policy regarding the Arctic region. In order to understand the government's use of security language this project adopted the Copenhagen School's securitization theory. Using this theory's approach, this project dissects the relevant government discourses and policies, pertaining to the Arctic, to determine which sectors the government attempted to securitize. It will be demonstrated that the government has attempted to securitize the Arctic from 2006 to 2011, particularly in the traditional political and military sectors, while societal, economic, and environmental sectors were not securitized but rather their possible threats were framed as opportunities. These conclusions resulted from this government's political worldview around conducting foreign policy and how it wanted to position Arctic security for Canada in its growing Northern region. --Leaf ii. The original print copy of this thesis may be available here: http://wizard.unbc.ca/record=b1949982 Text Arctic Arca (BC's Digital Treasures) Arctic Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Arca (BC's Digital Treasures)
op_collection_id ftarcabc
language English
topic National security -- Government policy -- Canada
Canada
Northern -- Strategic aspects
Northern -- Politics and government
National security -- Arctic Regions
FC3963.9.P65 G73 2014
spellingShingle National security -- Government policy -- Canada
Canada
Northern -- Strategic aspects
Northern -- Politics and government
National security -- Arctic Regions
FC3963.9.P65 G73 2014
Looking deeper into security in the Arctic policy of the Canadian government from 2006 to 2011
topic_facet National security -- Government policy -- Canada
Canada
Northern -- Strategic aspects
Northern -- Politics and government
National security -- Arctic Regions
FC3963.9.P65 G73 2014
description The Federal Government of Canada from 2006 to 2011 presented a security discourse and policy regarding the Arctic region. In order to understand the government's use of security language this project adopted the Copenhagen School's securitization theory. Using this theory's approach, this project dissects the relevant government discourses and policies, pertaining to the Arctic, to determine which sectors the government attempted to securitize. It will be demonstrated that the government has attempted to securitize the Arctic from 2006 to 2011, particularly in the traditional political and military sectors, while societal, economic, and environmental sectors were not securitized but rather their possible threats were framed as opportunities. These conclusions resulted from this government's political worldview around conducting foreign policy and how it wanted to position Arctic security for Canada in its growing Northern region. --Leaf ii. The original print copy of this thesis may be available here: http://wizard.unbc.ca/record=b1949982
author2 Graveline, Matthew Raymond Alexander (Author)
Smith, Heather (Thesis advisor)
University of Northern British Columbia (Degree granting institution)
format Text
title Looking deeper into security in the Arctic policy of the Canadian government from 2006 to 2011
title_short Looking deeper into security in the Arctic policy of the Canadian government from 2006 to 2011
title_full Looking deeper into security in the Arctic policy of the Canadian government from 2006 to 2011
title_fullStr Looking deeper into security in the Arctic policy of the Canadian government from 2006 to 2011
title_full_unstemmed Looking deeper into security in the Arctic policy of the Canadian government from 2006 to 2011
title_sort looking deeper into security in the arctic policy of the canadian government from 2006 to 2011
publisher University of Northern British Columbia
publishDate 2014
url https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/unbc%3A15464
https://doi.org/10.24124/2014/bpgub1636
geographic Arctic
Canada
geographic_facet Arctic
Canada
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/unbc%3A15464
uuid: 79538bb2-47fa-4ed3-a760-b69c77bf2e43
bib-number: b1949982
https://doi.org/10.24124/2014/bpgub1636
lac: TC-BPGUB-1636
op_rights Copyright retained by the author.
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.24124/2014/bpgub1636
_version_ 1800744397817511936