Let’s Get Serious about (Un)Sustainability (Or is it already too late?): Occasional Paper No. 2

"On 16 January 2006 James Lovelock, author of the Gaia hypothesis, wrote that "before this century is over billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable." In Lovelock's view, humanity's tec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Rees, William E (Author)
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Natural Resources and Environmental Studies Institute, University of Northern British Columbia 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/unbc%3A13
id ftarcabc:oai:arcabc.ca:unbc_13
record_format openpolar
spelling ftarcabc:oai:arcabc.ca:unbc_13 2023-10-29T02:34:45+01:00 Let’s Get Serious about (Un)Sustainability (Or is it already too late?): Occasional Paper No. 2 Rees, William E (Author) 2008-03 https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/unbc%3A13 unknown Natural Resources and Environmental Studies Institute, University of Northern British Columbia https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/unbc%3A13 unbc:13 uuid: b72a3926-6785-4eaa-84bb-e5803f5e5059 This paper can be downloaded without charge. publisher http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Text 2008 ftarcabc 2023-10-01T17:58:47Z "On 16 January 2006 James Lovelock, author of the Gaia hypothesis, wrote that "before this century is over billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable." In Lovelock's view, humanity's technological hubris has done us in, our attempts to manage the planet are failing and, in the face of accelerating global change, 'sustaining' technoindustrial civilization is no longer a possibility. Other scientists, while not necessarily accepting the harsh finality of Lovelock's gloomy prediction, share his basic diagnosis on the health of the planet. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) issued a "stark warning" to world leaders - indeed, to all of us: "Human activity is putting such a strain on the natural functions of the Earth that the ability of the planet's ecosystems to sustain future generations can no longer be taken for granted." In this paper I examine the biological, cultural and biophysical factors that have driven modern society to the point where such "stark warnings" have become necessary. I then show why concepts and policies currently advanced under the rubric of "sustainable development" are so generally ineffective. Finally, consistent with biophysical and human behavioural reality, I outline a minimal set of ecological and socio-political conditions that would have to be met for true sustainability. Getting serious about sustainable development will require an unprecedented display of both deep compassion and hard cold reason as the international community considers the dire implications of our prevailing growth-based global development paradigm. Abandoning core cultural values, beliefs and assumptions that have become maladaptive may be wrenchingly difficult but it is also necessary if humankind is ever to become, in Lovelock's words, ".the heart and mind of the Earth, not its malady."" Not peer reviewed Text Arctic Arca (BC's Digital Treasures)
institution Open Polar
collection Arca (BC's Digital Treasures)
op_collection_id ftarcabc
language unknown
description "On 16 January 2006 James Lovelock, author of the Gaia hypothesis, wrote that "before this century is over billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable." In Lovelock's view, humanity's technological hubris has done us in, our attempts to manage the planet are failing and, in the face of accelerating global change, 'sustaining' technoindustrial civilization is no longer a possibility. Other scientists, while not necessarily accepting the harsh finality of Lovelock's gloomy prediction, share his basic diagnosis on the health of the planet. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) issued a "stark warning" to world leaders - indeed, to all of us: "Human activity is putting such a strain on the natural functions of the Earth that the ability of the planet's ecosystems to sustain future generations can no longer be taken for granted." In this paper I examine the biological, cultural and biophysical factors that have driven modern society to the point where such "stark warnings" have become necessary. I then show why concepts and policies currently advanced under the rubric of "sustainable development" are so generally ineffective. Finally, consistent with biophysical and human behavioural reality, I outline a minimal set of ecological and socio-political conditions that would have to be met for true sustainability. Getting serious about sustainable development will require an unprecedented display of both deep compassion and hard cold reason as the international community considers the dire implications of our prevailing growth-based global development paradigm. Abandoning core cultural values, beliefs and assumptions that have become maladaptive may be wrenchingly difficult but it is also necessary if humankind is ever to become, in Lovelock's words, ".the heart and mind of the Earth, not its malady."" Not peer reviewed
author2 Rees, William E (Author)
format Text
title Let’s Get Serious about (Un)Sustainability (Or is it already too late?): Occasional Paper No. 2
spellingShingle Let’s Get Serious about (Un)Sustainability (Or is it already too late?): Occasional Paper No. 2
title_short Let’s Get Serious about (Un)Sustainability (Or is it already too late?): Occasional Paper No. 2
title_full Let’s Get Serious about (Un)Sustainability (Or is it already too late?): Occasional Paper No. 2
title_fullStr Let’s Get Serious about (Un)Sustainability (Or is it already too late?): Occasional Paper No. 2
title_full_unstemmed Let’s Get Serious about (Un)Sustainability (Or is it already too late?): Occasional Paper No. 2
title_sort let’s get serious about (un)sustainability (or is it already too late?): occasional paper no. 2
publisher Natural Resources and Environmental Studies Institute, University of Northern British Columbia
publishDate 2008
url https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/unbc%3A13
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/unbc%3A13
unbc:13
uuid: b72a3926-6785-4eaa-84bb-e5803f5e5059
op_rights This paper can be downloaded without charge.
publisher
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
_version_ 1781057472408059904